Law Commons^™

Conflicting Preferences In Business Bankruptcy: The Need For Different Rules In Different Chapters, Brook E. Gotberg

Faculty Publications

The law of preferential transfers permits the trustee of a bankruptcy estate to avoid transfers made by the debtor to a creditor on account of a prior debt in the 90 days leading up to the bankruptcy proceeding. The standard for avoiding these preferential transfers is one of strict liability, on the rationale that preference actions exist to ensure that all general creditors of the bankruptcy estate recover the same proportional amount, regardless of the debtor's intent to favor any one creditor or the creditor's intent to be so favored. But preference law also permits certain exceptions to strict preference …

Debt-Buyer Lawsuits And Inaccurate Data, Peter A. Holland

Faculty Scholarship

Pursuant to secret purchase and sale agreements (also known as forward flow agreements), the accounts that banks sell to debt buyers are often sold “as is,” with explicit and emphatic disclaimers that the debts may not be owed, the amounts claimed may not be accurate, and documentation may be missing. Despite their full knowledge that the accuracy and completeness of the data has been specifically disclaimed by the bank, when they sue consumers, debt buyers tell courts that the information obtained from the bank is inherently reliable and accurate. In order to avoid a fraud on the courts, the contents …

Single Point Of Entry And The Bankruptcy Alternative, David A. Skeel Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

This Essay, which will appear in Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, a Brookings Institution and Hoover Institution book, begins with a brief overview of concerns raised by the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy about the adequacy of our existing architecture for resolving the financial distress of systemically important financial institutions. The principal takeaway of the first section is that Title II as enacted left most of these issues unanswered. By contrast, the FDIC’s new single point of entry strategy, which is introduced in the second section, can be seen as addressing nearly all of them. The …

Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction After Executive Benefits Insurance Agency V. Arkison, Keith Sharfman, G. Ray Warner

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy law has been struggling for several years now with the so-called "Stern problem”—the jurisdictional cloud of doubt that has been cast by the Supreme Court's decision in Stern v. Marshall over much of the work that bankruptcy courts have done routinely for decades. Since Stern was decided, bankruptcy courts and the litigants who appear before them cannot be confident that it is constitutional for non-Article III bankruptcy judges to adjudicate various matters over which there is clear statutory jurisdiction, such as avoidance actions against third party transferees who are not otherwise involved or participating in the bankruptcy …

Not Just Anna Nicole Smith: Cleavage In Bankruptcy, David G. Epstein

Law Faculty Publications

This is an essay about the unwarranted erosion of two basic bankruptcy principles:the cleavage effect of a debtor's filing of a bankruptcy petition and the equality of treatment of prepetition unsecured claims. These are two of the most fundamental bankruptcy concepts. First courts and then Congress have fashioned rules favoring the prepetition unsecured claims of vendors and lessors that are inconsistent with these concepts. We explore the origins of such favored treatment, question the commonly offered policy justifications, and argue that the prepetition unsecured claims of vendors and lessors generally should be afforded the same treatment in bankruptcy as other …

When Should Bankruptcy Be An Option (For People, Places Or Things)?, David A. Skeel Jr.

All Faculty Scholarship

When many people think about bankruptcy, they have a simple left-to-right spectrum of possibilities in mind. The spectrum starts with personal bankruptcy, moves next to corporations and other businesses, and then to municipalities, states, and finally countries. We assume that bankruptcy makes the most sense for individuals; that it makes a great deal of sense for corporations; that it is plausible but a little more suspect for cities; that it would be quite odd for states; and that bankruptcy is unimaginable for a country.

In this Article, I argue that the left-to-right spectrum is sensible but mistaken. After defining “bankruptcy,” …

Section 362(C)(3): Does It Terminate The Entire Automatic Stay?, Michael Aryeh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 362 operates to create an automatic stay upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition. The automatic stay, among other things, prevents a debtor’s creditors from seeking to enforce a judgment against a debtor or against property of the estate, taking any act to obtain possession of property of the estate, or taking any act to create or enforce a lien. Section 362, however, does contain numerous provisions that provide for limitations to the automatic stay.

