Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Affirmative defenses (1)
- Appeal & Error (1)
- Appeals process (1)
- Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Attachment & garnishment (1)
-
- Attorneys (1)
- Beckwith v. United States (1)
- Caseflow (1)
- Challenges (1)
- Character evidence (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Collateral matters (1)
- Common law recoupment (1)
- Conflict of laws -- Jurisdiction (1)
- Counterclaim as an affirmative defense (1)
- Court system (1)
- Credibility (1)
- Cross-demand statute (1)
- Due process of law (1)
- Escobedo v. Illinois (1)
- Federal Appellate Procedure (1)
- Harris v. New York (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judgments (1)
- Lego v. Twomey (1)
- Litigants (1)
- Malicious prosecution (1)
- Mandate (1)
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Influence Of Jury Deliberation On Juror Perception Of Trial, Credibility, And Damage Awards, S. Femi Sonaike
The Influence Of Jury Deliberation On Juror Perception Of Trial, Credibility, And Damage Awards, S. Femi Sonaike
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Malicious Prosecution Counterclaims Now Allowable In The Principal Action—Implicit Abandonement Of The Doctrine Of Strict Limitation—Wash. Rev. Code § 4.24.350 (Supp. 1977), Richard D. Vogt
Washington Law Review
With the enactment of R.C.W. § 4.24.350,however, the Washington State Legislature has made the malicious plaintiff an endangered species in this state. The statute eliminates two major common law roadblocks—one procedural, the other substantive—to successful assertion of an action for malicious prosecution of an ordinary civil suit. Unfortunately, because the new law is so intimidatingly expansive in its apparent scope, potential plaintiffs with arguably valid claims may also be deterred from seeking legal redress.
Independent Jurisdictional Grounds Unnecessary To Support Claim By Original Plaintiff Against Nondiverse Third-Party Defendant., Mike Davis
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
One Who Unconditionally And Absolutely Guarantees Payment Of A Note Is Bound By Its Terms, Including Its Venue Provisions., Ann C. Livingston
One Who Unconditionally And Absolutely Guarantees Payment Of A Note Is Bound By Its Terms, Including Its Venue Provisions., Ann C. Livingston
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Mere Agreement To Make Payments In Texas Fails To Establish Minimum Contact Sufficient To Satisfy Due Process Requirements For Long-Arm Jurisdiction., Richard E. Sames
Mere Agreement To Make Payments In Texas Fails To Establish Minimum Contact Sufficient To Satisfy Due Process Requirements For Long-Arm Jurisdiction., Richard E. Sames
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Attorney's Approval Of Faulty Order For Summary Judgment Construed As An Order Entered By Agreement., Cathleen G. Randall
Attorney's Approval Of Faulty Order For Summary Judgment Construed As An Order Entered By Agreement., Cathleen G. Randall
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Prejudgment Attachments In Three Courts Of Two States, Philip Shuchman
Prejudgment Attachments In Three Courts Of Two States, Philip Shuchman
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Certification: A Practical Devise For Early Screening Of Spurious Antitrust Litigation, W. Cole Durham Jr., Jonathan A. Dibble
Certification: A Practical Devise For Early Screening Of Spurious Antitrust Litigation, W. Cole Durham Jr., Jonathan A. Dibble
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Justice Delayed? A Report From The Court Administrator, C. R. Huie, G. Lawrence Jegley
Is Justice Delayed? A Report From The Court Administrator, C. R. Huie, G. Lawrence Jegley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Shaffer V. Heitner's Effect On Pre-Judgment Attachment, Jurisdiction Based On Property, And New York's Seider Doctrine: Have We Finally Given Up The Ghost Of The Res?, Mark F. Flescher, Dennis P. Harkawik
Shaffer V. Heitner's Effect On Pre-Judgment Attachment, Jurisdiction Based On Property, And New York's Seider Doctrine: Have We Finally Given Up The Ghost Of The Res?, Mark F. Flescher, Dennis P. Harkawik
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts-Rules Of Civil Procedure-Postjudgment Motion To Intervene To Appeal Denial Of Class Certification Is Timely-United Airlines, Inc. V. Mcdonald
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Procedure--Concepts Of Personal Jurisdiction Before And After Shaffer V. Heitner, James E. Showen
Civil Procedure--Concepts Of Personal Jurisdiction Before And After Shaffer V. Heitner, James E. Showen
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
United Airlines, Inc. V. Mcdonald: Class Certification And The Uncertain Sound, 11 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 635 (1978), Miriam F. Hunter
United Airlines, Inc. V. Mcdonald: Class Certification And The Uncertain Sound, 11 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 635 (1978), Miriam F. Hunter
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miranda V. Arizona: The Emerging Pattern, Evelyn G. Skaltsounis
Miranda V. Arizona: The Emerging Pattern, Evelyn G. Skaltsounis
University of Richmond Law Review
In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court set forth a series of specific guidelines to determine the admissibility at trial of statements elicited during police interrogation of a criminal suspect. Since 1971, the Burger Court has whittled away at the mandates of Miranda. It is possible that one major factor underlies this erosion process: the very frustrating reality that, in many situations, an obviously guilty party is allowed to go free because "the constable has blundered."
Federal Appellate Procedure - Recall Of Mandate - Review Of Judgments After Rehearing And Appeal Periods Expire, Steven D. Mclamb
Federal Appellate Procedure - Recall Of Mandate - Review Of Judgments After Rehearing And Appeal Periods Expire, Steven D. Mclamb
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Demise Of Substantive Time Limitations In Illinois, 11 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 579 (1978), Daniel D. Maynard
The Demise Of Substantive Time Limitations In Illinois, 11 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 579 (1978), Daniel D. Maynard
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ohio Rule 8(C) And Related Rules: Some Notes On The Pleading Of Affirmative Defenses, J. Patrick Browne
Ohio Rule 8(C) And Related Rules: Some Notes On The Pleading Of Affirmative Defenses, J. Patrick Browne
Cleveland State Law Review
The adoption of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure on July 1, 1970, ushered in the age of "Pleader's Lib" for the plaintiff's attorney. In code days, a pleader had to allege facts which showed a cause of action. Under the rules, however, a statement of claim' need only state the bare operative facts which show that the claimant has a claim for relief, and the complaint cannot be dismissed for failure to state such a claim unless it appears beyond doubt from the face of the pleading that the claimant can prove no set of facts entitling him or …
Kentucky Law Survey: Civil Procedure, William S. Cooper
Kentucky Law Survey: Civil Procedure, William S. Cooper
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.