Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
2014 Year In Review: 2 Law Schools Welcome New Deans While A Third Experiences Abrupt Departure
2014 Year In Review: 2 Law Schools Welcome New Deans While A Third Experiences Abrupt Departure
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Making Law School A Place For People Who Know What They Want To Do
Making Law School A Place For People Who Know What They Want To Do
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
New Dean's Full Agenda Leaves No Time For Decorating, Marilyn Odendahl
New Dean's Full Agenda Leaves No Time For Decorating, Marilyn Odendahl
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Outstanding Friend - Austen L. Parrish
Outstanding Friend - Austen L. Parrish
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Maurer Dean Honored, Awards At Founders Day, Jobs For Students With Disabilities, Kelley Rankings Climb, Mj Slaby
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Greetings From Bloomington, Austen L. Parrish
Greetings From Bloomington, Austen L. Parrish
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Officers Under The Appointments Clause, John Plecnik
Officers Under The Appointments Clause, John Plecnik
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Much ink has been spilled, and many keyboards worn, debating the definition of "Officers of the United States" under the Appointments Clause of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution. The distinction between Officers and employees is constitutionally and practically significant, because the former must be appointed by the President, with or without the advice and consent of the Senate, Courts of Law, or Heads of Departments. In contrast, employees may be hired by anyone in any manner.
Appointments Clause controversies are triggered when a government official who was hired as an employee is accused of unconstitutionally wielding …
Dear Alumni And Friends:, Austen L. Parrish
Dear Alumni And Friends:, Austen L. Parrish
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Meet Indiana Law's New Dean, Austen L. Parrish, Ken Turchi
Meet Indiana Law's New Dean, Austen L. Parrish, Ken Turchi
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Austen Parrish Named New Law School Dean, Katherine Schultz
Austen Parrish Named New Law School Dean, Katherine Schultz
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
The Iu Maurer School Of Law Welcomes Dean Austen L. Parrish (Postcard)
The Iu Maurer School Of Law Welcomes Dean Austen L. Parrish (Postcard)
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
New Maurer Dean To Creat Buzz About School, Marilyn Odendahl
New Maurer Dean To Creat Buzz About School, Marilyn Odendahl
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
No abstract provided.
Considering Patricia Millett For The D.C. Circuit, Carl W. Tobias
Considering Patricia Millett For The D.C. Circuit, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
On June 4, Obama nominated three individuals: Patricia Millett, who has argued 32 Supreme Court appeals, Cornelia Pillard, who has won landmark High Court victories, and Robert Wilkins, who had served as a D.C. District Court judge for three years. The court’s allegedly smaller caseloads prompted Republicans to halt yes or no votes for all the nominees. But because well-qualified, moderate nominees warrant thorough consideration and final ballots, their Senate review deserves analysis, which this paper conducts by emphasizing Millett. It first surveys the nominee’s process and then shows how her evaluation concluded.
To The Victor Goes The Toil -- Remedies For Regulated Parties In Separation-Of-Powers Litigation, Kent H. Barnett
To The Victor Goes The Toil -- Remedies For Regulated Parties In Separation-Of-Powers Litigation, Kent H. Barnett
Scholarly Works
The U.S. Constitution imposes three key limits on the design of federal agencies. It constrains how agency officers are appointed, the extent of their independence from the President, and the range of issues that they can decide. Scholars have trumpeted the importance of these safeguards with soaring rhetoric. And the Supreme Court has permitted regulated parties to vindicate these safeguards through implied private rights of action under the Constitution. Regulated parties, for their part, have been successfully challenging agency structure with increased frequency. At the same time, regulated parties, courts, and scholars have largely ignored the practical question of “structural …