Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
- Business (3)
- Technology and Innovation (3)
- Economics (2)
-
- Law and Economics (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Computer Sciences (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Public Economics (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Software Engineering (1)
- Tax Law (1)
- Torts (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Torts And Innovation, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
Torts And Innovation, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
All Faculty Scholarship
This Essay exposes and analyzes a hitherto overlooked cost of the current design of tort law: its adverse effect on innovation. Tort liability for negligence, defective products, and medical malpractice is determined by reference to custom. We demonstrate that courts’ reliance on custom and conventional technologies as the benchmark of liability chills innovation and distorts its path. Specifically, the recourse to custom taxes innovators and subsidizes replicators of conventional technologies. We explore the causes and consequences of this phenomenon and propose two possible ways to modify tort law in order to make it more welcoming to innovation.
Schumpeterian Competition And Antitrust, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Schumpeterian Competition And Antitrust, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
Joseph Schumpeter's vision of competition saw it as a destructive process in which effort, assets and fortunes were continuously destroyed by innovation. One possible implication is that antitrust's attention on short-run price and output issues is myopic: what seems at first glance to be a monopolistic exclusionary practice might really be an innovative enterprise with enormous payoffs in the long run. While this may be the case, three qualifications are critical. First, one must not confuse the prospect of innovation with the scope of the intellectual property laws; their excesses and special interest capture cast serious doubt on the proposition …
'Dynamic Competition' Does Not Excuse Monopolization, Jonathan Baker
'Dynamic Competition' Does Not Excuse Monopolization, Jonathan Baker
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This comment on a forthcoming article by Keith Hylton and David Evans explains why considerations of "dynamic competition" do not argue against antitrust enforcement. While the prospect of achieving monopoly may foster innovation, that observation misleads as to appropriate antitrust policy unless qualified by the observation that the push of competition generally spurs innovation more than the pull of monopoly. Moreover, the longstanding doctrinal rule that mere monopoly pricing is not illegal should not be read as demonstrating that antitrust law values monopolies for their role in promoting innovation.
Viewing Virtual Property Ownership Through The Lens Of Innovation, Ryan G. Vacca
Viewing Virtual Property Ownership Through The Lens Of Innovation, Ryan G. Vacca
Akron Law Faculty Publications
Over the past several years scholars have wrestled with how property rights in items created in virtual worlds should be conceptualized. Regardless of how the property is conceptualized and what property theory best fits, most agree the law ought to recognize virtual property as property and vest someone with those rights.
This article moves beyond the conceptualization debate and asks two new questions from a new perspective. First, how ought virtual property rights be allocated so innovation and creativity can be maximized? Second, how can the law be changed to remove barriers that unnecessarily impede a regime that maximizes creativity …
Securities Class Actions As Pragmatic Ex Post Regulation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Securities Class Actions As Pragmatic Ex Post Regulation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
Securities class actions are on the chopping block-again. Traditional commentators continue to view class actions with suspicion; they see class suits as nonmeritorious byproducts of self-interest and the attorneys who bring them as rent-seekers. Their conventional approach has popularized securities class actions' negative effects. High-profile commissions capitalizing on this rhetoric, such as the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, have recently recommended eliminating or severely curtailing securities class actions. But this approach misses the point: in the ongoing push and pull of securities regulation, corporations are winning the battle.
Thus, understanding the full picture and texture of securities class actions necessitates …
Teaching Ip From An Entrepreneurial Counseling And Transactional Perspective, Sean M. O'Connor
Teaching Ip From An Entrepreneurial Counseling And Transactional Perspective, Sean M. O'Connor
Articles
The traditional law school appellate case method is not well-suited to teaching students either the substance and process of counseling entrepreneurial clients or helping such clients create IP strategies that effectively advance their business vision. This Article describes the author’s creation of new courses and clinics to advance teaching IP in the emerging field of entrepreneurship and innovation law
Viewing Virtual Property Ownership Through The Lens Of Innovation, Ryan G. Vacca
Viewing Virtual Property Ownership Through The Lens Of Innovation, Ryan G. Vacca
Law Faculty Scholarship
Over the past several years scholars have wrestled with how property rights in items created in virtual worlds should be conceptualized. Regardless of how the property is conceptualized and what property theory best fits, most agree the law ought to recognize virtual property as property and vest someone with those rights.
Intellectual Property For Market Experimentation, Michael B. Abramowicz, John F. Duffy
Intellectual Property For Market Experimentation, Michael B. Abramowicz, John F. Duffy
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
Intellectual property protects investments in the production of information, but the literature on the topic has largely neglected one type of information that intellectual property might protect: information about the market success of goods and services. A first entrant into a market often cannot prevent other firms from free-riding on information about consumer demand and market feasibility. Despite the existence of some first-mover advantages, the incentives to be the first entrant into a market may sometimes be inefficiently low, thereby giving rise to a net first-mover disadvantage and discouraging innovation. Intellectual property may counteract this inefficiency by providing market exclusivity, …
Acquiring Innovation, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Acquiring Innovation, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Articles
In recent years, the innovation market has witnessed a new business model involving companies that are mere patent holding shells and not operating entities. They have no customers or products to offer, but they do have an aggressive tactic of using patent portfolios to threaten other operating companies with potential infringement litigation. The strategy is executed with the end goal of extracting handsome settlements. Acquisitions of patents for offensive use have become a major concern to operating companies because such acquisitions pose the threats of patent injunction, interrupting the business and crippling further innovation.
While many operating companies today know …
Innovation And Corporate Governance: The Impact Of Sarbanes-Oxley, Houman B. Shadab
Innovation And Corporate Governance: The Impact Of Sarbanes-Oxley, Houman B. Shadab
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.