Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Insanity defense (2)
- Insanity plea (2)
- John Hinckley Jr. (2)
- Classroom (1)
- College (1)
-
- College students (1)
- College women (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal Sentencing (1)
- Criminal defenses (1)
- Dating (1)
- Forensic psychiatry (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law professors (1)
- Law students (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Legal insanity (1)
- Mental Health Law (1)
- Misperceptions (1)
- NGRI (1)
- Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (1)
- Psychology and Psychiatry (1)
- Relationships (1)
- Self-esteem (1)
- Violence (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Violence In College Students' Dating Relationships, Carol K. Sigelman, Carol E. Jordan-Berry, Katharine A. Wiles
Violence In College Students' Dating Relationships, Carol K. Sigelman, Carol E. Jordan-Berry, Katharine A. Wiles
Office for Policy Studies on Violence Against Women Publications
In a survey of 504 college students examining predictors of violence in heterosexual relationships, over half of both men and women had committed at least one physically violent act. Modest associations between physical violence and sexual aggression were uncovered. In a series of discriminant analyses, men who abused their partners were not readily distinguished from men who did not, but tended to by young, low in family income, traditional in attitudes toward women, abused as children, currently living with a women, and from Appalachian areas.
Looking At Law, Carol Weisbrod
Justice, Mercy, And Craziness, Stephen J. Morse
Justice, Mercy, And Craziness, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Public Opinion Of Forensic Psychiatry Following The Hinckley Verdict, Dan Slater, Valerie P. Hans
Public Opinion Of Forensic Psychiatry Following The Hinckley Verdict, Dan Slater, Valerie P. Hans
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The authors obtained opinions of forensic psychiatry in a community survey following the not guilty by reason of insanity verdict in the Hinckley trial. A majority of respondents expressed little or no confidence in the specific psychiatric testimony in the Hinckley trial and only modest faith in the general ability of psychiatrists to determine legal insanity. Respondents' general and specific attitudes were strongly related. Younger people and women were more positive in their views of psychiatry in the courtroom.
"Plain Crazy:" Lay Definitions Of Legal Insanity, Valerie P. Hans, Dan Slater
"Plain Crazy:" Lay Definitions Of Legal Insanity, Valerie P. Hans, Dan Slater
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The 1982 Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) verdict in the trial of John Hinckley, Jr., would-be assassin of President Reagan, again has brought to the forefront long-standing public dissatisfaction in the United States with the insanity plea. In the wake of the Hinckley verdict, proposals for reform or abolition of the insanity defense have been submitted to both houses of the U.S. Congress and to state legislatures throughout the nation (Cunningham, 1983). Fueling this reform movement is apparent public dissatisfaction with the insanity plea as it is currently defined.
In contrast to voluminous literature concerning legal and psychiatric …
Invisible Teachers: A Comment On Perceptions In The Classroom, Robert F. Nagel
Invisible Teachers: A Comment On Perceptions In The Classroom, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Undiminished Confusion In Diminished Capacity, Stephen J. Morse
Undiminished Confusion In Diminished Capacity, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.