Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Law

Fiduciaries And Fairness Under Rule 10b-5, Thomas J. Sherrard Nov 1976

Fiduciaries And Fairness Under Rule 10b-5, Thomas J. Sherrard

Vanderbilt Law Review

In Marshel v. AFW Fabric Corp., decided on February 13,1976, the court unanimously sustained a challenge to long-form merger under New York law for the sole purpose of "going private,"concluding that despite full disclosure, the merger itself constituted a fraudulent scheme because it represented an attempt by the majority stockholders, in violation of their fiduciary obligations, to utilize corporate funds strictly for personal benefit and for no legitimate corporate purpose...

It is the purpose of this article to analyze the Green and Marshel decisions against the backdrop of previous cases in the area of fraudulent mismanagement, to gauge their impact …


Membership Rights In Nonprofit Corporations: A Need For Increased Legal Recognition And Protection, Robert H. Brownlee Apr 1976

Membership Rights In Nonprofit Corporations: A Need For Increased Legal Recognition And Protection, Robert H. Brownlee

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Note has focused on three issues concerning membership in nonprofit corporations: whether members are entitled to increased protection of voting rights; whether state courts adequately have analyzed questions of membership standing to assert individual claims; and whether members should have standing to institute derivative actions on behalf of a nonprofit corporation. In each of these areas membership rights deserve increased legal recognition and protection.


Taxation Of Income From Intangibles Of Multistate-Multinational Corporations, William D. Dexter Mar 1976

Taxation Of Income From Intangibles Of Multistate-Multinational Corporations, William D. Dexter

Vanderbilt Law Review

In determining whether income from intangible investments should be subject to general apportionment rules or assigned to the commercial domicile or elsewhere the challenge to the states currently is to ascertain the true facts surrounding large corporate investments in intangible properties. The distinctions in UDITPA between business and nonbusiness income mandate this kind of factual inquiry. It is questionable, however, whether this distinction should continue to be given any significant effect, since it lacks substance and leads to endless conflict between large multistate and multinational corporations and each state in which they do business. Furthermore, in determining the state income …


State Taxation Under The Commerce Clause: An Historical Perspective, Jerome R. Hellerstein Mar 1976

State Taxation Under The Commerce Clause: An Historical Perspective, Jerome R. Hellerstein

Vanderbilt Law Review

Although Congress has plenary power under the commerce clause to regulate state taxation of interstate commerce, that power remained virtually unexercised until 1959. As a consequence of the silence of Congress, the task of reconciling the competing interests of states, multistate businesses, and local businesses, and accommodating those interests to the needs of a national economy fell by default to the Supreme Court. The instrumentality available to the Court for dealing with the complex political, fiscal, and economic controversies inherent in state taxation of multistate business was the commerce clause (augmented by due process restrictions and,to a lesser extent, the …


"Solicitation" And "Delivery" Under Public Law 86-272: An Uncharted Course, Paul J. Hartman Mar 1976

"Solicitation" And "Delivery" Under Public Law 86-272: An Uncharted Course, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

In 1959, in response to pressure from multistate business and over the protest of state tax authorities and others, Congress passed Public Law 86-272 limiting the power of state and local governments to tax net income derived from interstate commerce.' The provisions of Public Law 86-272, briefly stated, prohibit state or local governments from imposing net income taxes on sellers of tangible personal property whose business activities in the state are limited to one or more of the following:. solicitation of orders for sales of tangible personal property by the seller or his own representative when the orders are sent …


Interstate Corporate Income Taxation-Recent Revolutions And A Modern Response, Eugene F. Corrigan Mar 1976

Interstate Corporate Income Taxation-Recent Revolutions And A Modern Response, Eugene F. Corrigan

Vanderbilt Law Review

In recent years significant technical advances have enabled large corporations to sell into states from great distances and with a minimum of contact in those states. Nevertheless, the states and their political subdivisions are confronted with the claims of corporations that jurisdictional barriers to corporate income taxes should be raised, that improved enforcement techniques should be prohibited, and that certain classes of income should be immunized completely from state taxation. These revolutionary technical advances have created both major tax administration problems and tax administration opportunities for the states. Some of the latter, however, remain unexploited. This article examines the ramifications …


The Constitutionality Of The Multistate Tax Compact, Robert M. White Mar 1976

The Constitutionality Of The Multistate Tax Compact, Robert M. White

Vanderbilt Law Review

It is now firmly established that states have the constitutional power to tax multistate businesses on net income reasonably attributable to activity within the taxing state. Within this legal frame-work, limited only by Public Law 86-272, the states have fashioned separate and diverse rules for the taxation of multistate corporations.'The recently formed Multistate Tax Compact provides an efficient alternative to both the present disarray of state statutes and possible federal regulation of interstate taxation. The principal purposes of the Compact are to establish uniform rules for determining state tax liabilities of multistate taxpayers, to eliminate ineffective tax administration and the …


The International Centre For Settlement Of Investment Disputes And Development Through The Multinational Corporation, C. F. Amerasinghe Jan 1976

The International Centre For Settlement Of Investment Disputes And Development Through The Multinational Corporation, C. F. Amerasinghe

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The multinational corporation (MNC) as a significant phenomenon in development economics has probably come to stay. The problem for developing countries is how to harness the MNC's power for their own development, and at the same time, limit its all-too-available capacity and potential for unlimited exploitation and influence. Clearly, as pointed out by the Report of the Group of Eminent Persons, there remains much to be done substantively through the medium of the international convention and international organization, both to promote the role of the MNC in development and to control its operations in such a way as to ensure …


Recent Cases, Susan E. Dominick, Robert D. Butters, Walter T. Eccard Jan 1976

Recent Cases, Susan E. Dominick, Robert D. Butters, Walter T. Eccard

Vanderbilt Law Review

The first amendment guarantee of free exercise of religion, although couched in absolute terms, has never been considered an absolute right. The first significant free exercise case, Reynolds v.United States,' upheld the conviction of a Mormon polygamist who claimed a religious exemption from the bigamy laws on the basis of the first amendment. The Court held that while Congress was left powerless to legislate in matters of mere opinion, it was nonetheless" left free to reach actions which were in violation of social duties or subversive of good order."'

Susan E. Dominick

=========================

The instant decision appears to be the …


Parity Codetermination In West German Companies And International Law, Wilhelm Wengler Jan 1976

Parity Codetermination In West German Companies And International Law, Wilhelm Wengler

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

German Law on joint stock companies, in conformity with that of nearly all other countries, has long provided that the organs of the joint stock company (Aktiengesellschaft) consist either exclusively of the shareholders themselves (i.e., the general meeting of shareholders) or are elected by them (i.e., the Aufsichtsrat or supervisory board), or that such an elected organ in turn appoint another organ (i.e., the Vorstand or executive board). Ever since the "old" Labor Management Relations Act (Betriebsverfassungsgesetz) of October 11, 1952, however, only two-thirds of the membership of the supervisory boards of the larger joint stock companies are elected by …