Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hearing: Civil Rights Division Oversight, Helen L. Norton
Hearing: Civil Rights Division Oversight, Helen L. Norton
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Oversight Hearing On The Federal Superfund Program's Activities To Protect Public Health, Rena I. Steinzor
Oversight Hearing On The Federal Superfund Program's Activities To Protect Public Health, Rena I. Steinzor
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Oversight Hearing On The Election Assistance Commission, David A. Super
Oversight Hearing On The Election Assistance Commission, David A. Super
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Stifling Or Stimulating - The Role Of Gene Patents In Research And Genetic Testing, Lawrence M. Sung
Stifling Or Stimulating - The Role Of Gene Patents In Research And Genetic Testing, Lawrence M. Sung
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Testimony Of Robert V. Percival Regarding The Scope Of Federal Jurisdiction Under The Clean Water Act, Robert V. Percival
Testimony Of Robert V. Percival Regarding The Scope Of Federal Jurisdiction Under The Clean Water Act, Robert V. Percival
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Excessive Speculation In The Natural Gas Market, Michael Greenberger
Excessive Speculation In The Natural Gas Market, Michael Greenberger
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Protecting Workers From Genetic Discrimination, Karen H. Rothenberg
Protecting Workers From Genetic Discrimination, Karen H. Rothenberg
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Energy Speculation: Is Greater Regulation Necessary To Stop Price Manipulation?, Michael Greenberger
Energy Speculation: Is Greater Regulation Necessary To Stop Price Manipulation?, Michael Greenberger
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Review Of The Coast Guard's Administrative Law System, Abraham A. Dash
Review Of The Coast Guard's Administrative Law System, Abraham A. Dash
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Holmes V. South Carolina Upholds Trial By Jury, Samuel R. Gross
Holmes V. South Carolina Upholds Trial By Jury, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
Bobby Lee Holmes was convicted of a brutal rape-murder and sentenced to death. The only evidence that connected him to the crime was forensic: a palm print, and blood and fiber evidence. (Biological samples taken from the victim for two rape kits were compromised and yielded no identifiable evidence.) Holmes claimed that the state's forensic evidence was planted and mishandled, and that the rape and murder were committed by another man, Jimmy McCaw White. At a pretrial hearing three witnesses testified that they saw White near the victim's house at about the time of the crime, and four others testified …
Crawford, Davis, And Way Beyond, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford, Davis, And Way Beyond, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Until 1965, the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution hardly mattered. It was not applicable against the states, and therefore had no role whatsoever in the vast majority of prosecutions. Moreover, if a federal court was inclined to exclude evidence of an out-of-court statement, it made little practical difference whether the court termed the statement hearsay or held that the evidence did not comply with the Confrontation Clause.
Crawford And Davis: A Personal Reflection, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford And Davis: A Personal Reflection, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
I have to say that when I stood up to argue Hammon I felt the wind at my back. I was basically a lawyer with an easy case, and there wasn't anything particularly unpredictable at the argument of Hammon. Now it got a little bit interesting, as I will explain later, because to a certain extent I was trying to argue the other case as well. But Hammon itself was sort of ordinary, normal law.
Forfeiture Of The Confrontation Right After Crawford And Davis, Richard D. Friedman
Forfeiture Of The Confrontation Right After Crawford And Davis, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
So my topic this morning is on forfeiture of the confrontation right, which I think plays a central role in confrontation doctrine. And to try to present that, let me state the entirety of confrontation doctrine as briefly as I can. This is, at least, what I think the doctrine is and what it can be: A testimonial statement should not be admissible against an accused to prove the truth of what it asserts unless the accused either has had or will have an opportunity to confront the witness-which should occur at trial unless the witness is then unavailable-or has …