Law Commons^™

Reply Brief Of Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie, And Steilacoom Tribes

Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982))

No abstract provided.

Brief For The United States In Opposition

Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982))

No abstract provided.

Judicial Review Of Risk Assessments: The Role Of Decision Theory In Unscrambling The Benzene Decision, William H. Rodgers, Jr.

Articles

[Reprinted in 13 Land Use & Envtl. L. Rev. 629-48 (1982).]

Brief Of Respondent The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington In Opposition To Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982))

No abstract provided.

Reply Brief Of Appellants

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982))

No abstract provided.

Appendix To Reply Brief Of Appellants

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982))

No abstract provided.

Appellant's Reply Brief

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.

Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982))

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee Indian Tribes

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982))

No abstract provided.

Brief For Appellee United States

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982))

No abstract provided.

Brief In Opposition To Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Makah Indian Tribe v. Lower Elwha Tribe, Docket No. 81-115 (454 U.S. 862 (1981))

No abstract provided.

Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Makah Indian Tribe v. Lower Elwha Tribe, Docket No. 81-115 (454 U.S. 862 (1981))

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Appellant

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982))

No abstract provided.

Is Washington Ready For Merit Selection Of Judges, Hugh D. Spitzer, William S. Bailey

Articles

In 1980, Seattle established a judicial merit selection process for the Seattle Municipal Court, based on an approach used in many other jurisdictions and by the federal government under President Carter. The Seattle plan represents the first time a merit selection commission of lawyers and lay people has been used for nonfederal appointments in Washington. The two individuals subsequently appointed to the Seattle Municipal Court have gone through one of this state's most rigorous judicial selection processes.

In this article, we will review how judges are presently selected in this state, the various methods of choosing judges in other jurisdictions …