Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adjudication (1)
- Colombia (1)
- Continental shelf (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crime (1)
-
- Economic zone (1)
- Empirical analysis (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Employers (1)
- Federal administrative process (1)
- Flu (1)
- International courts (1)
- International legal theory (1)
- Justice System (1)
- Law and Justice (1)
- Law of the Sea (1)
- Laws and Legislation (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Maritime boundary delimitation (1)
- Methodologies (1)
- Nautical miles (1)
- Nicaragua (1)
- Retaliation claims (1)
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act (1)
- State courts (1)
- State law (1)
- Territorial dispute (1)
- United Nations Convention (1)
- University of Baltimore (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Why Whistleblowers Lose: An Empirical And Qualitative Analysis Of State Court Cases, Nancy M. Modesitt
Why Whistleblowers Lose: An Empirical And Qualitative Analysis Of State Court Cases, Nancy M. Modesitt
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article was originally intended to be an analysis of the propriety, or impropriety, of the doctrines most commonly used by courts to decide employees’ whistleblowing retaliation claims against employers. However, upon conducting initial research, it quickly became apparent that there was very little data available on whistleblowing cases. Unlike employment discrimination cases, where several empirical studies have been conducted, there is only one empirical analysis of whistleblower claims, which focused solely on outcomes in the federal administrative process for claims brought under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). That study revealed that whistleblowers fare poorly for a number of reasons, but …
The Normative Legitimacy Of International Courts, Nienke Grossman
The Normative Legitimacy Of International Courts, Nienke Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article’s objective is to spark discussion about the standards by which we judge international courts. Traditional justifications for the authority of international courts are based on outmoded assumptions of their role and impact. State consent and procedural fairness to litigants are insufficient to ground the legitimacy of institutions that may adjudicate the international rights and duties of nonlitigants, deeply affect the interests of nonlitigating stakeholders, and shape the law prospectively. These realities mandate a new approach to the legitimacy of international courts. This Article presents alternative or additional approaches for justifying the authority of international courts rooted in both …
The Fixable Flaws Of America's Civil Justice System, James Maxeiner
The Fixable Flaws Of America's Civil Justice System, James Maxeiner
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
International Decisions: Territorial And Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua V. Colombia), Nienke Grossman
International Decisions: Territorial And Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua V. Colombia), Nienke Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.