Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- IRC (3)
- 1978 Tax Message to Congress (1)
- 280A (1)
- 401(a) (1)
- Ad valorem (1)
-
- Alimony (1)
- Assessed value (1)
- Capital gain (1)
- Child support (1)
- Clarity (1)
- Class action (1)
- Convenience of employer (1)
- Definition (1)
- Distribution (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Exceptions (1)
- Federal income tax (1)
- Florida (1)
- Holloman (1)
- Home to business (1)
- Income tax (1)
- Internal Revenue Code (1)
- Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (1)
- Internal revenue code (1)
- Kipperman (1)
- Moradian (1)
- Normal business practices (1)
- Normal course of business (1)
- Ome office deduction (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Partnerships And The "Used Section 38 Property" Investment Credit: A Widening Loophole, David Brian Mursten
Partnerships And The "Used Section 38 Property" Investment Credit: A Widening Loophole, David Brian Mursten
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Home Office Deductions Under The New Section 280a Of The Internal Revenue Code, Edward J. De Guardiola
Home Office Deductions Under The New Section 280a Of The Internal Revenue Code, Edward J. De Guardiola
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hill Farrer & Burrill, 67 T.C. 411 (1976), David Brian Mursten
Hill Farrer & Burrill, 67 T.C. 411 (1976), David Brian Mursten
Florida State University Law Review
Profit Sharing- NEW DEFINITION OF A PARTNERSHIP "PROFITS INTEREST" DISQUALIFIES AN OTHERWISE QUALIFIED PROFIT SHARING PLAN.
Wright V. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 377 (1974), Aff'd, 543 F.2d 593 (7th Cir. 1976), Ruth L. Gokel
Wright V. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 377 (1974), Aff'd, 543 F.2d 593 (7th Cir. 1976), Ruth L. Gokel
Florida State University Law Review
Income Tax- PROPERTY SETTLEMENT IN DIVORCE- AN UNSETTLED AREA OF SETTLED LAW.
Spooner V. Askew, 345 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1976), Charles A. Johnson
Spooner V. Askew, 345 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1976), Charles A. Johnson
Florida State University Law Review
Ad Valorem Taxation- RATIFICATION OF FLORIDA'S AD VALOREM TAX STRUCTURE: REJECTION OF AN EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGE.