Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Corporate Finance (2)
- Economic Theory (2)
- Economics (2)
- Finance (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
-
- Legal History (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Economic History (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Organizational Behavior and Theory (1)
- Policy History, Theory, and Methods (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Tax Law (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Marginalist Revolution In Corporate Finance: 1880-1965, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
The Marginalist Revolution In Corporate Finance: 1880-1965, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries fundamental changes in economic thought revolutionized the theory of corporate finance, leading to changes in its legal regulation. The changes were massive, and this branch of financial analysis and law became virtually unrecognizable to those who had practiced it earlier. The source of this revision was the marginalist, or neoclassical, revolution in economic thought. The classical theory had seen corporate finance as an historical, relatively self-executing inquiry based on the classical theory of value and administered by common law courts. By contrast, neoclassical value theory was forward looking and as a result …
A Preface To Neoclassical Legal Thought, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
A Preface To Neoclassical Legal Thought, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
Most legal historians speak of the period following classical legal thought as “progressive legal thought.” That term creates an unwarranted bias in characterization, however, creating the impression that conservatives clung to an obsolete “classical” ideology, when in fact they were in many ways just as revisionist as the progressives legal thinkers whom they critiqued. The Progressives and New Deal thinkers whom we identify with progressive legal thought were nearly all neoclassical, or marginalist, in their economics, but it is hardly true that all marginalists were progressives. For example, the lawyers and policy makers in the corporate finance battles of the …
Board Diversity Revisited: New Rationale, Same Old Story, Lisa Fairfax
Board Diversity Revisited: New Rationale, Same Old Story, Lisa Fairfax
All Faculty Scholarship
Recently, board diversity advocates have relied on market- or economic-based rationales to convince corporate America to increase the number of women and people of color in the boardroom, in lieu of moral or social justifications. This shift away from moral or social justifications has been deliberate, and it stems from a belief that corporate America would better respond to justifications that centered on the corporate bottom line. However, recent empirical data reveals that despite the increased reliance on, and apparent acceptance of, market- or economic-based rationales for board diversity, there has been little change in actual board diversity. This Article …