Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Articles (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Due process (1)
- Exclusion (1)
-
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- History (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Kauper (Paul) (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Michigan Bar Commissioners (1)
- Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Police (1)
- Probability (1)
- Probable Cause (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Search warrants (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Voluntary nature (1)
- Warrant application (1)
- Warrant execution (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Legislative Regulation Of Searches And Seizures: The Michigan Proposals, Jerold H. Israel
Legislative Regulation Of Searches And Seizures: The Michigan Proposals, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
IN March 1971, the Michigan Bar Commissioners appointed a twenty-five-member committee with a directive "to promulgate a recommended revision of the Code of Criminal Procedure codifying existing statutory and case law provisions which, in the judgment of the Committee, should be retained and adding thereto such provisions as the Committee, in its judgment, deems warranted; and to incorporate such recommendations into proposed legislation for submission to the Legislature."' The committee membership included judges, prosecutors, legislators, criminal defense lawyers, law school professors, and representatives of Michigan police and corrections agencies.2 Judge Horace Gilmore served as Chairman, and I served as Reporter.
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Articles
For a long time before Professor Paul Kauper wrote "Judicial Examination of the Accused" in 1932, and for a long time thereafter, the "legal mind" shut out the de facto inquisitorial system that characterized American criminal procedure. Paul Kauper could not look away. He recognized the "naked, ugly facts" (p. 1224) and was determined to do something about them -more than thirty years before Escobedo v. Illinois' or Miranda v. Arizona.2