Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; Sentencing; (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Commonwealth of Kentucky (2)
- Crime (2)
- Criminal (2)
-
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Kentucky (2)
- Right to counsel (2)
- Search (2)
- Adequate notice (1)
- Attorney-police relationships (1)
- Automobile (1)
- Automobile inventory search (1)
- Bail (1)
- Bail reform (1)
- Car (1)
- Car search (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; Sentencing (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Conviction record (1)
- Corrections law (1)
- Counsel (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
- De facto discrimination (1)
- Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (1)
- Dispositional information (1)
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States V. Maccollom, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Maccollom, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Mandujano, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Mandujano, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Jurek V. Texas, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Proffitt V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Proffitt V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Stone V. Powell, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Woodson V. North Carolina, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Woodson V. North Carolina, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Gregg V, Georgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Tsc Industries Inc. V. Northway, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Tsc Industries Inc. V. Northway, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Kentucky Law Survey: Criminal Procedure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Kentucky Law Survey: Criminal Procedure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In 1974, the Kentucky Court of Appeals decided a number of criminal procedure cases. Although these included cases involving prisoners’ rights, probation revocation procedure, and discovery, the more significant decisions were in the area of the right of effective assistance of counsel and the area of search and seizure. It is to these latter two areas that the author will limit his discussion.
Kentucky Law Survey: Criminal Procedure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Kentucky Law Survey: Criminal Procedure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article provides a survey of Kentucky legal developments in the area of criminal procedure. The Kentucky Court of Appeals has had an especially active year in the criminal procedure area. Since the nature of this article does not permit extended commentary on all of the Court's decisions, discussion will be limited to the more significant cases, which deal with automobile inventory searches, waiver of constitutional rights, and plea bargaining.
Notice In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Adrienne Volenik
Notice In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
Despite these suggestions, the problem of what constitutes adequate notice continues to plague juvenile courts. Furthermore, by suggesting two criminal and two civil cases as examples, the Court added the issue of whether a civil or a criminal standard for notice should be applied. Courts that have addressed this issue have reached different conclusions.
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick Baude, James F. Gallagher
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick Baude, James F. Gallagher
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson
A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
INTRODUCTION: The doctrine of search incident to arrest provides that, as an incident to every lawful full custody arrest, law enforcement officers have an automatic right to conduct a thorough search of the arrestee and the area within his immediate control.' Although the Supreme Court has stated that the search incident to arrest exception to the fourth amendment's general requirement of a search warrant has been "settled from its first enunciation," the doctrine should be reexamined in terms of constitutional jurisprudence.
Book Review, Peter D. Garlock
Book Review, Peter D. Garlock
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The author reviews Thorns and Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States, 1825-1940.
Book Review, Emily Calhoun Carssow
Parole Revocation And The Right To Counsel, Paul W. Grimm
Parole Revocation And The Right To Counsel, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
The Burger Court has continued to relax federal constitutional restraints on the power of police and prosecutorial officials to detect and convict persons suspected of crime. During the 1973 Term, the fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure appears to have been the principal casualty of the Court's permissive attitude toward the exercise of governmental authority to enforce criminal laws. Although over half a dozen search and seizure cases were decided, in not a single one did the Court find that evidence had been obtained in violation of the fourth amendment. Other decisions narrowly interpreted the …
The Future Of Sentencing Reform: Emerging Legal Issues In The Individualization Of Justice, John C. Coffee Jr.
The Future Of Sentencing Reform: Emerging Legal Issues In The Individualization Of Justice, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
The dilemma of the American sentencing judge is qualitatively unique. Because our system of criminal justice has embraced to a degree unequaled elsewhere the rehabilitative ideal that punishment should fit not the crime, but the particular criminal, the sentencing judge must labor to fulfill the dual and sometimes conflicting roles of judge and clinician. Entrusted with enormous discretion, he is expected to "individualize" the sentence he imposes to suit the character, social history, and potential for recidivism of the offender before him. Yet, because of the general absence in our Sentencing Reform system of meaningful procedures for the appellate review …