Law Commons^™

Rwu Law News: The Newsletter Of Roger Williams University School Of Law 04-2021, Michael M. Bowden, Barry Bridges, Political Roundtable

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Choice-Of-Law Rules For Secured Transactions: An Interest-Based And Modern Principles-Based Framework For Assessment, Charles W. Mooney Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

This essay examines the law applicable to secured transactions. It addresses in particular the codification of the choice-of-law rules for secured transactions (STCOL rules). These rules address the laws applicable to the creation, perfection, priority, and enforcement of security interests (security rights)—a form of legislative or statutory dépeçage. It draws on the 2016 UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions (Model Law) as well as relevant North American law (Uniform Commercial Code Article 9 and the Canadian provincial Personal Property Security Acts). The STCOL rules lie at the heart of the emerged and emerging modern principles of secured transactions law …

Third Party Funding Of Personal Injury Tort Claims: Keep The Baby And Change The Bathwater, Terrence Cain

Faculty Scholarship

In the early 1990s, a period of high-risk lending at high interest rates, a new entrant emerged in civil litigation: the Litigation Finance Company (“LFC”). LFCs advance money to plaintiffs involved in contingency fee litigation. The money is provided on a non-recourse basis, meaning the plaintiff repays the LFC only if she obtains money from the lawsuit through a settlement, judgment, or verdict. If the plaintiff does not recover anything, she will not owe the LFC anything. When she does repay the LFC, however, she could end up paying as much as 280% of the amount advanced by the LFC. …

Amended And Restated White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Agreement, Settlement Parties

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Settlement Agreement: Amended and Restated White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Agreement; Parties: WMAT, White Mountain Apache Tribe, AZ, Arizona, USA, United States, Arizona Water Company, Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, Buckeye Irrigation Company, Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City of Avondale, City of Chandler, City of Glendale, City of Mesa, City of Peoria, City of Phoenix, City of Show Low, City of Scottsdale, City of Tempe, Town of Gilbert, Roosevelt Water Conservation District, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Salt River Valley Water Users' Association. Contents: Agreement 117 pages: 1.0 Recitals p. 2; 2.0 …

Assumption Under Section 365(C)(1) Creates Uncertainty For Debtors, Heather Hili

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The assumption and assignment of executory contracts raises many issues in Chapter 11 bankruptcies. One issue is whether the trustee can assume an executory contract, thus forcing the non-debtor party to accept performance from the debtor-in-possession. Section 365(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) attempts to resolve this issue by providing that a trustee may not assume or assign an executory contract when applicable law would excuse the non-debtor party from accepting performance from someone other than the debtor-in-possession. But courts relying on Section 365(c)(1) to resolve this issue have interpreted it in different ways, creating a split among the …

Transferring Trust: Reciprocity Norms And Assignment Of Contract, Tess Wilkinson-Ryan

All Faculty Scholarship

This paper presents four experiments testing the prediction that assignment of contract rights erodes the moral obligation to perform. The first three studies used an experimental laboratory game designed to model contractual exchange. Players in the games were less selfish with a previously-generous partner than with third-party player who had purchased the right to the original partner’s expected return. The fourth study used a web-based questionnaire, and found that subjects reported that they would require less financial incentive to breach an assigned contract than a contract held by the original promisee. The results of these four experiments provide support for …

S11rs Sgr No. 3 (Org Fair), Kelly

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.

Should Charitable Trust Enforcement Rights Be Assignable?, Joshua C. Tate

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

In recent years, scholars have given much attention to the problem of charitable trust enforcement. Departing from the common law, section 405(c) of the Uniform Trust Code provides that “[t]he settlor of a charitable trust, among others, may maintain a proceeding to enforce the trust.” This Article addresses the question of whether, and to what extent, a settlor’s right to enforce a charitable trust should be assignable to third parties. Should the law permit the settlor of a charitable trust to assign her enforcement rights after the creation of the trust, or should assignments be recognized only if they are …

Selling It First, Stealing It Later: The Trouble With Trademarks In Corporate Transactions In Bankruptcy, Xuan-Thao Nguyen

Articles

Why does AI get two bites of the “Apple” trademark? Should AI be allowed to grant the right to use the trademark “perpetual and exclusive” with the sale of the music division and steal it back for free, ten years later? This article is part of an ongoing and broader inquiry into the intersection of trademark, contract and bankruptcy laws. This article argues that recent bankruptcy decisional law, notably the In re Exide Technologies decision, misunderstands the “perpetual and exclusive” trademark transaction, deeming it as an ordinary “license” when it is truly an outright sale. This article explains that the …

University Of Prince Edward Island Faculty Association V University Of Prince Edward Island, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Member Grievance dated November 10, 2006, alleging that the Employer violated Article G1.3a) of the Collective Agreement between the parties, effective May 12, 2006 and expiring June 30, 2010, which the parties agreed is the Collective Agreement applicable here. In the Grievance the Union grieves "the Employer's violation of hiring procedures for sessional instructors", which resulted in the Grievor not being offered a sessional contract to teach [Retracted] for the Spring semester of the academic year 2006/7. The Union seeks a declaration that the Employer violated the Collective Agreement and an order that the Grievor be fully compensated for loss …

Statutory Equitable Subrogation, Roger Bernhardt

Publications

This article discusses a Wyoming Supreme Court case which refused to accept the Restatement’s position that equitable subrogation ought to be available to refinancers even though they know or have constructive notice of intervening other creditors.