Among these provisions is section 362(c)(3)(A), which provides in relevant part that “if a single or joint case is filed by or against …

No Second Chances: How Courts Have Interpreted Section 109(G)(2) To Prohibit Debtors From Filing A Second Petition Within 180 Days, Brian Adelmann

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In 1984, Congress enacted section 109(g)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code for the purpose of curbing the abuse of repetitive bankruptcy filings by debtors. Section 109(g)(2) provides that an individual may not be a debtor if the debtor requested and obtained a voluntary dismissal of a previous bankruptcy case at any time in the preceding 180 days. The typical scenario that section 109(g)(2) is intended to prevent a debtor from voluntarily dismissing his bankruptcy case and subsequent refiling of a new case in order to prevent a creditor from acquiring relief from the automatic stay. The statute gives secured creditors …

The Reciprocal Duty Of Good Faith Negotiations In Chapter 9 Bankruptcies, John Boersma

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code states that municipalities may only proceed under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code if, among other things, they are specifically authorized to do so by their respective state law. As a result, municipal bankruptcies are governed by both the Bankruptcy Code and the state law of the relevant municipality. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the good faith of the parties involved is of primary importance due to its role in the approval or rejection of a debtor’s petition for chapter 9 bankruptcy protection. Given the fact that a successful petition has the ability to significantly alter the …

Whether A Contract Is Divisible For Purposes Of Section 365 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Christopher Bolz

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code governs the assumption, rejection, and assignment of executory contracts and unexpired leases in bankruptcy cases. Although the definition of an executory contract has not been codified, it is considered to be a contract that has not been fully performed. The assumption or rejection of an executory contract is achieved through court approval, except in certain instances concerning Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Rejection leads to a non-administrative unsecured claim for damages. Following rejection, neither the estate nor the other party owes performance to one another.

The trustee or debtor in possession must assume or reject …

Whether The Equitable Power Of The Bankruptcy Court Can Save The Tardy Filing Of A Nondischargeability Complaint, Aldo A. Caira Iii

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Courts have long held that the Bankruptcy Code provides a discharge only to those “honest but unfortunate debtors.” To that end, when a debt has been incurred under false pretenses, false representation, or outright fraud, the Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor’s creditors to file a nondischargeability complaint against the debtor. However, in order for the creditor to challenge the dischargeability of a debt, the creditor must file his or her nondischargeability complaint in a timely manner. A creditor who fails to file a timely complaint (or to seek a “for cause” extension) risks losing the right to challenge the …

Determining When Projected Disposable Income Test May Be A Basis For A Post-Confirmation Modification, Steven Ching

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In order for a chapter 13 plan to be confirmed, the plan must provide that the debtor will contribute his projected disposable income towards his plan payments. However, circumstances may change after confirmation of the chapter 13 plan, and the debtor or trustee may find themselves in need to modify the plan payment. Under section 1329 of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor, trustee, or an unsecured creditor may request to modify the plan after confirmation of the plan but before completion of the payments.

Generally, bankruptcy courts have broad discretion to approve or disapprove a post-confirmation modification of a …

Whether The Absolute Priority Rule Has Been Abrogated In Individual Chapter 11 Cases, Colin Coburn

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In recent years, a debate has been raging over whether the absolute priority rule in applies to individual chapter 11 debtors. Essentially, the absolute priority rule dictates that junior creditors cannot retain anything under a plan if an objecting senior creditor is not paid in full. If each class of creditor does not consent to a plan of reorganization, a bankruptcy court can still confirm the plan if it meets statutory requirements and is deemed “fair and equitable.” This method of confirmation is known as a “cramdown.” In order for a plan to be “fair and equitable,” it must, …

Fairness Over Deference: The Shifting Landscape Of Creditors Rights To Claims And Debtor Protection Regarding The Issuance Of Form 1099-C, Patrick Christensen

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Issues surrounding the discharge of indebtedness with regard to Form 1099-C filings have recently become a difficult issue for bankruptcy courts. When a debtor cannot afford to pay a creditor an outstanding debt, a Form 1099-C is utilized to “discharge the debt.” The resulting cancellation is then reportable for tax purposes for both the debtor (as cancellation-of-debt income – “COD income”) and the creditor (as a deduction). Form 1099-C filings are made by creditors and issued to each “debtor for whom . . . $600 or more of a debt owed” had been cancelled.

Courts have had to consider …

Can A Bankruptcy Trustee Recover Assets Transferred To A Self-Settled Trust?, Christian Corkery

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A “spendthrift trust” provides a fund for the benefit of another, secures it against the beneficiary’s improvidence, and places it beyond the reach of the beneficiary’s creditors. A spendthrift trust has long been recognized as a useful vehicle for providing the beneficiary with the benefits of the trust while simultaneously preventing the beneficiary from voluntarily transferring his interest in the trust. This is particularly useful where the settlor wants to protect the transfer of wealth to a beneficiary. For instance, if a parent makes a large gift to an irresponsible child, the child will likely squander the gift …

An Assignee Has The Same Right Of Non-Dischargeability Under Section 523(A)(2)(B) As The Assignor, Justin W. Curcio

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code affords an “honest but unfortunate debtor” a “fresh start” by discharging certain prior financial obligations of the debtor. The bankruptcy process allows debtors to “reorder their affairs, make peace with their creditors, and enjoy ‘a new opportunity in life with a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of preexisting debt.’” However, there are limitations on a debtor’s ability to obtain a discharge. For example, a creditor that lent money to a debtor based on a fraudulent writing can seek a determination that the debt is non-dischargeabile under section 523(a)(2)(B).

