Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (26)
- Courts (19)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Law and Politics (2)
-
- Legal Profession (2)
- Models and Methods (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Applied Behavior Analysis (1)
- Asian Studies (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Experimental Analysis of Behavior (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- International and Area Studies (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Social Psychology (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 29 of 29
Full-Text Articles in Law
Voting Rights Or Voting Entitlements?, James J. Sample
Voting Rights Or Voting Entitlements?, James J. Sample
Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship
It took nearly 100 years after the United States gained its independence for African American men to secure the right to vote, and almost 150 years for African American women. A right perceived—though not de facto honored—as fundamental for all Americans today was fought for in a war less than two centuries ago, costing 620,000 lives. The country quite literally divided over the idea that African Americans should be afforded basic human rights. Today, resistance to the franchise—to what the mythology of America 'stands for'—is not remotely erased, but rather, newly emboldened, even if it masquerades under more obfuscating terminology. …
What Makes A Good Judge?, Brian M. Barry
What Makes A Good Judge?, Brian M. Barry
Reports
This article overviews research demonstrating the factors beyond the law that can affect judicial decision-making.
President Donald Trump And Federal Bench Diversity, Carl W. Tobias
President Donald Trump And Federal Bench Diversity, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
President Donald Trump constantly reminds United States citizens about the myriad circuit and district court appointments that his White House is making to the federal judiciary. Last September, Trump proposed the seventh “wave,” which included three people of color among sixteen judicial nominees. This wave permitted the administration to triple the number of ethnic minority picks whom it had selected, which means that the Executive Branch has proffered ten persons of color in appeals court and district court submissions, yet none is a lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) individual. Nevertheless, a problematic pattern, which implicates a stunning lack of …
Judging Justice - How Solicitors' Expertise Can Improve The Courts System, Brian M. Barry
Judging Justice - How Solicitors' Expertise Can Improve The Courts System, Brian M. Barry
Reports
This article details the initial findings of a nationwide interview study undertaken by the author of litigation solicitors in Ireland on their views of the Irish courts system and the Irish judiciary.
Filling The Texas Federal Court Vacancies, Carl W. Tobias
Filling The Texas Federal Court Vacancies, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Texas confronts many federal appellate and district court openings, but the situation has reached crisis proportions. The state addresses two protracted U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacancies, which have lacked nominees for multiple years, and eleven open trial court seats, all but one classified as "judicial emergencies." This conundrum persists, although the Senate confirmed three jurists for Texas district vacancies in both 2014 and 2015 and President Barack Obama submitted well qualified, mainstream nominees on five empty posts in March 2016. Texas Republican Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz also failed to expeditiously provide those designees' "blue …
Unequal Opportunities: Education Pathways To The U.S. Judiciary, Alfred C. Aman
Unequal Opportunities: Education Pathways To The U.S. Judiciary, Alfred C. Aman
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This paper is about diversity in federal and state courts in the United States. My main argument is that we should promote a judiciary that is reflective of the society of which it is a part for three reasons: first, because in doing so, we gain critical awareness of barriers to judicial service; second, because in doing so, we are also promoting access to resources, education and opportunities in the legal profession; and third, because it is possible (although not automatic) that a reflective judiciary will broaden the range of experience and perspective on the matters involved in the cases …
A Demographic History Of Federal Judicial Appointments By Gender And Race: 1789-2016, Jonathan K. Stubbs
A Demographic History Of Federal Judicial Appointments By Gender And Race: 1789-2016, Jonathan K. Stubbs
Law Faculty Publications
This article briefly surveys the constitutional and statutory foundation for the creation of the federal judiciary. It also furnishes data, by sex and race, of the appointment of federal judges to courts of general jurisdiction during each presidential administration from September 24, 1789, through April 11, 2016. Thus, Part I describes the pace of diversification of the federal judiciary. While data regarding other attributes of judges (such as their socioeconomic status) exist, extensive analysis of such characteristics falls outside the parameters of this preliminary analysis. Nonetheless, the Article notes in passing that, since 1989, during each presidential administration, the majority …
Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity Of The Wto Judges, Louise Johannesson, Petros C. Mavroidis
Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity Of The Wto Judges, Louise Johannesson, Petros C. Mavroidis
Faculty Scholarship
WTO judges are proposed by the WTO Secretariat and elected to act as ‘judges’ if either approved by the parties to a dispute, or by the WTO Director-General in case no agreement between the parties has been possible. They are typically ‘Geneva crowd’, that is, they are either current or former delegates representing their country before the WTO. This observation holds for both first- as well as second-instance WTO judges (e.g. Panelists and members of the Appellate Body). In that, the WTO evidences an attitude strikingly similar to the GATT. Whereas the legal regime has been heavily ‘legalized’, the people …
The Con Law Professor With Judicial Appointment Power, Theresa M. Beiner
The Con Law Professor With Judicial Appointment Power, Theresa M. Beiner
Faculty Scholarship
This essay explores whether, how or, perhaps, to what extent President Barack Obama’s time as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago is reflected in his approach to judicial appointments. Three things are striking about President Obama’s initial approach to judicial selection. First, he has appointed the most diverse bench of any President. Second, he has appointed judges rather slowly compared to his predecessors. And, finally, he has appointed a rather politically moderate bench. How might these particular and in some ways surprising aspects of President Obama’s judicial appointments reflect – or not reflect – his time as …
India And Pakistan: A Tale Of Judicial Appointments, Shubhankar Dam
India And Pakistan: A Tale Of Judicial Appointments, Shubhankar Dam
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Recent judicial appointments in India and Pakistan have led to battles between their respective judicial and executive branches. In a moment of remarkable constitutional coincidence, two appointments were set aside in India and Pakistan last week. First, India's Supreme Court invalidated the appointment of P. J. Thomas to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Days later, Pakistan's Supreme Court invalidated Deedar Shah's appointment to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).
