Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of In The Matter Of The Estate Of John W. Bowlds, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 100, Kristen T. Gallagher
Summary Of In The Matter Of The Estate Of John W. Bowlds, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 100, Kristen T. Gallagher
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from both parties regarding a court’s review of fee agreements between an estate and its attorneys.
Summary Of State V. Sutton, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 99, Kristen T. Gallagher
Summary Of State V. Sutton, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 99, Kristen T. Gallagher
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a final judgment from a breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in an employment law case.
Summary Of United Insurance Company Of America Vs. Chapman, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 83, Ryan Hall
Summary Of United Insurance Company Of America Vs. Chapman, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 83, Ryan Hall
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the prejudgment interest awarded to Chapman should have been calculated pursuant to the specific interest statute, rather than the general interest statute, because the special interest statute was in effect when the judgment was entered. The district court had erred by awarding the attorney fees to Chapman, because United’s claim was brought on reasonable ground. The award of postjudgment interest awarded to Chapman was also reversed.
Summary Of Middleton Vs. Warden, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 74, Ryan Hall
Summary Of Middleton Vs. Warden, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 74, Ryan Hall
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Nevada Supreme Court removed Middleton’s appointed appellate counsel due to substandard representation. On initial review, the Nevada Supreme Court ordered Middleton's counsel to submit an amended brief, limited to 80 pages. Counsel's "amended" brief was simply the original brief with the final few pages removed so as to meet the 80-page requirement. Counsel had repeatedly violated court orders, and the work product he ultimately submitted was unacceptable for representation of a client who was facing a death sentence.
Summary Of Bohlmann V. Printz, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 62, Z. Ryan Pahnke
Summary Of Bohlmann V. Printz, 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 62, Z. Ryan Pahnke
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Pan V. Eighth Judicial District Court, 120 Nev. Adv.Op.No.26, Ronda Heilig
Summary Of Pan V. Eighth Judicial District Court, 120 Nev. Adv.Op.No.26, Ronda Heilig
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
When all of the “prerequisites for finality are met, an order that dismisses a case for forum non conveniens is a final judgment that should be reviewed on appeal,”2 and not via a petition for a writ of mandamus.
Summary Of Attorney General V. Nos, 120 Nev. Adv. Op. 11, Christopher W. Carson
Summary Of Attorney General V. Nos, 120 Nev. Adv. Op. 11, Christopher W. Carson
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
No abstract provided.
Summary Of State, Div. Child & Family Servs. V. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 50, Shane Jasmine Young
Summary Of State, Div. Child & Family Servs. V. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 50, Shane Jasmine Young
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The State sought a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging the district court’s oral contempt order and sanctions.
Summary Of Rickard V. Montgomery Ward & Co., 120 Nev. Ad. Op. 54, Amanda Yen
Summary Of Rickard V. Montgomery Ward & Co., 120 Nev. Ad. Op. 54, Amanda Yen
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
On January 23, 1993, appellant David Rickard was involved in an incident at the Montgomery Ward store. On April 20, 1993, he filed a complaint in the Clark County District Court alleging various claims against the store. Approximately four years after the complaint was filed in court, Ward filed a chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding with the United States Bankruptcy Court in the District of Delaware. In accordance with federal bankruptcy law, Rickard’s action in the Nevada district court was stayed. On August 25, 1998, Rickard filed a motion for relief from stay in order to further his action against Ward. …
Summary Of Health Plan Of Nev., Inc. V. Rainbow Medical, Llc, Matt Wagner
Summary Of Health Plan Of Nev., Inc. V. Rainbow Medical, Llc, Matt Wagner
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This case was an appeal and cross-appeal dealing with Nevada’s Uniform Arbitration Act and the scope of judicial review of an arbitration award.