Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of Leavitt V. Siems, 130 Adv. Nev. Op. 54, Michael Paretti
Summary Of Leavitt V. Siems, 130 Adv. Nev. Op. 54, Michael Paretti
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court concluded that: (1) expert alternative causation testimony is permissible; (2) ex parte communication, even when improper, only warrants a new trial when prejudice is established; and, (3) an employee’s default may not be used against an employer codefendant contesting liability.
Summary Of L.V. Dev. Assocs. V. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 37, Ryan Becklean
Summary Of L.V. Dev. Assocs. V. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 37, Ryan Becklean
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether NRS 50.125 applies to depositions.
Summary Of Coleman V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 26, Ryan Becklean
Summary Of Coleman V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 26, Ryan Becklean
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined three issues: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction of first-degree murder by child abuse; (2) whether NRS 51.345 is constitutional; and (3) whether NRS 51.345 was properly applied by the trial court to exclude testimony in this case.
This Is Your Sword: How Damaging Are Prior Convictions To Plaintiffs In Civil Trials?, Kathryn M. Stanchi, Deirdre Bowen
This Is Your Sword: How Damaging Are Prior Convictions To Plaintiffs In Civil Trials?, Kathryn M. Stanchi, Deirdre Bowen
Scholarly Works
The conventional wisdom in law is that a prior conviction is one of the most powerful and damaging pieces of evidence that can be offered against a witness or party. In legal lore, prior convictions seriously undercut the credibility of the witness and can derail the outcome of a trial. This Article suggests that may not always be true.
This Article details the results of an empirical study of juror decision-making that challenges the conventional wisdom about prior convictions. In our study, the prior conviction evidence did not have a direct impact on the outcome of the civil trial or …