Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admission of liability (1)
- Attorney's income (1)
- Causality (1)
- Challenge for cause (1)
- Concurrent causation (1)
-
- Corporate litigation (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Damage (1)
- Damages (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fair dealing (1)
- Inflammatory evidence (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Insurance contract (1)
- Judicial admissions (1)
- Jury selection (1)
- Liability (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Loss (1)
- Mill (John Stuart) (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Peremptory challenge (1)
- Proximate cause (1)
- Risk (1)
- Settlement (1)
- Voire dire (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Concurrent Causation In Insurance Contracts, William Conant Brewer Jr.
Concurrent Causation In Insurance Contracts, William Conant Brewer Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A great deal of work and thought has been devoted to concurrent causation problems in the field of torts. Less attention has been paid to the insurance cases, and no serious effort has been made to formulate the separate rules applicable to them. It is the thesis of this article that concurrent causation problems which arise under an insurance contract must be handled somewhat differently from those which arise in connection with tort litigation, and that the tendency to borrow rules of law from the larger tort field and apply them to the smaller volume of insurance cases can only …
The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell
The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell
Vanderbilt Law Review
To crystallize in a few words the motif of a career as varied and comprehensive as that of Eddie Morgan would in any event be difficult, but it is doubly so for a life devoted, as his has been, to stuff as vital and dynamic as procedure and evidence. For me, his work most fundamentally is to be characterized as a quest for greater rationality in the adjudicative process. Whether one thinks of his analysis of the hearsay rule,' or his rationale of the admissions exception to it, or his treatment of the dead man's statute, or his study of …
Presidential Power To Institute Corporate Litigation, Richard W. Spears
Presidential Power To Institute Corporate Litigation, Richard W. Spears
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Selecting A Jury In Civil Trials, Forrest A. Norman
Selecting A Jury In Civil Trials, Forrest A. Norman
Cleveland State Law Review
It is probably no exaggeration to state that many cases are won or lost on the jury selection. Every lawyer is familiar with cases that were tried through to a jury verdict and following a motion or appeal, were retried to a different jury, with opposite results being reached. In many of these cases the witnesses, the testimony, and all of the facts remain the same-the only difference being in the jury and the result. Thus, the importance of the jury selection cannot be overestimated.
Fair Dealing In Personal Injury Cases, Philip J. Hermann
Fair Dealing In Personal Injury Cases, Philip J. Hermann
Cleveland State Law Review
It is submitted that where there is fair dealing on the part of plaintiff's attorney and insurance company, a great deal of needless expense to both will have been eliminated enabling insurance companies to handle their claims and lawsuits with fewer personnel and smaller defense fees. And plaintiff's attorneys on their part, will be able to bring to conclusion more work during the course of a year; and where a staff is required, they will be able to operate with fewer personnel. The result to the plaintiff's attorney will be an increase in net income and perhaps more time for …
Admission Of Liability, Richard H. Burgess
Admission Of Liability, Richard H. Burgess
Cleveland State Law Review
There is a great amount of resistance to the admission of liability when the slightest defense is available. Many defendants' attorneys would prefer to take the long chance of hoping for an unexpected verdict rather than admit fault and leave only the issue of damages to the jury. Surprisingly, there have actually been cases in which liability was admitted and the jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. Generally speaking, though, an admission of liability will tend to keep the damage award reasonable, but it will take away the slight possibility of an unexpected defendant's verdict.