Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (12)
- State law; State administrative decision; (12)
- Land Use (2)
- Public Land Law (2)
- Public Lands (2)
-
- United States (2)
- Acid Rain Program (1)
- Cap-and-trade (1)
- Clean Air Act Amendments (1)
- Concord Oil v. Pennzoil Exploration & Production Co. (1)
- Conflicting fractions (1)
- Double fractions (1)
- Grandfathering (1)
- Interpretation of multiclause deeds (1)
- Investment tax credit (1)
- Laura Burney (1)
- Mineral/royalty problem (1)
- National Ass’n v. Alexander (1)
- New Source Review (1)
- One-sixteenth mineral interest (1)
- Restated fractions (1)
- St. Mary's University School of Law (1)
- Subsidies (1)
- Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp. v. Henderson Family Partnership (1)
- The French Decision (1)
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 52, Summer 2001, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 52, Summer 2001, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)
No abstract provided.
Reducing Emissions From The Electricity Generation Industry: Can We Finally Do It?, Shi-Ling Hsu
Reducing Emissions From The Electricity Generation Industry: Can We Finally Do It?, Shi-Ling Hsu
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0774: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0774: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-98 & 2006-121
Appeal No. 0687: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0687: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-51 & 2000-52
Appeal No. 0688: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0688: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-51 & 2000-52
Appeal No. 0697: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0697: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-153
Appeal No. 0685: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0685: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 3000-22
Appeal No. 0698: Bt Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0698: Bt Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-154
Recent Developments In Natural Resources Law - Circa 2000-01, Thomas A. Daily
Recent Developments In Natural Resources Law - Circa 2000-01, Thomas A. Daily
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0692: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0692: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Letter, re: Han No. 1
Appeal No. 0691: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0691: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-88 & Chief's Order 2000-90
Appeal No. 0696: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0696: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-125
Appeal No. 0690: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0690: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-88 & Chief's Order 2000-90
Appeal No. 0673: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0673: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 99-115 & 99-116
Appeal No. 0672: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0672: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 99-115 & 99-116
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 51, Winter/Spring Issue, Mar. 2001, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 51, Winter/Spring Issue, Mar. 2001, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)
No abstract provided.
Interpreting Mineral And Royalty Deeds: The Legacy Of The One-Eighth Royalty And Other Stories, Laura H. Burney
Interpreting Mineral And Royalty Deeds: The Legacy Of The One-Eighth Royalty And Other Stories, Laura H. Burney
Faculty Articles
Mineral and royalty deeds are notoriously difficult to interpret. Courts complicate the interpretive process in at least two ways. First, they produce opinions that fail to appreciate and explain unique oil and gas concepts. Second, they render deed records unreliable. A variety of title problems flow from this instability. However, a common trait is frequently encountered: the influence of the one-eighth royalty provision typically used for decades in oil and gas leases. Unfortunately, courts have failed to acknowledge this influence. For this reason, title litigation will continue to loom under the legacy of the one-eighth royalty, and title examiners will …