Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Theory And Practice Of Defending Judges Against Unjust Criticism, Ronald J. Bacigal Oct 1990

The Theory And Practice Of Defending Judges Against Unjust Criticism, Ronald J. Bacigal

Law Faculty Publications

Having set forth the above premise and conclusion, the American Bar Association Subcommittee on Unjust Criticism of the Bench promulgated a model program for bar associations to follow when countering inaccurate or unjust criticism of judges. This article presents no quarrel with the model program but instead seeks to relate the model to an empirical account of how it might operate in practice. It must be remembered that the acid test of a theoretical model is not whether the theory is "true" in a purely academic sense but whether the model is useful in describing the "real world. " In …


Appointment Controversies And The Supreme Court, Stephen Wermiel Jan 1990

Appointment Controversies And The Supreme Court, Stephen Wermiel

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

No abstract provided.


Defining The Role Of Federal Courts, Erwin Chemerinsky, Larry Kramer Jan 1990

Defining The Role Of Federal Courts, Erwin Chemerinsky, Larry Kramer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Review Of "Honorable Justice: The Life Of Oliver Wendell Holmes" By S. Novick, James J. Fishman Jan 1990

Review Of "Honorable Justice: The Life Of Oliver Wendell Holmes" By S. Novick, James J. Fishman

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Memorial Service: Judge James T. Foley, Roger J. Miner '56 Jan 1990

Memorial Service: Judge James T. Foley, Roger J. Miner '56

Judges

No abstract provided.


Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel Jan 1990

Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

As the juxtaposition of these quotations suggests, judges have long held disparate views on the legitimacy and value of “public policy” considerations as a basis for legal decision making. The popular notion posits that Justice Holmes and legal realists carried the day, making public policy analysis an ordinary part of the adjudication process. The story, of course, is more complex than this legal version of Don Quixote. Many judges and lawyers, including Justice Holmes in other writings, continued to speak of adjudication in more formalist and positivist terms, with most laypersons in apparent agreement. Judge Burroughs' view of public policy …