Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Roemer V. Board Of Public Works Of Maryland, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1975

Roemer V. Board Of Public Works Of Maryland, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Hills V. Gautreaux, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Oct 1975

Hills V. Gautreaux, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 V. Hortonville Education Association, Lewis F. Powell Jr Oct 1975

Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 V. Hortonville Education Association, Lewis F. Powell Jr

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Montanye V. Haymes, Lewis F. Powell, Jr. Oct 1975

Montanye V. Haymes, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Thoughts On Rodriguez: Mr. Justice Powell And The Demise Of Equal Protection Analysis In The Supreme Court, Larry Yackle Jan 1975

Thoughts On Rodriguez: Mr. Justice Powell And The Demise Of Equal Protection Analysis In The Supreme Court, Larry Yackle

Faculty Scholarship

Since the fall of 1969 when Warren Earl Burger took his seat as Chief Justice, the academic community has placed the Supreme Court under a thorough and searching examination. Coming on the heels of enormous and far-reaching activity in the judicial branch, the Burger Court has been called to account for both its adherence to and its rejection of the Warren Court's innovations in constitutional adjudication. The purpose of this article is to continue that constructive criticism by taking stock, after five years, of the Court's performance in one significant class of cases-those interpreting the equal protection clause of the …


Racial Preferences In Higher Education: Political Responsibility And The Judicial Role, Terrance Sandalow Jan 1975

Racial Preferences In Higher Education: Political Responsibility And The Judicial Role, Terrance Sandalow

Articles

Controversy continues unabated over the question left unresolved by DeFunis v. Odegaard: whether in its admissions process a state law school may accord preferential treatment to certain racial and ethnic minorities. In the pages of two journals published by the University of Chicago, Professors John Hart Ely and Richard Posner have established diametrically opposed positions in the debate. Their contributions are of special interest because each undertakes to answer the question within the framework of a theory concerning the proper distribution of authority between the judiciary and the other institutions of government. Neither position, in my judgment, adequately confronts the …