Law Commons^™

Virginia Bar Exam, December 1969, Day 2

Virginia Bar Exam Archive

No abstract provided.

Virginia Bar Exam, December 1969, Day 1

Virginia Bar Exam Archive

No abstract provided.

The Federal Tax Enactments Of 1969, James F. Dring

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In The Audit Program Of Federal Tax Returns, Singleton B. Wolfe

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Property Tax Assessment Standards In Virginia, Fred C. Forberg

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

1969 Federal Tax Rulings, Don W. Llewellyn

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Tax Titles In Virginia, Marvin C. Bowling Jr.

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

The Federal Tax Sharing Idea, John Shannon

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

1969 Leading Federal Tax Cases, John H. Davies

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

"Judges' Relationship To Charitable Organizations" And "Judge As Employee Of Small Closely Held Corporation," Administrative Office Of The United States Courts Advisory Opinions, Kirks F. Rowland

Publicity & News Clippings

No abstract provided.

Judicial Attitudes And Public Morals, Jon P. Mcconnell, J. David Martin

Publicity & News Clippings

No abstract provided.

Walker Lewis's Speak For Yourself, Daniel (Book Review), Alfred S. Konefsky

Book Reviews

No abstract provided.

Session Law 72-35-2, Florida Senate & House Of Representatives

Staff Analysis

No abstract provided.

Issue No. 8 (December)

The Appeal

No abstract provided.

False Or Suppressed Evidence: Why A Need For The Prosecutorial Tie?, Ronald L. Carlson

Scholarly Works

Many United States Supreme Court decisions have overturned criminal convictions for the reason that the government employed false evidence to obtain the conviction or failed to disclose relevant evidence important to the defense. In reversing federal or state judgments, the Court often has located direct proof of wrongdoing by the prosecutor. The notorious “bloody shorts” case is an example in point. There, the state introduced as evidence a pair of men’s “blood-stained” undershorts to achieve conviction of the accused. When the blood turned out to be red paint, the Supreme Court granted habeas corpus relief to the defendant because “[ilt …

False Or Suppressed Evidence: Why A Need For The Prosecutorial Tie, Ronald L. Carlson

Scholarly Works

Many United States Supreme Court decisions have overturned criminal convictions for the reason that the government employed false evidence to obtain the conviction or failed to disclose relevant evidence important to the defense. In reversing federal or state judgments, the Court often has located direct proof of wrongdoing by the prosecutor. The notorious "bloody shorts" case is an example in point.' There, the state introduced as evidence a pair of men's "blood-stained" undershorts to achieve conviction of the accused. When the blood turned out to be red paint, the Supreme Court granted habeas corpus relief to the defendant because "[it …

Vol. 3, No. 13, November 24, 1969, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Special Election •Dr. Stapp's Lecture at the Law School •Board of Directors Considering Conference on Legal Education •Case of the Week •Letters to the Editor •Intramural Sports •Legislative Aid Bureau Organized •Men in High Places: A Res Gestae Exclusive •Football Wrap Up

Hammontree V. Jenner, Superior Court For The State Of California, Los Angeles County

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

11-19-1969 Correspondence From Burger To Stewart, Warren E. Burger

Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)

Dear Potter:

I concur in your per curiam.

11-19-1969 Correspondence From Harlan To Stewart, John Harlan

Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)

Dear Potter:

This is simply to confirm my earlier verbal comunication to you of my agreement with your opinion as recirculated on November 5, 1969.

Vol. 3, No. 12, November 14, 1969, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Student & Faculty Committee Members to Report to Board •The Defeated Constitution •Student Legislative Aid Bureau Being Formed •The Lawyers Club Board of Directors as a Fraud Committed Upon the Electorate •Letter to the Editor •University Bookstore Policy Board to be Formed •Little Groups of Neighbors •Pictures Still •Register Your Locker Now •Football Poll

11-12-1969 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam, John Harlan

DeBacker v. Brainard, 396 U.S. 28 (1969)

After a hearing before a juvenile court judge, appellant DeBacker was found to be a "delinquent child" and ordered committed to the Boys Training School at Kearney, Nebraska. DeBacker did not seek direct review of his commitment, but instead sought state habeas corpus. The Nebraska District Court dismissed appellant's petition, a divided Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed, and last Term we noted probable jurisdiction over the present appeal. 393 U. S. 1076. Because we find that resolution of the constitutional issues presented

11-04-1969 Correspondence From Harlan To Stewart, John Harlan

Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)

I agree entirely with the result you reach in this case, and with all of the opinion, except I have trouble with two minor matters.

Parley Marsh V. Robert Bryce Irvine And James Blackwood Neil : Appellant's Brief, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from the Judgment of the Third District Court for Salt Lake County Hon. Merrill C. Faux, Judge

Vol. 3, No. 11, November 7, 1969, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Editorial "We're Coming" •The Brown Case Fifteen Years Later •Vote Next Monday and Tuesday for a University Bookstore •What P&R is All About •On Special Admissions •Board Completes Selections •Pictures •Letters to the Editor •One Man's Opinion •Case of the Week •What I Did Last Summer •Law Club Cabaret •Classification and Registration is Next Week •"Beer Barrel Polka Party" •Bill Buckley, Jr. Live at the Lawyers Club •The Allegorical, The Apocalyptical and the Absurd •Football Poll

11-06-1969 Correspondence From White To Stewart, Byron R. White

Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)

Dear Potter:

Please join me.

11-05-1969 Justice Stewart, Per Curiam, Potter Stewart

Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)

The appellant sought to run in the November 1968 election as an independent candidate for the United States House of Representatives from the Twenty-First Congressional District of Ohio. His nominating pettition bore the signatures of 899 voters in the congressional district, a little over 1% of those in the district who had voted in the gubernatorial contest at the last election.

11-05-1969 Justice Black, Dissenting, Hugo L. Black

DeBacker v. Brainard, 396 U.S. 28 (1969)

In February 1968 appellant, who was then 17 years old, was charged under the laws of Nebraska with being a "delinquent child" because he had forged bank check which he intended to use for his own purposes. At the hearing on this charge he asked for a jury trial, arguing this was a right guaranteed him by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution and that a statute prohibiting juries in "delinquency" proceedings was therefore unconstitutional.

11-04-1969 Correspondence From Brennan To Stewart, William J. Brennan

Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)

Dear Potter:

I voted the other way at the conference but you've convinced me.

The Caveat, November 1969

Caveat

No abstract provided.