Law Commons^™

Cacs And Doorknobs, Anna Gelpern, Jeromin Zettelmeyer

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

In response to debt crises, policy makers often feature Collective Action Clauses (CACs) in sovereign bonds among the pillars of international financial architecture. However, the content of official pronouncements about CACs suggests that CACs are more like doorknobs: a process tool with limited impact on the incidence or ultimate outcome of a debt restructuring. We ask whether CACs are welfare improving and, if so, whether they are pillars or doorknobs. The history of CACs in corporate debt suggests that CACs can be good, bad or unimportant depending on their vulnerability to abuse and the available alternatives, including bankruptcy and debt …

The Dialogic Aspect Of Soft Law In International Insolvency: Discord, Digression, And Development, John A. E. Pottow

Law & Economics Working Papers

Soft law is on the ascent in international insolvency, seeming now to occupy a preferred status over boring old conventions. An arguably constitutive aspect of soft law, which some contend provides a normative justification for international law generally, is its "dialogic" nature, by which I mean its intentional exposure to recursive norm contestation and iterative development: soft law starts a dialogue. The product of that dialogue, on a teleological view, may well be hard law. In the international insolvency realm, that pathway is through (soft) model domestic legislation that aspires toward enactment as municipal law. The happy story is that …

Mere Conduit, David G. Carlson

Articles

"Mere conduit" is a legal fiction in fraudulent transfer and other avoidance cases. This article argues that the legal fiction is misleading, unnecessary and rendered obsolete by the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting, Inc. (2018). The article further contends that a huge majority of leading cases confound fraudulent transfer law with the law of corporate theft. This error leads to depriving financial intermediaries of their opportunity to avoid liability on the ground of being bona fide transferees for value. Finally, courts often mistake banks as initial transferees of fraudulent transfers (absolutely liable in spite …

Relational Preferences In Chapter 11 Proceedings, Brook E. Gotberg

Faculty Publications

It is no secret that creditors hate so-called "preference" actions, which permit a debtor to recover payments made to creditors on the eve of bankruptcy for the benefit of the estate. Nominally, preference actions are intended to equalize the extent to which each unsecured creditor must bear the loss of a bankruptcy discharge, or to discourage creditors from rushing to collect from the debtor in such a way that will push an insolvent debtor into bankruptcy. But empirical evidence strongly suggests that, at least in chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, preference actions do not fulfill either of these stated goals. Interviews …

Fiduciary Principles In Bankruptcy And Insolvency, John A.E. Pottow

Book Chapters

This chapter examines fiduciary duties in bankruptcy and insolvency, focusing on the bankruptcy trustee’s duties, which are triggered by virtue of appointment in a case. It first provides a background on bankruptcy law in order to elucidate the doctrines and rules affecting fiduciary responsibilities in bankruptcy, citing a number of relevant provisions in the Bankruptcy Code. It then considers the fiduciary, non-fiduciary, and anti-fiduciary obligations of the trustee under the Bankruptcy Code before discussing the fiduciary duties of care and loyalty. In particular, it highlights bankruptcy-related issues raised by the duty of loyalty with respect to secured creditors, priority unsecured …

Pragmatism Vs. Principle: Bankruptcy Appeals And Equitable Mootness, Christopher W. Frost

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Bankruptcy reorganizations are often thought to present unique problems requiring specialized doctrines. Equitable mootness is one such doctrine. This judge-made prudential limitation on appeal rights permits reviewing courts to dismiss otherwise justiciable appeals of bankruptcy court confirmations of reorganization plans. It applies where granting relief would disrupt the implementation of the plan or would harm reliance interests of parties affected by the plan.

Chapter 11 reorganizations present complex multilateral negotiation problems. The bankruptcy represents a general default, pitting stakeholder against stakeholder in conflicts that require a global settlement. The plan of reorganization provides that global settlement through an interconnected web …

A Non-Profit Entity May Not Be Substantively Consolidated With An Affiliated Debtor, Rachel Armely

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

To date, over 19,000 sexual abuse claims, totaling claims in an aggregate amount of more than $4 billion, have been filed against individual dioceses within the Catholic Church. This influx of claims comes as the result of certain state legislatures allowing individuals with previously time-barred claims to bring civil lawsuits against the dioceses. Consequently, at least eighteen Catholic dioceses have filed voluntary petitions for relief under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”).

