Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Contracts (2)
- Courts (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
-
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Logic and Foundations of Mathematics (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Tax Law (1)
- Taxation-Federal (1)
- Keyword
-
- Business-purpose doctrine (1)
- Compulsory disclosure (1)
- Conditional vendee (1)
- Conditional-sale contract (1)
- Economic regulation (1)
-
- Estoppel (1)
- Guard of Honor (1)
- James Bradley Thayer (1)
- James Gould Cozzens (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Justice (1)
- Knetsch v. United States (1)
- Law enforcement agencies (1)
- Law enforcement officer (1)
- Layman Allen (1)
- Literary depictions of law (1)
- McDermott Corollary (1)
- Police (1)
- Portrayal of law in literature (1)
- Presumption of fact (1)
- Presumption of law (1)
- Public-interest standard (1)
- Rebuttable presumption (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Symbolic logic (1)
- Systematic pulverization (1)
- The Just and Unjust (1)
- Warranty liability (1)
- Wrongful repossession (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Critique Of The Business-Purpose Doctrine, Robert S. Summers
A Critique Of The Business-Purpose Doctrine, Robert S. Summers
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The aims of this article are: (1) to define the nature and significance of the business-purpose doctrine as applied in the field of Federal income taxation; (2) to summarize several considerations that support abandonment of the doctrine; and (3) to consider whether a substitute doctrine is needed. Several recent cases indicate that the influence of the business-purpose doctrine is declining, and in the recent case of Knetsch v. United States the Supreme Court appears to have substituted an alternative doctrine. The dual thesis of the present article is that the business-purpose doctrine ought to be abandoned and that there is …
Compulsory Disclosure And The First Amendment - The Scope Of Judicial Review, Robert B. Kent
Compulsory Disclosure And The First Amendment - The Scope Of Judicial Review, Robert B. Kent
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Involvement of the Supreme Court of the United States with highly charged public issues understandably occasions fresh debate concerning the proper role of the Court in determining questions of ultimate governmental power, in short, debate over the doctrine of judicial review.
As it is sometimes difficult for the judge to distinguish between what is unconstitutional and what is merely unwise, so it is difficult for the critic to disassociate his reaction to the results reached in a given case from his evaluation of the competence of the particular judicial performance. For some the failure to draw such a line robs …
Paradoxes In Law Enforcement, E. F. Roberts
Paradoxes In Law Enforcement, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Law And Literature: The Contemporary Image Of The Lawyer, Henry B. Cushing, E. F. Roberts
Law And Literature: The Contemporary Image Of The Lawyer, Henry B. Cushing, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Contracts – 1960 Oregon Survey, Robert S. Summers
Contracts – 1960 Oregon Survey, Robert S. Summers
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Commercial Law – 1960 Oregon Survey, Robert S. Summers
Commercial Law – 1960 Oregon Survey, Robert S. Summers
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Note On Symbolic Logic And The Law, Robert S. Summers
A Note On Symbolic Logic And The Law, Robert S. Summers
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Presumptions: Phenomena On The Periphery, E. F. Roberts
Presumptions: Phenomena On The Periphery, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In examining the law of evidence relative to the functions served by the device called “rebuttable presumption,” two classes of cases constantly tantalize the analyst and irritate the purist. The first concerns those instances where courts which regularly pay homage at the altar of Thayer suddenly and inexplicably send the question whether a presumption has been rebutted to the trier of fact. The second involves those courts which insist that, while the presumption mechanism does not shift the risk of non-persuasion to the opponent, the question whether the presumption has been rebutted always and quite properly ought to be decided …
Diversification Of Ownership In The Regulated Industries – The Folklore Of Regulation, Roger C. Cramton
Diversification Of Ownership In The Regulated Industries – The Folklore Of Regulation, Roger C. Cramton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.