Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Notice Oct 1936

Notice

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Bills And Notes-Holders In Due Course-Effect Of Knowledge Of Executory Character Of Consideration Feb 1936

Bills And Notes-Holders In Due Course-Effect Of Knowledge Of Executory Character Of Consideration

Michigan Law Review

In an action on a promissory note the plaintiff claimed, as a holder in due course, to be free from the defense of failure of consideration. When the plaintiff acquired the note it was physically attached to a conditional sales contract by the terms of which the payee was to furnish the maker with an oil burner which in truth was never furnished, this being the claimed failure of consideration. Breach of the sales contract apparently took place after the plaintiff acquired the note. Held, plaintiff, having knowledge of the terms of the contract, was not a holder in …


Equity-Patent Infringement-Advantages Of Declaratory Judgment Over Injuction Relief Feb 1936

Equity-Patent Infringement-Advantages Of Declaratory Judgment Over Injuction Relief

Michigan Law Review

Defendant had patented a certain seam used in garment-making and also the means for manufacturing it. Plaintiff claimed that this patent was void because anticipated by his own practice. Under this claim plaintiff continued to manufacture the type of seam in question and to sell garments in which it was used. Defendant thereupon sent notices both to plaintiff and to his customers threatening suit for infringement. Plaintiff sought a decree under the Declaratory Judgment Act to determine whether the patent was valid. Defendant moved to dismiss the action. Held, motion denied; a declaratory judgment is an appropriate proceeding for …


Contracts-Assignment-Partial Assignment And Effect Of An Agreement To Refrain From Assigning Jan 1936

Contracts-Assignment-Partial Assignment And Effect Of An Agreement To Refrain From Assigning

Michigan Law Review

The agreement between the defendant, a building contractor, and a sub-contractor provided that the latter would not "sublet any portion of the work of his contract or hypothecate, pledge, or assign any payments thereunder except by and in accordance with the consent of [the] contractor." Nevertheless, after substantial performance, the subcontractor made an assignment to plaintiff of a part of his claim. Responding to a letter from the assignee requesting an acknowledgment thereof and giving notice of the assignment, defendant acknowledged receipt of the letter, and informed plaintiff that the amount of the indebtedness had not yet been settled, nor …