Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
87-3085-Doc-22: Palestine Information Office V. Shultz (D.D.C.), Files Of D.C. District Court Judge Charles R. Richey
87-3085-Doc-22: Palestine Information Office V. Shultz (D.D.C.), Files Of D.C. District Court Judge Charles R. Richey
Judge Charles R. Richey Archive
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0025: Pete Karas And Wanda Karas V. State Of Ohio, Acting By And Through The Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0025: Pete Karas And Wanda Karas V. State Of Ohio, Acting By And Through The Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Adjudication Order No. 229
The Ohio Bill Of Rights, Paul C. Giannelli
Eyewitness Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli
Eyewitness Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli
Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Proposed Ohio Rules Of Evidence: The General Assembly, Evidence, And Rulemaking, Paul C. Giannelli
The Proposed Ohio Rules Of Evidence: The General Assembly, Evidence, And Rulemaking, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the proposed Ohio Rules of Evidence. Moreover, the office of the Attorney General has opposed the proposed Rules in an article published in this review. The author examines the arguments against the Rules and concludes that the supreme court has the constitutional authority to prescribe most rules of evidence and that the General Assembly should accept the proposed Rules with amendments.