Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

Jesse Carter Opinions

Eminent domain

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Wilson V. Beville, Jesse W. Carter Feb 1957

Wilson V. Beville, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Landowner was not required to file a claim with the city before obtaining compensation for taking a part of his property for a public street easement under the doctrine of inverse condemnation.


People Ex Rel. Department Of Public Works V. Dunn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jun 1956

People Ex Rel. Department Of Public Works V. Dunn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A trial court improperly struck a witness's evidence and instructed the jury to disregard all of his testimony regarding a lease because the lease was a proper element for consideration in a determination of compensation for a taking of property.


Harden V. Superior Court Of Alameda County, Jesse W. Carter May 1955

Harden V. Superior Court Of Alameda County, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A writ of prohibition restraining eminent domain proceedings was proper where the landowners had no remedy by appeal, the city had no authority to proceed against property outside its limits, and the superior court lacked jurisdiction in the action.