Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
-
- American Politics (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Health Economics (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Resources Management (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene (1)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Political Theory (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fischman Serves As Witness In Endangered Species Act Hearing, James Owsley Boyd
Fischman Serves As Witness In Endangered Species Act Hearing, James Owsley Boyd
Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)
An environmental law expert from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law served as an expert witness today (April 18) as part of a congressional hearing on the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Professor Rob Fischman participated in one of three panels convened by the U.S. House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries as lawmakers consider four Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions challenging the implementation of certain aspects of the ESA.
What Congress's Repeal Efforts Can Teach Us About Regulatory Reform, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler
What Congress's Repeal Efforts Can Teach Us About Regulatory Reform, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler
All Faculty Scholarship
Major legislative actions during the early part of the 115th Congress have undermined the central argument for regulatory reform measures such as the REINS Act, a bill that would require congressional approval of all new major regulations. Proponents of the REINS Act argue that it would make the federal regulatory system more democratic by shifting responsibility for regulatory decisions away from unelected bureaucrats and toward the people’s representatives in Congress. But separate legislative actions in the opening of the 115th Congress only call this argument into question. Congress’s most significant initiatives during this period — its derailed attempts to repeal …
Placing 'Reins' On Regulations: Assessing The Proposed Reins Act, Jonathan H. Adler
Placing 'Reins' On Regulations: Assessing The Proposed Reins Act, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
Over the past several decades, the scope, reach and cost of federal regulations have increased dramatically, prompting bipartisan calls for regulatory reform. One such proposed reform is the Regulations of the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act (REINS Act). This proposal aims to restore political accountability to federal regulatory policy decisions by requiring both Houses of Congress to approve any proposed "major rule." In effect, the REINS Act would limit the delegation of regulatory authority to federal agencies, and restore legislative control and accountability to Congress. This article seeks to assess the REINS Act and its likely effects on regulatory …
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation Of The "Substantially Similar" Hurdle In The Congressional Review Act: Can Osha Ever Utter The E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?, Adam M. Finkel, Jason W. Sullivan
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation Of The "Substantially Similar" Hurdle In The Congressional Review Act: Can Osha Ever Utter The E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?, Adam M. Finkel, Jason W. Sullivan
All Faculty Scholarship
The Congressional Review Act permits Congress to veto proposed regulations via a joint resolution, and prohibits an agency from reissuing a rule “in substantially the same form” as the vetoed rule. Some scholars—and officials within the agencies themselves—have understood the “substantially the same” standard to bar an agency from regulating in the same substantive area covered by a vetoed rule. Courts have not yet provided an authoritative interpretation of the standard.
This Article examines a spectrum of possible understandings of the standard, and relates them to the legislative history (of both the Congressional Review Act itself and the congressional veto …