Issues arise …

The Differences Between The Right To Setoff Under 11 U.S.C. §553 And 11 U.S.C. §558, Maria Ehlinger

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcy cases, the right to setoff is a powerful tool used by both debtors and creditors to avoid having to pay a debt owed to another. The right to setoff is defined as “[a] debtor’s right to reduce the amount of a debt by any sum the creditor owes the debtor the counterbalancing sum owed by the creditor.” A right to setoff usually arises when a debtor owes a debt to a creditor and the creditor owes a debt to the debtor. The purpose of a setoff is to “allow entities that owe each other money to apply …

The Effect Of Conversion On A Post-Petition Lender’S Superpriority Claim Over A Chapter 7 Trustee’S Post-Conversion Administrative Expense Claim, Michael Foster

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code provides a priority scheme that dictates the order in which claims are to be paid. Generally, secured claims get paid out first. Secured claims are followed by administrative expense claims, which include expenses incurred for administration of the estate, such as professional fees of the trustee, attorney, or accountant employed by the estate, and certain taxes. These claims are then followed by other priority unsecured claims, and finally general unsecured claims. The amount of the distribution that a creditor will receive in a bankruptcy case depends on numerous factors, including the total number of other creditors …

Applying The Automatic Stay To Non-Debtors, Raff Ferraioli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code is regarded as one of the most essential protections the Code offers to debtors. Section 362(a) provides that the filing of a bankruptcy petition “operates as a stay [of] action[s] or proceeding[s] against the debtor.” Thus, when an entity files for bankruptcy, an automatic stay is created that prevents creditors from taking any action to collect or enforce a debt, including among other things, continuing ongoing litigation.

Practically, the automatic stay enables all claims against a debtor to be brought in a single forum. Simultaneously, it also preserves “what remains of …

The Effect Of Ongoing Civil Litigation On Chapter 11 Reorganization, Kaitlin Fitzgibbon

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Businesses and, in some cases, individuals who have incurred a significant amount of debt can voluntarily file for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as a means of settling their debts with their creditors and preserving their businesses as going concerns. Chapter 11 is a vehicle for businesses to achieve this goal because it emphasizes debtor reorganization and rehabilitation rather than liquidation. Chapter 11 strikes a balance between rehabilitating the debtor and maximizing value to creditors. Public policy encourages reorganization as opposed to liquidation wherever possible because the successful rehabilitation of debtors is in the best interest …

S-Corp And Qsub Tax Status As Property Of The Bankruptcy Estate, Ryan Jennings

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under the Internal Revenue Code, a corporation can elect to be an “S” Corporation (“S-Corp”) for federal income tax purposes. Electing for S-Corp status will make the corporation a pass through entity, meaning that the corporation itself will not have any tax benefits or liability. Instead, the company’s income will be passed on to it shareholders, who will have to report it on their personal tax returns. Similarly, an S-Corp that owns a subsidiary corporation can elect to treat it as qualified subchapter S subsidiary (“QSub”). A QSub is also a pass through entity that passes its tax benefits …

Litigation Trustees Not Allowed To Wear Their “Non-Bankruptcy Hats” To Avoid Swap Transactions As Fraudulent Conveyances, Aura M. Gomez Lopez

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code provides bankruptcy trustees with avoidance powers that allow the trustees to undo certain pre- and post-petition actions. The purpose of this power to allow the recovering property or interests transferred by the debtor in order to maximize the value of the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of the creditor and to provide more equitable distribution to creditors. Among these avoidance powers is the power to avoid fraudulent transfers/conveyances. In particular, the bankruptcy trustee may avoid a transfer (1) as an actually fraudulent transfer if it was made with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud …

Professional Firm Retention: Determining Whether A Professional Is A “Professional Person” Within Section 327(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Alexandra Hastings

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An important issue in chapter 11 cases is whether a “professional person” qualifies as a bankruptcy “professional” within section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 327(a) requires that a trustee or debtor-in-possession must seek court approval for the employment of attorneys, accountants, appraisers, auctioneers, or other “professional persons” assisting the debtor with its bankruptcy case. Further, section 327(a) specifies, among other things, that a trustee or debtor-in-possession may only employ professionals that are “disinterested persons” to assist in the administration of the debtor’s bankruptcy case. The failure to obtain court approval under section 327(a) “may result in the denial …