Economic Crisis And The Rise Of Judicial Elections And Judicial Review, Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Economic Crisis And The Rise Of Judicial Elections And Judicial Review, Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Faculty Scholarship
Almost ninety percent of state judges today face some kind of popular election. This uniquely American institution emerged in a sudden burst from 1846 to 1853, as twenty states adopted judicial elections. The modern perception is that judicial elections, then and now, weaken judges and the rule of law. When judicial elections swept the country in the late 1840s and 1850s, however, the key was a new movement to limit legislative power, to increase judicial power, and to strengthen judicial review. Over time, judicial appointments had become a tool of party patronage and cronyism.
Legislative overspending on internal improvements and …
Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?, Joanna Shepherd
Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?, Joanna Shepherd
Faculty Articles
The conventional wisdom among many legal scholars is that judicial independence can best be achieved with an appointive judiciary; judicial elections turn judges into politicians, threatening judicial autonomy. Yet the original supporters of judicial elections successfully eliminated the appointive systems of many states by arguing that judges who owed their jobs to politicians could never be truly independent. Because the judiciary could function as a check and balance on the other governmental branches only if it truly were independent of them, the reformers reasoned that only popular elections could ensure a truly independent judiciary. Using a data set of virtually …
Super Medians, Lee Epstein, Tonja Jacobi
Super Medians, Lee Epstein, Tonja Jacobi
Faculty Articles
It is not surprising that virtually all analyses of the Supreme Court stress the crucial role played by the swing, pivotal, or median Justice: in theory, the median should be quite powerful. In practice, however, some are far stronger than others. Just as there are “super precedents” and “super statutes”—those that are weightier or more entrenched than others—there are “super medians”—Justices so powerful that they are able to exercise significant control over the outcome and content of the Court’s decisions.
Conventional wisdom holds that Justices accumulate power by virtue of their personality, methodological approach, or even background characteristics. But our …
Navigating The New Politics Of Judicial Appointments, Ryan W. Scott, David R. Stras
Navigating The New Politics Of Judicial Appointments, Ryan W. Scott, David R. Stras
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This Review Essay explores the new politics of judicial appointments by addressing the important question whether Senate-specific reforms to the judicial appointments process are likely to succeed. In his recent book, The Next Justice, Chris Eisgruber proposes a two-part plan to repair the Supreme Court appointments process. Like many other scholars that have written in the area, Eisgruber's reforms focus primarily on the Senate. First, he proposes that the Senate get smart by asking penetrating questions about the judicial philosophy of Supreme Court nominees in an effort to ensure that the future Justices are moderates, rather than extremists. Second, he …
An Empirical Analysis Of Life Tenure: A Response To Professors Calabresi And Lindgren, Ryan W. Scott, David R. Stras
An Empirical Analysis Of Life Tenure: A Response To Professors Calabresi And Lindgren, Ryan W. Scott, David R. Stras
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Opposition to life tenure has been steadily mounting in the legal academy and Professors Steve Calabresi and Jim Lindgren are among those leading the charge. Crucial to their argument that life tenure is fundamentally flawed is an empirical claim that the increases in average tenure among Supreme Court Justices are both dramatic and unprecedented.
