Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Kentucky (918)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (3)
-
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Marshall University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Federal Courts (6)
- Courts (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Caseloads (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
-
- Courts -- United States (3)
- Federal Jurisdiction (3)
- Federal Practice (3)
- Judges (3)
- Judicial Conference of the United States (3)
- Judicial Review (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Administrative courts (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Court administration (2)
- Criminal defense (2)
- Duration (2)
- Federal Government (2)
- Federal Procedure (2)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- Habeas corpus (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Municipalities (2)
- Statistics (2)
- Trials (2)
- 1963 Allen Report (1)
- 1964-1976 (1)
- Publication
-
- 1970-1979 (918)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Villanova Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
-
- Buffalo Law Review (3)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- Supreme Court Case Files (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Guides to Manuscript Collections (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 979
Full-Text Articles in Law
Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-1035
Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-1035
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Reply Brief (P) 1975-Sc-1035
Betty Jo Garrison V. Dr. Horace W. Addams, Reply Brief (P) 1975-Sc-1035
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of By What Right? A Commentary On The Superem Court's Power To Revise The Constitution, Stephen R. Munzer
Book Review Of By What Right? A Commentary On The Superem Court's Power To Revise The Constitution, Stephen R. Munzer
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Omnibus Hearing: Benefit Or Burden For State Courts?, Joel J. Fryer
The Omnibus Hearing: Benefit Or Burden For State Courts?, Joel J. Fryer
Mercer Law Review
The inefficiency of the criminal justice system has come to be recognized by judicial reformers as a major problem that has been exacerbated by the expansion of the rights of defendants. During the past 15 years, largely in response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions attempting to insure due process and promote fairness, trial courts have had to accommodate not only the resultant changes in criminal practice and procedure but also the increased caseload caused by defendants' assertion of constitutional rights which have been recently articulated and guaranteed. The recognition that the burden placed on courts must not be so great …
Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench
Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench
Michigan Law Review
The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since it is now well established that state courts have the constitutional power to adjudicate federal causes of action if Congress so desires, the significant questions concern the method by which the judiciary is to decipher congressional intent. Although the courts have no difficulty where Congress has explicitly addressed the issue of state court jurisdiction, problems do arise in situations where Congress has remained silent on the question. The first section critically examines the traditional criteria employed by the courts for determining congressional intent …
Appellate Supervision Of Remedies In Public Law Adjudication, Robert L. Hinkle
Appellate Supervision Of Remedies In Public Law Adjudication, Robert L. Hinkle
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Private Hospital Activities, Michigan Law Review
Judicial Review Of Private Hospital Activities, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note will examine the judicial review of hospitals under state law and the fourteenth amendment and will suggest that unless certain clear requirements for "publicness" are met, judicial restraint based on the failure of legislative institutions to mandate judicial interference is the better course.
Robert D. Sykes V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0362
Robert D. Sykes V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0362
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Billy Lewis Freeman V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0388
Billy Lewis Freeman V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0388
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Dorothy M. Fraze V. John H. Fraze, Jr., Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0457
Dorothy M. Fraze V. John H. Fraze, Jr., Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0457
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Jimmy Keith Self V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0106
Jimmy Keith Self V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0106
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Catherine Wendell, Executrix Of The Estate Of Fred D. Stone, Dec'd., Et Al V. Bessie Stone, Et Al, Petition For Rehearing 1974-Sc-1144
Catherine Wendell, Executrix Of The Estate Of Fred D. Stone, Dec'd., Et Al V. Bessie Stone, Et Al, Petition For Rehearing 1974-Sc-1144
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings, David S. Clark, John Henry Merryman
Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings, David S. Clark, John Henry Merryman
Michigan Law Review
A method of estimating the probable duration of litigation is useful for a variety of purposes. First, the probable duration of a case may, to some extent, determine strategy in litigation since prolonged litigation is often perceived as an appreciable cost to one party and as a benefit to the other. An estimate of the duration of a criminal case, for example, probably influences the respective postures of a defendant and a prosecutor in plea bargaining. Similarly, civil litigants may be able to use an estimate of the probable duration of litigation, together with other factors, in deciding whether to …
Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings: A Comment, David P. Doane
Measuring The Duration Of Judicial And Administrative Proceedings: A Comment, David P. Doane
Michigan Law Review
Professors Clark and Merryman propose a useful indirect measure of the duration of litigation whose primary virtue is its ease of computation from published court data. As the authors note, such a measure of duration may be useful to persons involved in judicial administration and to attorneys formulating strategy in litigation, and the legal community should find informative their illustration of the concept with Italian court data. Concluding on a pragmatic note, Professors Clark and Merryman appear to suggest that attorneys, clients, judges, court administrators, and social scientists must ultimately assess the utility of their concept. In making this assessment, …
Julian H. Adams V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0294
Julian H. Adams V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0294
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Wallace Oscar Boyd V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0392
Wallace Oscar Boyd V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0392
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Walter E. Parido V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0382
Walter E. Parido V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0382
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Ronnie Meadows V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0056
Ronnie Meadows V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0056
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
George R. Wagoner, Acting Commissioner Of Labor And Custodian Of The Special Fund V. Charles Ray Griffey, The Workmen's Compensation Board Of Kentucky, Lee Furniture Company And Bituminous Casualty Company, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0963
George R. Wagoner, Acting Commissioner Of Labor And Custodian Of The Special Fund V. Charles Ray Griffey, The Workmen's Compensation Board Of Kentucky, Lee Furniture Company And Bituminous Casualty Company, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0963
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
James Cook V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0417
James Cook V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Appellee's Brief 1976-Sc-0417
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Judicial Law Making And Administration, Roger C. Cramton
Judicial Law Making And Administration, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Standing, Mootness, And Federal Rule 23—Balancing Perspectives, Mary Kay Kane
Standing, Mootness, And Federal Rule 23—Balancing Perspectives, Mary Kay Kane
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Domestic Intelligence Informants, The First Amendment And The Need For Prior Judicial Review, Martin L. Perschetz
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
240 Men: The Antebellum Lower Federal Judiciary, 1829-1861, Kermit L. Hall
240 Men: The Antebellum Lower Federal Judiciary, 1829-1861, Kermit L. Hall
Vanderbilt Law Review
Between 1829 and 1861 antebellum presidents nominated 200 judges to the federal lower courts. Earlier administrations had appointed another forty jurists who held their positions during part or all of the era. Of these judges, 108 served in the federal district courts, 126 in the territorial courts, five in the Court of Claims, and one in a special circuit court established in 1855 for the northern district of California. The number of appointments available to an administration involved fate and the pace of territorial expansion;thus, during the first eight years of the period, Jackson nominated thirty-two judges, while in the …
The Impact Of The Courts On Public Administration, David L. Bazelon
The Impact Of The Courts On Public Administration, David L. Bazelon
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
Essays From The Bench (Introduction), Eugene A. Wright
Essays From The Bench (Introduction), Eugene A. Wright
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
Federal Trial Judge's Reflections On The Preparation For And Trial Of Civil Cases, Charles R. Richey
Federal Trial Judge's Reflections On The Preparation For And Trial Of Civil Cases, Charles R. Richey
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
American Advocacy - Foundation Of The American Dream, Thomas D. Lambros
American Advocacy - Foundation Of The American Dream, Thomas D. Lambros
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal
The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
Institutional Reform In The Federal Courts, Alan Betten
Institutional Reform In The Federal Courts, Alan Betten
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.