In many cases, the majority of the Catholic dioceses’ assets are held by inter-related, non-profit Catholic entities that often collectively hold billions of …

Constructive Fraudulent Transfers—Determining Insolvency, Tyler Beach

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a debtor files for bankruptcy, all of the debtor's assets and liabilities are automatically transferred into a bankruptcy estate. These assets are then used either to help a debtor reorganize or to repay all of the debtor’s creditors in liquidation. Under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), to preserve the estate assets a bankruptcy trustee can avoid certain transfers made by debtors as fraudulent transfers. Without this power to avoid transactions that occur prior to a debtor filing for bankruptcy, debtors could engage in transactions that drain the company of any of its valuable assets and …

It Is Possible To Incriminate Yourself In The United States Bankruptcy Courts, Andre Brittis-Tannenbaum

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution’s Self Incrimination Clause provides that, “[n]o person shall . . . be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right protects an individual from “answer[ing] official questions put to him in any [] proceeding . . . where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.” While the drafters of the Constitution only included language related to criminal cases, the Supreme Court has extended the privilege to civil proceedings, including bankruptcy cases. However, this privilege is not absolute, and can be waived …

Under A Confirmed Chapter 11 Plan A Liquidating Trustee May Have Sole Authority To Review And Object To Claims, Ryan C. Beil

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A liquidating trust is one that is organized for the primary purpose of liquidating and distributing the assets transferred to it. When a plan under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) is confirmed and establishes a liquidating trust, the trust is treated as a distinct entity. The liquidating trust terminates the debtor in possession’s status and conveys the estate’s rights and assets to a “liquidating trustee.” The confirmed plan does not simply substitute the trustee for the debtor-in-possession, but rather it creates a separate and distinct trust, holding certain property of the …

Involuntary Bankruptcy Cases And Discretionary “For Cause” Dismissals, Jp Amato

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

This article addresses whether a bankruptcy court has the discretionary power to dismiss an involuntary bankruptcy case filed under chapters 7 or 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) for cause when there is a finding of bad faith or a lack of good faith on behalf of the petitioning creditor or creditors. In short, it is unclear because there is insufficient authority on this issue in the involuntary context, and the issue remains split among the courts in the voluntary context.

This article first addresses the statutory requirements of an involuntary petition. Next, …

Determining When The Granting Of Relief Is Deemed Abuse Of The Bankruptcy Code Under Section 707, Angela Bonica

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

There is no constitutional right for an individual to have their debts discharged. A discharge is a privilege offered to the honest but unfortunate debtor pursuant to title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). A bankruptcy court considers different standards and/or tests to determine when a debtor may be abusing the relief provided under the Bankruptcy Code. The specific provision that restricts relief because of abuse was originally enacted in 1984, and then amended in 2005 under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”). A main purpose of the BAPCPA was to deter abuses …

Foreign Third-Party Releases May Be Enforced Under Principles Of Comity, Jennifer Delasco

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides a mechanism for a foreign debtor or a foreign representative to seek recognition of a foreign insolvency, liquidation, or bankruptcy proceeding and the enforcement of a foreign court’s orders issued in such proceedings in the United States. A foreign bankruptcy proceeding or plan may contain “provisions that release non-debtors, such as officers, directors, shareholders, or non-debtor affiliates, from claims and causes of action held by creditors or other non-debtor parties.” There is a split in the United States courts as to whether such a third-party …

Debtor-Tenants Located In Shopping Centers Must Satisfy Heightened Requirements When Assuming And Assigning Their Unexpired Lease In Bankruptcy, Kristin Catalano

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor filing for bankruptcy with an executory contract or unexpired lease will be relieved of their obligation under that contract or lease when it is properly assumed and assigned to a third party with court approval. Section 365(b) mandates that the debtor meet certain requirements to assume a contract or lease, which includes providing adequate assurance of future performance.

