Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Natural resources (2)
- Allotment (1)
- American Indians (1)
- Antiquities Act (1)
- Class (1)
-
- Energy (1)
- John Wesley Powell (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judicial supremacy (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legal aid (1)
- Legal formalism (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legal services (1)
- Legalism (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- National monuments (1)
- National parks (1)
- Political realism (1)
- Poverty law (1)
- Tribal sovereignty (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Wallace Stegner (1)
- Water (1)
- Wealth (1)
- West (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Filling In The Blank Spots On Powell's And Stegner's Maps: The Role Of Modern Indian Tribes In Western Watersheds, Charles Wilkinson
Filling In The Blank Spots On Powell's And Stegner's Maps: The Role Of Modern Indian Tribes In Western Watersheds, Charles Wilkinson
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Monumental Legacy Of The Antiquities Act Of 1906, Mark Squillace
The Monumental Legacy Of The Antiquities Act Of 1906, Mark Squillace
Publications
The Antiquities Act of 1906 authorizes the President of the United States "to declare by public proclamation, historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon [federal] lands . . . to be national monuments . . . " The law was passed during the Theodore Roosevelt administration, and Roosevelt quickly set about designating a wide range of lands and resources as national monuments, including notably, the 800,000 acre Grand Canyon National Monument. Roosevelt's expansive interpretation of the law was embraced by later presidents and ultimately by the Supreme Court. In …
A Short History Of Poverty Lawyers In The United States, Deborah J. Cantrell
A Short History Of Poverty Lawyers In The United States, Deborah J. Cantrell
Publications
No abstract provided.
Marbury V. Madison And Modern Judicial Review, Robert F. Nagel
Marbury V. Madison And Modern Judicial Review, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
This Article compares the realist critique of Marbury with several revisionist defenses of that decision. Realists claim to see Marbury as essentially political and thus as the fountainhead of modern judicial review. Revisionists claim to see the decision as legalistically justified and thus inconsistent with current practices. Close examination, however, indicates that, despite sharp rhetorical differences, these two accounts are largely complementary rather than inconsistent. Each envisions Marbury as embodying elements of both political realism and legal formalism. Once the false argument about whether Marbury was either political or legal is put aside, it is possible to trace the influence …