Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Murder (3)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (2)
- Administrative remedies (1)
- African Americans (1)
-
- Alexander v. United States (1)
- Anarchists (1)
- Book review (1)
- Boy (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutionality of Criminal Statutes (1)
- Criminal appeals (1)
- Criminal responsibility (1)
- District court powers (1)
- Due process (1)
- Ellis Island (1)
- Extreme hardship (1)
- Fair trial (1)
- Falbo v. United States (1)
- Federal penitentiary (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Forms (1)
- Germans in World War 2 (1)
- Grand Jury (1)
- Guilty plea (1)
- Haley v. State (1)
- Indictments (1)
- Involuntary confession (1)
- Jehovah's Witness (1)
- John Memolo (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Joughin And Morgan: The Legacy Of Sacco And Vanzetti, Michigan Law Review
Joughin And Morgan: The Legacy Of Sacco And Vanzetti, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of THE LEGACY OF SACCO AND VANZETTI. By G. Louis Joughin and Edmund M. Morgan.
Habeas Corpus-Federal Courts-Necessity Of Confinement Of Prisoner Within Territorial Jurisdiction Of The Court, Ralph Jay Isackson S.Ed.
Habeas Corpus-Federal Courts-Necessity Of Confinement Of Prisoner Within Territorial Jurisdiction Of The Court, Ralph Jay Isackson S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The Attorney General, respondent, after finding that petitioners, one hundred and twenty Germans, endangered the public peace and safety of the United States by their adherence to an enemy government, issued removal orders for their deportation. Petitioners, while confined at Ellis Island, New York, filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus in the District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the removal orders on the basis that they exceeded statutory authority for their issuance. Respondent moved to dismiss because petitioners were not confined in the District of Columbia. The district court granted the motion and the court of appeals …
Constitutionality Of Criminal Statutes Containing No Requirement Of Mens Rea
Constitutionality Of Criminal Statutes Containing No Requirement Of Mens Rea
Indiana Law Journal
Criminal Law Note
Constitutional Law--Due Process-Federal Restrictions On The Use Of Confessions In State Criminal Proceedings, F. L. Adamson
Constitutional Law--Due Process-Federal Restrictions On The Use Of Confessions In State Criminal Proceedings, F. L. Adamson
Michigan Law Review
Undisputed evidence established that petitioner, a negro boy of fifteen, was arrested at about midnight, October 19, 1945 and taken to police headquarters. He was questioned by the police with no friend or counsel present. He was not informed of his right to counsel or of his right to refuse to answer. At about five in the morning, October 20, he confessed. He was then informed of his rights and his statement taken and transcribed. He was photographed by a newspaper photographer, and then placed in jail. On October 23 he was, for the first time, taken before a magistrate …
Collateral Attack By Habeas Corpus Upon Federal Judgments In Criminal Cases, Frank A. Peters
Collateral Attack By Habeas Corpus Upon Federal Judgments In Criminal Cases, Frank A. Peters
Washington Law Review
Many lawyers never in their careers have occasion to employ the writ of habeas corpus. It is only natural that there should exist, even within the profession, widespread lack of knowledge about the substantive rights guarded by this great engine of release and the procedures involved in its use. This article is designed to demonstrate the scope and manner of using the writ to attack criminal judgments of sentence in federal cases.
Criminal Procedure--Indictment--Offense Laid On A Date Subsequent To Indictment, L. H. B.