Section 365(b)(3) governs the assumption and assignment for debtor-tenants located in shopping centers. Section 365(b)(3) enumerates heightened requirements in providing adequate assurance in order for the debtor-tenant in …

Filing A Proof Of Claim In A Bankruptcy Court Subjects The Filing Party To The Court’S Jurisdiction. Anti-Waiver Clauses In The Proof Of Claim Are Not The Same Thing As Objecting To Jurisdiction, Christina Buru

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the United States, a federal court must have both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction to hear and rule on a case. Subject-matter jurisdiction can be met by satisfying the requirements under §1331 or §1332 of title 28 of the United States Code. These are typically referred to as “federal question” jurisdiction and “diversity” jurisdiction. §1331(a) allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction over “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”. §1332(a) allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction over civil actions “where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000…and …

Balancing And Protecting Competing Interests Of A Landlord-Tenant Relationship In A Section 363 Sale, Kayla Dimatos

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 363(f) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) gives the trustee or debtor in possession a powerful tool to sell property of the estate “free and clear of any interest in such property.” Before the estate can sell an asset “free and clear of any interest in such property,” the Bankruptcy Code requires that a debtor or trustee satisfy the statutory requirements enumerated in section 363(f). A sale of property of the debtor’s estate is permissible only if:

(1) applicable nonbankruptcy law that permits such a sale, (2) the nondebtor entity consents, (3) the …

Constraints On The Breadth Of A Bankruptcy Trustee’S Power To Demand A Turnover Of Assets, Timothy Diprisco

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) empowers bankruptcy trustees to compel entities to turn over property to the bankruptcy estate. Property subject to the turnover provision includes “all legal and equitable interests of the debtor in property at the commencement of the case.” Although the Bankruptcy Code is federal law, property interests are still defined by state law. Occasionally, bankruptcy trustees claim property as part of the estate that courts later deem is beyond the breadth of their authority.

This memorandum examines the extent of a bankruptcy trustee’s power to compel turnover of assets. Part …

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Proceedings May Be Sufficiently “Unusual” To Render Forum-Selection Clauses Unenforceable, James A. Goodridge

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The strong policy in favor of centralizing bankruptcy disputes in a single forum often overrides the deference typically owed to the enforceability of the enforceability of forum-selection clauses (“FSC”). As such, with the exception of the Seventh and Tenth Circuits, FSCs are less likely to be enforced in bankruptcy cases, especially when the pending claim is constitutionally core. This memorandum explores the treatment of FSCs in bankruptcy cases. Section I discusses bankruptcy courts’ strong presumption for centralized proceedings; Section II examines the treatment of FSC when the matter is core; and Section III reviews the rejection of the “core …

Exploring The Scope Of The Property Requirement Of Section 109(A) In Chapter 11 And 15 Cases, Rasha El Mouatassim Bih

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 109 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States . . . may be a debtor.” In In re Barnet, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that debtor eligibility requirements of section 109 apply to a debtor in recognition proceedings under chapter 15. If a debtor does not have a domicile or place of business in the United States, as is often the case with foreign debtors, then …

The Standard For Taking A Security Interest In Fixtures, Mark J. Lobiondo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Creditors that have a security interest in the same collateral will often dispute the priority of each other’s liens. In general, the security interest that is first perfected will be entitled to priority over subsequent liens. A security interest is generally perfected by filing a financing statement that satisfies the requirements of section 9-502 of the UCC. Section 9-502 provides that a financing statement is sufficient only if it: (1) provides the name of the debtor; (2) provides the name of the secured party or a representative of the secured party; and (3) indicates the collateral covered by the …

Court’S Ability To Modify Or Terminate A Prior Recognition Order Under §1517(D) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Kristopher Peters

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) governs the process for obtaining recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings in the U.S. Section 1517 governs recognition of foreign proceedings and addresses two distinct, but related, issues: (1) whether a court must recognize a foreign court’s foreign proceeding; and (2) whether a court may modify or terminate a prior recognition of a foreign proceeding. This memorandum analyzes the second issue, which is governed by §1517(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.

This memorandum first examines the scope of §1517(d) and whether and when a court may modify or …

Analyzing A Creditor’S Ability To Exercise Its Shareholder Rights To Prevent A Bankruptcy Filing By A Company, Frank Pecorelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) operates as a tool allowing an honest, struggling debtor to gain a fresh start absent of their burdensome debts. Generally, when a company is about to enter bankruptcy, shareholders and creditors of the insolvent company play two distinct roles. Shareholders, those with an ownership stake in the company, have voting rights enumerated in their shareholder agreement, allowing them to vote on certain actions, including the company’s bankruptcy filing. On the other hand, creditors generally have a claim (i.e., a right to payment) against the company, which typically has arisen …

Selling A Vessel Free And Clear Of A Maritime Lien Pursuant To Section 363 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Aram Movaseghi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor in possession or trustee may sell property of the debtor’s estate. However, a lien on a maritime vessel may make such a sale challenging, in particular because of jurisdictional issues. When a debtor’s assets become subject to the jurisdiction of both admiralty and bankruptcy cases, a complex conundrum arises. Maritime bankruptcies have generated complex legal issues and jurisdictional conflicts that have perplexed practitioners and implicated significant constitutional issues.

