Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (10)
- Land Use Law (8)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
- Constitutional Law (4)
-
- Legal Education (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Environmental Law (6)
- NYLJ (6)
- Land use (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (3)
-
- Legal Education (3)
- Takings (3)
- Citizen suits (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Ethics (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Legal education (2)
- MacCrate (2)
- Property-Personal and Real (2)
- Advocacy (1)
- Affirmative defense (1)
- Apprendi (1)
- Careers (1)
- Charities (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crime (1)
- Cultural property (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- EIS (1)
- Estate Planning and Probate (1)
Articles 31 - 38 of 38
Full-Text Articles in Law
Exonerations Change Judicial View On Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Adele Bernhard
Exonerations Change Judicial View On Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Adele Bernhard
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Dying Twice: Incarceration On Death Row, Michael B. Mushlin
Dying Twice: Incarceration On Death Row, Michael B. Mushlin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Dying Twice is an important report. The work is a collaboration between the Corrections Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, which I chaired, and the Committee on Capital Punishment of the Association chaired by Norman Greene. The working group that researched and wrote the report was drawn from members of both committees. The attorneys and the physician who served on the committee are wonderful, talented, dedicated people. It was a pleasure to work with professionals of this caliber on such an important effort. Dying Twice was endorsed as the position of the Association …
Piney Run: The Permits Are Not What They Seem, Jessica Owley Lippmann
Piney Run: The Permits Are Not What They Seem, Jessica Owley Lippmann
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Annual Review Of Environmental And Natural Resources Law, Jessica Owley Lippmann
Foreword: Annual Review Of Environmental And Natural Resources Law, Jessica Owley Lippmann
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Response To Russell Pearce, John A. Humbach
A Response To Russell Pearce, John A. Humbach
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
There is not very much to criticize in what Professor Pearce has said about the MacCrate Report. Mostly, therefore, I will just amplify some of the points that I regard as among the most important. Before that, however, I want to mention some quibbles. First, I have always been bothered a bit when people describe the lawyer's role as that of a hired gun. The term “hired gun” is (if you'll pardon the expression) loaded. It does not, moreover, correctly capture either the good or the questionable of what lawyers actually try to do when representing their clients. Real hired …
The Takings Clause And The Separation Of Powers: An Essay, John A. Humbach
The Takings Clause And The Separation Of Powers: An Essay, John A. Humbach
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The most fundamental environmental problem is this: across our nation there are literally hundreds of millions of acres of important natural resource lands-- farms, forests, wetlands, reservoir watersheds, shore lands, endangered species habitat--lands that have relatively little commercial value in their present natural condition, but which would have much greater commercial value if their natural values were degraded or destroyed. Stated differently, private property often will yield a much greater profit to its owner if it is used in ways that will harm or obliterate important environmental assets and values. For this reason, private owners are understandably tempted to supplant …
Two Sides Of A "Sargasso Sea": Successive Prosecution For The "Same Offence" In The United States And The United Kingdom, Lissa Griffin
Two Sides Of A "Sargasso Sea": Successive Prosecution For The "Same Offence" In The United States And The United Kingdom, Lissa Griffin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This article analyzes the U. S. constitutional law interpreting the concept of “same offence.” Included is a survey of the Supreme Court's attempts to interpret constitutional text in order to provide adequate protection for the underlying double jeopardy interest against vexatious reprosecutions, which have frequently produced inconsistent and illogical results. Part III of this article analyzes U.K. law relating to the concept of “same offence,” where the same narrow double jeopardy protection adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court is supplemented with a broad discretion to prevent unfair successive prosecution that constitutes an abuse of process. Part IV draws lessons from …
Defining The Project Purpose Under Nepa: Promoting Consideration Of Viable Eis Alternatives, Jason J. Czarnezki
Defining The Project Purpose Under Nepa: Promoting Consideration Of Viable Eis Alternatives, Jason J. Czarnezki
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Comment examines how courts should construe EIS project goals under NEPA. Part I provides the basic foundation for EIS alternative analysis by outlining NEPA's goals, framework, and legal development. Part II identifies and discusses two conflicting positions in current case law supporting narrow versus general goal formulations in project purpose evaluation. To resolve this conflict, Part III suggests that courts should reject the narrow formulation in evaluating a project's purpose and objectively inquire into the effect and purpose of the agency's action.