Discharging Non-Filing Co-Debtor Debt Under Chapter 13, Carly Krupnick

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

During chapter 13 proceedings, both the debtor and the non-filing co-debtor are protected from their creditors by a stay. Once a bankruptcy petition is filed, section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code creates an “automatic stay” that operates by halting almost all actions by creditors against the debtor and his property to collect a prepetition debt. In a chapter 13 bankruptcy case, section 1301(a) provides that the filing of the petition also automatically creates a co-debtor stay that generally prevents a creditor from taking any “act[ion], or commenc[ing] or continu[ing] any civil action, to collect all or any part of …

Whether Funds Transferred From Trust Account Can Be “Property Of The Debtor” That Is Subject To A Fraudulent Transfer Claim, Adam C.B. Lanza

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

One of the main purposes of bankruptcy is to maximize the value of the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of creditors. Consistent with this goal of maximizing the value of a bankrupt estate, a bankruptcy trustee has certain “avoidance powers” that are codified in chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code. These broad powers allow the trustee to file adversary proceedings to avoid certain pre- and post-petition transfers of property of the debtor. After a trustee avoids a transfer, the “transferred property is returned to the estate for the benefit of all persons who have presented valid claims.”

One common …

Whether The Doctrine Of Judicial Estoppel Applies If The Debtor Fails To List A Lawsuit In His Or Her Bankruptcy Schedules, Joshua Nadelbach

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Many different tactics are used by both plaintiffs and defendants to try and gain an upper hand in court proceedings. One particular scheme occurs when parties take an inconsistent position with one they successfully asserted in an earlier proceeding. The idea of the scheme is to be successful initially and then to contradict the position previously taken based on the need of the moment. To combat that particular ploy, the courts developed the doctrine of judicial estoppel.

Judicial estoppel generally refers to “judicially-imposed limitations on litigants who would assert two irreconcilable positions in successive litigations.” The purpose of judicial …

Does The “Free And Clear” Language In An Order Approving A Sale Pursuant To Section 363(F) Of The Bankruptcy Code Bar A Successor Liability Claim?, Stephanie Y. Lin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code was enacted to empower debtors to maximize the value of their bankruptcy estate for the benefit of creditors. Because the assets sold in a sale under section 363(f) (a “363 Sale”) transfer “free and clear” of “any interest in such property,” a purchaser would be more likely to pay a higher price for the assets. In turn, a higher price paid for the assets results in more available resources to distribute among the debtor’s creditors. If a claim is considered an “interest in such property” and the sale order provides that the sale …

Whether Section 522(B)(3) Of The Bankruptcy Code Contains An Implied Residency Requirement For Determining Which Exemption Scheme Applies, Christopher Mccune

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Filing a bankruptcy petition creates a bankruptcy estate consisting of all the debtor’s legal or equitable interests in property, plus any proceeds generated from the disposition of property of the estate. Once a debtor’s asset becomes property of the estate, all the debtor’s rights in that property are extinguished, unless the property is “exempted” under section 522 of the Bankruptcy Code or is otherwise abandoned back to the debtor. Accordingly, while creditors are entitled to seek reimbursement in the rest of the bankruptcy estate, the debtor may retain his or her interest in exempted property.

Thus, section 522 of …

Preclusive Effect Of Pre-Petition State Court Judgments In Nondischargeability Proceedings, Kelly E. Porcelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A central purpose of the Bankruptcy Code is to provide a “fresh start” for the “honest but unfortunate debtor.” Subject to various exceptions, section 727 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the court shall grant the debtor a discharge, which permanently enjoins the debtor’s creditors from attempting to collect any prepetition debts. This “fresh start” policy is not absolute, however, and section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code lists various types of debts that are nondischargeable. Under section 523(a)(2), (4), and (6), a debtor will not be discharged from debts which are “(2) . . . obtained by-- (A) false …

The Purchaser Of A Tax Lien Is The Holder Of A “Tax Claim” Under 11 U.S.C. §511(A), Andrew Reardon

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Governmental entities may place a tax lien against property for delinquent taxes owed on such property or as a result of the property owner’s failure to pay income or other taxes. Once the tax lien is perfected, the governmental entities can either enforce the lien or sell the liens, in order to recover the delinquent taxes. Private entities may purchase the liens, which often impose high interest rates on the debtors. A purchaser of the tax liens will be able to collect payment directly from the debtor when the property is sold or, if necessary, foreclose, while the government …