Broker Buying And Then Reselling: Roberts V Lomanto, 2003, Roger Bernhardt

Publications

This article discusses a California case which held that a seller’s real estate agent breached her fiduciary duty when she contracted to purchase the property, assigned the contract to a third party buyer, and refused to disclose to the seller the amount of the assignment fee or third party buyer’s purchase price.

Summit Financial Holdings Redux, Roger Bernhardt

Publications

This article analyzes the California case Summit Financial Holdings v. Continental Lawyers where the borrower continues to make payments to the lender after it has assigned the note to a third person.

Re Ben's Ltd And Bct, Local 445, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor, as the Union's Shop Steward, is acting for employees in the Employer's thrift stores. The grievance was initiated when the hours of a part-time employee were reduced. The Union asserted that the Employer was manipulating hours to avoid making employees full-time. The Employer maintained that there is nothing in the Collective Agreement which requires the creation of full time jobs where it could, or otherwise prevent the assignment of work to minimize the number of full-time positions.

The grievance fails. Part-time employees were excluded from the Collective Agreement.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (105-95-00518), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

There are six grievances. The Union alleges that the Employer breached the Collective Agreement by the assignment of duties without following the program of work established locally, changed some duties without meaningful consultation and did not ensure that employees assigned to coding duties were not required to code for entire shifts. The Union also requested that employees who had been improperly assigned be compensated.

The grievance fails. The Employer did not have temporary employees trained to code. This reduced the scheduling options. The lack of consultation was considered insignificant.

Leasing And Loaning But Losing Track Of The Difference, Roger Bernhardt

Publications

This article discusses a California case where a mistaken assignment of a leasehold could have been avoided had a bank’s lawyers paid more attention to landlord-tenant law than to foreclosure law.

Escrow Agent’S Duty Of Care To Nonparties: Summit Fin. Holdings V Continental Lawyers Title, (2001), Roger Bernhardt

Publications

This article discusses a California case which held that an escrow holder that who the principals’ escrow instructions owes no duty of care to nonparties to the escrow.

Re Abt Building Products Canada Ltd. And Cep, Local 434, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a policy grievance to determine the work the Spare Boiler Operator may perform. The Employer stated that it intended to assign duties to the Spare Boiler Operator as it saw fit, in order to keep him employed. These duties were not related to steam and boiler operation; they were jobs properly performed by a labourer. It is the position of the Employer that it may assign whatever maintenance duties it wishes to those in the Maintenance Department, so long as no senior employee is displaced. The Union's position is that the function of the Spare Boiler Operator is …

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (078-95-00677), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties bearing the date January 31, 1995, which continues in effect and which the parties agreed applies to this matter, and in particular of Articles 11, 15, 17 and 52, in that, on July 12 and 26, 1999 two relief letter carders were assigned from LCD#2 to LCD#1 without following the seniority and staffing provisions of the Collective Agreement. The Union requested that the appropriate employees be compensated for any lost liar its, earnings and benefits, with interest at the Bank of Canada rate.

Paying The Wrong Debt, Roger Bernhardt

Publications

This article discusses a California case where a lender’s failure to obtain a proper subordination agreement constituted culpable negligence and led to the denial of equitable subrogation for the amounts advanced.

Creditors’ Rights Involved In The Production And Sale Of Natural Gas, William M. Schultz

Natural Gas Symposium: Contract Solutions for the Future of Regulatory Environment (March 24-25)

101 pages (includes forms).

Contains 6 attachments.

Re Island Telephone Co Ltd And International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local 1030, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Employee Grievance alleging improper denial of promotion. Grievance dismissed.

The parties agreed at the outset of the hearing in this matter that I was properly appointed under the collective agreement and that any time-limits were waived. There were no jurisdictional objections. Since the grievor here seeks the assignment to him of a job which he alleges was improperly awarded to another employee it must be noted that that other employee, Rodney MacLean, was advised of these proceedings by the company and chose not to attend or be represented individually.

Gratuitous Partial Assignments, Edwin D. Dickinson

Articles

"Is it possible to make an effective and irrevocable assignment by way of gift of part of a close action? There are no obvious reasons why it should not be possible. Gifts of a great variety of valuable rights are favored and protected by law. Why not a gift of part of a chose in action?"

Assignment Of Mortgages Securing Negotiable Notes, William E. Britton

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.