Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law (5)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Brandenburg v. Ohio (395 U.S. 444 (1969)) (1)
- Contempt of Legislative Bodies (1)
- Crime (1)
-
- Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) (1)
- Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington (1)
- Freedom of Speech (1)
- Freedom of the Press (1)
- Greene v. Fisher (1)
- Howes v. Fields (1)
- Incitement (1)
- Judicial Process (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Maples v. Thomas (1)
- Messerschmidt v. Millender (1)
- Right to Trial by Jury (1)
- Smith v. Louisiana (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Williams v. Illinois (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Remarks Of William Van Alstyne On The Brandenburg Panel, William W. Van Alstyne
Remarks Of William Van Alstyne On The Brandenburg Panel, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Criminal, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Criminal, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
The Interpretive Authority Of Consensus In The Lower Courts, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
The Interpretive Authority Of Consensus In The Lower Courts, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Rule Of Lenity As A Rule Of Federalism, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
The Rule Of Lenity As A Rule Of Federalism, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Waiting For Davis V. United States -- Or Not Waiting, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Waiting For Davis V. United States -- Or Not Waiting, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Did The Supreme Court Recently Exercise A Power That Had Lain Dormant For Decades?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Did The Supreme Court Recently Exercise A Power That Had Lain Dormant For Decades?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
12 Unnecessary Men: The Case For Eliminating Jury Trials In Drunk Driving Cases, Adam M. Gershowitz
12 Unnecessary Men: The Case For Eliminating Jury Trials In Drunk Driving Cases, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
Over the last few decades, states have imposed tougher punishments on drunk drivers. This Article argues that increasing punishments is counterproductive. If legislatures are seeking to hold guilty offenders accountable and deter drunk driving, they should keep punishments low and instead abolish the right to jury trials. Under the petty offense doctrine, the Supreme Court has authorized states to abolish jury trials when defendants face a maximum sentence of six months’ incarceration. Social science evidence has long demonstrated that judges are more likely to convict than juries, particularly in drunk driving cases. And researchers have found that the certainty of …
Contempt Of Congress, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Contempt Of Congress, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.