Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1961

Torts

University of Washington School of Law

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Torts: Abolition Of Sovereign Immunity In Washington, John W. Richards Sep 1961

Torts: Abolition Of Sovereign Immunity In Washington, John W. Richards

Washington Law Review

The legislature has apparently abolished the operation of the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity in Washington with a recently enacted statute. This abolition may be partial, however, and its full effect cannot be predicted with certainty. Much of this uncertainty is caused by the history of sovereign immunity, both in the State of Washington and elsewhere.


Recovery By Federal Prisoners Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, Frank J. Woody Sep 1961

Recovery By Federal Prisoners Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, Frank J. Woody

Washington Law Review

May a federal prisoner, who has been injured due to the negligence of a federal employee while incarcerated in a federal prison, recover from the United States under the Federal Torts Claims Act?'


United States Held Liable Without Proof Of Negligence Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, Gordon G. Conger Jul 1961

United States Held Liable Without Proof Of Negligence Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, Gordon G. Conger

Washington Law Review

In Hess v. United States, the Government was held liable for the death of a workman who was participating in the repair of the Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River, though the district court found that the Government was in no way negligent.


Torts, Dale Kremer, Walter C. Howe Jr., Edward B. Mackie, Virginia Lyness, Gordon G. Conger Jul 1961

Torts, Dale Kremer, Walter C. Howe Jr., Edward B. Mackie, Virginia Lyness, Gordon G. Conger

Washington Law Review

Covers cases on warrantless arrest (Kremer); on contributory negligence—absolute right to stop at a yellow light (Howe); on warning lights on the highway—absolute duty versus reasonable measures (Mackie); on automobiles—dangerous instrumentality doctrine—negligence (Lyness); on the tort liability of a building contractor to third persons injured after completion of work (Conger); and on silence as fraudulent concealment—vendor and purchaser—duty to disclose (Lyness)