Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Do Laws Have A Constitutional Shelf Life?, Allison Orr Larsen
Do Laws Have A Constitutional Shelf Life?, Allison Orr Larsen
Faculty Publications
Times change. A statute passed today may seem obsolete tomorrow. Does the Constitution dictate when a law effectively expires? In Shelby County v. Holder, the 2013 decision that invalidated a provision of the Voting Rights Act, the Court seems to answer that question in the affirmative. Although rational and constitutional when written, the Court held that the coverage formula of the law grew to be irrational over time and was unconstitutional now because it bears “no logical relation to the present day.” This reason for invalidating a law is puzzling. The question answered in Shelby County was not about whether …
August 26, 2015: Introducing Constitutional Law In The Midst Of The Plight, Bruce Ledewitz
August 26, 2015: Introducing Constitutional Law In The Midst Of The Plight, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Introducing Constitutional Law in the Midst of the Plight“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
January 31, 2015: How To Think About Constitutional Government, Bruce Ledewitz
January 31, 2015: How To Think About Constitutional Government, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “How to Think About Constitutional Government“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Professional Rights Speech, Timothy Zick
Professional Rights Speech, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
Some regulations of professional-client communications raise important, but sofar largely overlooked, constitutional concerns. Three recent examples of professional speech regulation-restrictions on physician inquiries regarding firearms, "reparative" therapy bans, and compelled abortion disclosures-highlight an important intersection between professional speech and constitutional rights. In each of the three examples, state regulations implicate a non-expressive constitutional right--the right to bear arms, equality, and abortion. States are actively, sometimes even aggressively, using their licensing authority to limit and structure conversations between professionals and their clients regarding constitutional rights. The author contends that government regulation of "professional rights speech" should be subjected to heightened First …
Our Court Masters, Chad J. Pomeroy
Our Court Masters, Chad J. Pomeroy
Faculty Articles
In 1995, Utah became the first state to pass a bill prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marriages performed in other states and nations. Thereafter, in 2004, Utah voters approved a ballot referendum on Utah Constitutional Amendment 3, which defined marriage as the legal union between a man and a woman and which restricted unmarried civil unions. This referendum was approved by 65.9% of those who voted on it. That is, 593,297 Utah citizens (of the approximately 900,000 who voted) voted to approve the amendment.
Then, in March of 2013, three couples filed suit in the United States District Court for …
Governmental Power Versus Individual Liberty, Vincent R. Johnson
Governmental Power Versus Individual Liberty, Vincent R. Johnson
Faculty Articles
Father, Son, and Constitution by Alexander Wohl is a major contribution to legal scholarship. This dual biography focuses on two public figures, each of whom played a leading role in addressing the most challenging legal questions of their day. The subjects of the book are Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark and his son Ramsey Clark, the most liberal attorney general in American history. The Clarks’ stories are told against a backdrop of the continuing American struggle to find the proper balance between governmental power and individual liberty.
The public careers of Tom and Ramsey Clark were largely sequential, but …