Under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor or trustee may seek authority from the court to …

Distribution Of Property Overseen By Family Courts Will Not Bar Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Claims, Allyson Rivard

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In general, a transfer made by a debtor may be avoided under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) or applicable state law, if the transfer was actually or constructively fraudulent. Actual fraudulent transfer claims require a showing of actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors. Constructive fraudulent transfer claims do not require proof of actual intent. Instead, a transfer will generally be constructively fraudulent if it is shown that (1) the debtor was insolvent at the time of, or rendered insolvent by, the transfer and (2) so long as the debtor received “less than …

Circuit Split Created Over Enactment Of Section 510(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code And Its Effect On The Rule Of Explicitness, Rossella Scarpa

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy law seeks to equitably distribute a debtor’s remaining assets among creditors. However, prior to bankruptcy, creditors can contract around their pro rata equitable distribution by executing inter-creditor agreements. Inter-creditor agreements are executed to delegate the rights and priorities of creditors as to a common borrower in the event the borrower defaults. Subordination agreements are a type of inter-creditor agreement, where junior creditors consent to senior creditors having their loans repaid in full before junior creditors receive their payment. Bankruptcy courts enforce subordination agreements through section 510(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), which …

A Trustee Generally May Not Recover An Actual Fraudulent Transfer If The Funds Have Been Reimbursed To The Debtor Pre-Petition, Carina Zupa

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 544 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) grants a trustee the power to “avoid any transfer of property of the debtor or any obligation incurred by the debtor that is voidable by” certain classes of secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and bona fide purchasers. When seeking to avoid a transfer a trustee can look to various other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, including: 11 U.S.C. § 545 (statutory liens), 11 U.S.C. § 547 (preferences), 11 U.S.C. § 548 (fraudulent transfers), 11 U.S.C. § 549 (post-petition transactions), 11 U.S.C. § 553(b) (impermissible setoffs), and 11 …

Discharge Under Section 524(A) Does Not Preclude A Suit To Recover From A Debtor’S Insurer, Michael P. Pitre

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a discharge of a debt “operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action . . . to collect, recover, or offset any debt as a personal liability of the debtor.” This discharge is the “principle advantage bankruptcy offers an individual” because it provides the debtor with a “fresh start” by freeing him from the chains of previous debts.

Even so, a “discharge in bankruptcy does not extinguish the debt itself, but merely releases the debtor from personal liability for the debt.” Therefore, as provided …

In Re Minter-Higgins, Deanna Scorzelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A Chapter 7 trustee cannot recover from the debtor, through a turnover motion, postpetition transfers that were made out of the debtor’s bank account that resulted from pre-petition checks and debit expenditures that were not transferred by the bank to the payees until after the debtor filed for bankruptcy. The § 362(b)(11) exception from the automatic stay insulates a consumer debtor from the trustee’s attempt to require her to “turnover” these amounts.

Catholic Dioceses In Bankruptcy, Marie T. Reilly

Catholic Dioceses in Bankruptcy

The Catholic Church is coping with mass tort liability for sexual abuse of children by priests. Since 2004, eighteen Catholic organizations have filed for relief in bankruptcy. Fifteen debtors emerged from bankruptcy after settling with sexual abuse claimants and insurers. During settlement negotiations, sexual abuse claimants and debtors clashed over the extent of the debtors’ property and ability to pay claims. Although such disputes are common in chapter 11 plan negotiations, the Catholic cases required the parties and bankruptcy courts to account for unique religious attributes of Catholic debtors. This article reviews the arguments and outcomes on property issues based …

Do Payday Loans Cause Bankruptcy?, Paige M. Skiba

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

An estimated ten million American households borrow on payday loans each year. Despite the prevalence of these loans, little is known about the effects of access to this form of short-term, high-cost credit. We match individual-level administrative records on payday borrowing to public records on personal bankruptcy, and we exploit a regression discontinuity to estimate the causal impact of access to payday loans on bankruptcy filings. Though the size of the typical payday loan is only $300, we find that loan approval for first-time applicants increases the two-year Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing rate by 2.48 percentage points. There appear to …