Criminal Procedure--Indictment--Offense Laid On A Date Subsequent To Indictment, L. H. B.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts-Rule 20 Of Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure-Constitutionality, William B. Harvey
Federal Courts-Rule 20 Of Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure-Constitutionality, William B. Harvey
Michigan Law Review
One of the few real innovations in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is incorporated in Rule 20 which provides that a defendant who is arrested in a district other than that in which the indictment has been returned may declare in writing his desire to plead guilty and waive trial in the district of the crime. In this event, with the approval of the United States Attornies for both districts, the clerk of the court to which the indictment was returned is authorized to forward the papers to the clerk of the court for the district in which the …
Procedure-Necessity Of Exhausting Peremptory Challenges Before Presenting Exceptions To Rulings On Challenges For Cause
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law-Scope Of Reasonableness Of Search And Seizure Without Search Warrant
Constitutional Law-Scope Of Reasonableness Of Search And Seizure Without Search Warrant
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jury-Effect Of Deviation From Statutory Procedure For Excusing Jurors, Jarrett R. Clark
Jury-Effect Of Deviation From Statutory Procedure For Excusing Jurors, Jarrett R. Clark
Michigan Law Review
In a prosecution for murder, a special venire was summoned and a list thereof served on the accused. On the day of trial, he learned for the first time that the trial judge had excused twenty-six of the seventy-four veniremen summoned. The excuses out of court violated a statute requiring that all requests for excuse be heard in open court. More than the minimum number of veniremen were present, and when it appeared that the original array might be exhausted thirty additional veniremen were called. Accused's motions to quash the jury panel and for a mistrial were overruled. On appeal …
Federal Courts--Rule 33 Of Rules Of Criminal Procedure--Power To Grant A New Trial After Affirmance, Irving Slifkin S.Ed.
Federal Courts--Rule 33 Of Rules Of Criminal Procedure--Power To Grant A New Trial After Affirmance, Irving Slifkin S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
One John Memolo was convicted of tax evasion in the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The defendant's motion for a new trial, on the ground of prejudicial conduct of the trial judge, was denied. He then appealed assigning as error all of the grounds stated in his motion and also the denial of the motion for a new trial. The circuit court of appeals affirmed the conviction. The sentence was executed and the defendant imprisoned in a federal penitentiary. Then the district judge reconsidered, and in the interest of justice directed that the …
"Irresistable Impulse" As A Defense In Criminal Law: A Criticism Based On Modern Psychiatric Concepts, Howard D. Hoedemaker
"Irresistable Impulse" As A Defense In Criminal Law: A Criticism Based On Modern Psychiatric Concepts, Howard D. Hoedemaker
Washington Law Review
This is a criticism of the decision of the Supreme Court of Washington in the case of State vs. Maish. The opinion states that "appellant was accorded a fair trial in every respect, that the trial court committed no error in refusing to give the requested instruction, and that judgment and sentence of the trial court must be, and it is, affirmed." Reference is made to the above decision in detail, the instruction referred to was one requested by the defendant and refused by the trial court. It follows: "You are instructed that if you believe from the evidence that …
Habeas Corpus-Use As A Remedy Where The Appeal Process Has Been Exhausted, W. Stirling Maxwell
Habeas Corpus-Use As A Remedy Where The Appeal Process Has Been Exhausted, W. Stirling Maxwell
Michigan Law Review
Kulick, a Jehovah's Witness, registered under the Selective Service Act of 1940 and, though he claimed an exemption as a minister, his local draft board classified him 1-A. After he had exhausted his administrative remedies to have this classification changed, he reported for induction, as ordered, but refused to take the oath. For this refusal he was convicted under the provisions of the act and, on May 7, 1945, sentenced to imprisonment for a term of years. On the ground that under the Supreme Court's decision of Falbo v. United States the local board's classification was not open to attack …
Federal Courts - Rule 20 Of Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure - Constitutionality, William Burnett Harvey
Federal Courts - Rule 20 Of Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure - Constitutionality, William Burnett Harvey
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. Criminal Procedure From Arrest To Appeal By Lester Bernhardt-Orfield, Elvis J. Stahr Jr.
Book Review. Criminal Procedure From Arrest To Appeal By Lester Bernhardt-Orfield, Elvis J. Stahr Jr.
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
New Trial--The Admissibility Of Jurors In Support Of A Motion For A New Trial In Kentucky, William H. Coldiron
New Trial--The Admissibility Of Jurors In Support Of A Motion For A New Trial In Kentucky, William H. Coldiron
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.