Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual Property Clause (2)
- AIDS (1)
- Access to essential medicine (1)
- American law (1)
- Biopiracy (1)
-
- Canadian law (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Developing countries (1)
- Foreign use of invention (1)
- Geographic disparity (1)
- Geographical limitation on prior art (1)
- HIV (1)
- Indigenous holders of knowledge (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- International law (1)
- Mexican law (1)
- NAFTA (1)
- New Trademark Law of Spain (1)
- North american Free Trade Agreement (1)
- Novelty (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent law (1)
- Patents (1)
- Pharmaceutical companies (1)
- Public accessibility (1)
- Public domain (1)
- Roberto Rosas (1)
- Section 102 (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Trademarks Under The North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta) With References To The New Trademark Law Of Spain, Effective July 31, 2002, And The Current Mexican Law, Roberto Rosas
Faculty Articles
A trademark is any distinctive sign indicating that certain products or services have been manufactured or rendered by a specific person or company. This concept is currently recognized worldwide; however, the origin of trademarks dates back to antiquity when artisans placed their signatures or “marks” on their products containing an artistic or utilitarian element. Through time, these marks have evolved to such an extent that today, a reliable and efficient system for their registration and protection has been established. Besides protecting owners of trademarks, this system also helps consumers identify and purchase goods or services, which, because of the essence …
Legal Movements In Intellectual Property: Trips, Unilateral Action, Bilateral Agreements, And Hiv/Aids, Margo A. Bagley
Legal Movements In Intellectual Property: Trips, Unilateral Action, Bilateral Agreements, And Hiv/Aids, Margo A. Bagley
Faculty Articles
This Article begins with an overview of the relationship between the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the "TRIPS Agreement") and the HIV/AIDS pandemic which created the need for the Doha Declaration. It then discusses two trade-related movements, unilateral action and TRIPS-plus bilateral agreements, that call into question the long-term effectiveness of the TRIPS Agreement process, generally, and the benefits of the Doha Declaration, in particular, in addressing multiple facets of the access to essential medicines problem. This Article concludes that a consideration of these issues should be included in the development of any further TRIPS-related solutions to …
Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitation On Prior Art In A Small World, Margo A. Bagley
Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitation On Prior Art In A Small World, Margo A. Bagley
Faculty Articles
Part I of this Article provides an overview of § 102 of the Patent Act, the role of prior art in the patentability analysis, and the origin of the limitation on relevant non-patent, nonpublished art to that existing "in this country." Part II then analyzes the constitutional deficiency of the limitation in light of the express and implied purposes of the Intellectual Property Clause as informed by judicial decisions, technological changes, global contraction, and expanded notions of inventive research sources. Policy concerns are the focus of Part III, which discusses how § 102's geographical limitation facilitates forms of "biopiracy," conflicts …
Still Patently Unconstitutional: A Reply To Professor Nard, Margo A. Bagley
Still Patently Unconstitutional: A Reply To Professor Nard, Margo A. Bagley
Faculty Articles
In Defense of Geographic Disparity is Professor Craig Nard's response to my article Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitation on Prior Art in a Small World (Patently Unconstitutional). According to Professor Nard, my article advocates "the elimination of [the] geographic disparity" of 35 U.S.C § 102 in order to "protect developing nations and indigenous peoples from Western countries' patent law regimes." Professor Nard is correct in his assertion that I seek the elimination of the geographical disparity in U.S. patent law; however, he misses the mark as to my reasons. My opposition to the geographical limitation does not derive from …