Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Courts (2)
- Practice and Procedure (2)
- Bilateral investment treaties (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
-
- Convention against torture (1)
- Corporate charter competition (1)
- Corporate takeovers (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Deal protection measures (1)
- Delaware corporate and procedural law (1)
- Delaware courts (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Federal Reserve (1)
- Financial collapse (1)
- Foreign investors (1)
- Intent (1)
- International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) (1)
- International arbitration (1)
- International law (1)
- Intervention (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Margin of appreciation (1)
- Mergers and acquisitions (1)
- Pragmatism (1)
- Protection of investor rights (1)
- Public law regulatory activities of states (1)
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1)
- Specific intent (1)
- Standards of review (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Private Litigation In A Public Law Sphere:The Standard Of Review In Investor-State Arbitrations, William W. Burke-White, Andreas Von Staden
Private Litigation In A Public Law Sphere:The Standard Of Review In Investor-State Arbitrations, William W. Burke-White, Andreas Von Staden
All Faculty Scholarship
International arbitration and, particularly, investor-state arbitration is rapidly shifting to include disputes of a public law nature. Yet, arbitral tribunals continue to apply standards of review derived from the private law origins of international arbitration, have not recognized the new public law context of these disputes, and have failed to develop a coherent jurisprudence with regard to the applicable standard for reviewing a state's public regulatory activities. This problematic approach is evidenced by a recent series of cases brought by foreign investors against Argentina challenging the economic recovery program launched after a massive financial collapse and has called into question …
Intention, