Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual property (2)
- American Indians (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Behavioral economics (1)
- Collective licensing (1)
-
- Collectives (1)
- Content licensing (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Cultural property (1)
- Dispossession (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Indian lands (1)
- Information access (1)
- Information law and policy (1)
- Information literacy (1)
- Information retrieval (1)
- Intangible property (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Law practice (1)
- Legal informatics (1)
- Legal information (1)
- Legal research (1)
- Legal writing (1)
- Librarianship (1)
- Licensing (1)
- Music licensing (1)
- Self-determination (1)
- Trademarks (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
From The Editor, Susan Nevelow Mart
Owning Red: A Theory Of Indian (Cultural) Appropriation, Angela R. Riley, Kristen A. Carpenter
Owning Red: A Theory Of Indian (Cultural) Appropriation, Angela R. Riley, Kristen A. Carpenter
Publications
In a number of recent controversies, from sports teams’ use of Indian mascots to the federal government’s desecration of sacred sites, American Indians have lodged charges of “cultural appropriation” or the unauthorized use by members of one group of the cultural expressions and resources of another. While these and other incidents make contemporary headlines, American Indians often experience these claims within a historical and continuing experience of dispossession. For hundreds of years, the U.S. legal system has sanctioned the taking and destruction of Indian lands, artifacts, bodies, religions, identities, and beliefs, all toward the project of conquest and colonization. Indian …
Facilitating Competition By Remedial Regulation, Kristelia A. García
Facilitating Competition By Remedial Regulation, Kristelia A. García
Publications
In music licensing, powerful music publishers have begun—for the first time ever— to withdraw their digital copyrights from the collectives that license those rights, in order to negotiate considerably higher rates in private deals. At the beginning of the year, two of these publishers commanded a private royalty rate nearly twice that of the going collective rate. This result could be seen as a coup for the free market: Constrained by consent decrees and conflicting interests, collectives are simply not able to establish and enforce a true market rate in the new, digital age. This could also be seen as …