In this article, the authors respond to Calabresi and Lindgren by showing that their hypothesis of dramatic and unprecedented growth in average tenure has two fundamental flaws. First, it suffers from a period-selection problem. Rendering the data using longer or shorter periods blunts or eliminates the …
Should Ideology Matter In Selecting Federal Judges? Ground Rules For The Debate, Dawn E. Johnsen
Should Ideology Matter In Selecting Federal Judges? Ground Rules For The Debate, Dawn E. Johnsen
Articles by Maurer Faculty
A recurring constitutional controversy of great practical and political importance concerns the criteria Presidents and Senators should use in selecting federal judges. Particularly contentious is the relevance of what sometimes is described as a prospective judge's ideology, or alternatively, judicial philosophy and views on substantive questions of law. This essay seeks to promote principled and productive discussion by proposing five ground rules to govern debate by all participants regarding appropriate judicial selection criteria. Because the continued controversy does not simply reflect principled disagreement on the merits, progress may be encouraged by focusing on deficiencies in current public discourse, including discouraging …
Functional Departmentalism And Nonjudicial Interpretation: Who Determines Constitutional Meaning?, Dawn E. Johnsen
Functional Departmentalism And Nonjudicial Interpretation: Who Determines Constitutional Meaning?, Dawn E. Johnsen
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Published as part of a Duke Law School symposium on Conservative and Progressive Legal Orders, this article considers the appropriate role of the political branches - Congress and the President - in the development of constitutional meaning, including the extent of presidential and congressional authority to act on constitutional views at odds with judicial doctrine. The article discusses deficiencies in strong forms of both judicial supremacy (such as that behind the Rehnquist Court's recent limits on Congress's section 5 authority) and what is described in the academic literature as departmentalism (which emphasizes near-plenary authority for each branch to act on …
Reducing The Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity, And The Canadian Judiciary, Or Towards A "Triple P" Judiciary, Richard Devlin Frsc, A. Wayne Mackay, Natasha Kim
Reducing The Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity, And The Canadian Judiciary, Or Towards A "Triple P" Judiciary, Richard Devlin Frsc, A. Wayne Mackay, Natasha Kim
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The authors review the current structures for judicial appointments in Canada and provide statistical information about the results of these mechanisms in respect to diversity of representation on the courts. They are also critical of the fairness and openness of judicial appointments processes. After examining several variants of the dominant liberal view of law and of judges, the authors proffer and articulate a neo-realist theory of law and what they term a "bungee cord theory of judging." According to the former, law is inevitably a form of politics; according to the latter, judges are unavoidably political actors. In consequence, the …
Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Increasing Balance On The Federal Bench, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
In President Bill Clinton's first year of service, he nominated unprecedented numbers and percentages of highly qualified women and minorities to the federal judiciary. The Clinton Administration correspondingly employed an effective process for choosing potential jurists that generated relatively little controversy.
Some wondered whether President Clinton could improve his first year judicial selection record during his second year in office, especially given the number of international conflicts and pressing domestic matters that faced the Administration. These complications threatened to deflect the Administration's attention from naming judges.
Now that the 103d Congress has adjourned and President Clinton has reached mid-term, the …
The American Bar Association And The Supreme Court--Old Wine In A New Bottle?, Ronald H. Jensen
The American Bar Association And The Supreme Court--Old Wine In A New Bottle?, Ronald H. Jensen
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Preparation of this article was commenced shortly after the emergence of the difference of opinion between the ABA and the City Bar on the practice of submitting the names of Supreme Court nominees to the ABA. We believed this to be a sufficiently important issue to deserve a thorough review, particularly because of a paucity of legal commentary on the subject. Our major attention is still directed to that issue, but the recent action of the Attorney General necessarily requires some expansion of the scope of this inquiry. We confine this study to the matter of selection of Supreme Court …
In Memory Of Mr. Justice Wiley B. Rutledge, Ralph F. Fuchs
In Memory Of Mr. Justice Wiley B. Rutledge, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Wiley B. Rutledge, 1894-1949, Ralph F. Fuchs
Wiley B. Rutledge, 1894-1949, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The United States Supreme Court: 1947-48, John P. Frank
The United States Supreme Court: 1947-48, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. Lions Under The Throne By C. P. Curtis, Jr. And The Nine Young Men By W. Mccune, John P. Frank
Book Review. Lions Under The Throne By C. P. Curtis, Jr. And The Nine Young Men By W. Mccune, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The United States Supreme Court: 1946-47, John P. Frank
The United States Supreme Court: 1946-47, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Judicial Art Of Wiley B. Rutledge, Ralph F. Fuchs
The Judicial Art Of Wiley B. Rutledge, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles And Politics, John P. Frank
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles And Politics, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Iii, John P. Frank
The Appointment Of Supreme Court Justices: Iii, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Justice Appointments: Ii, John P. Frank
Supreme Court Justice Appointments: Ii, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.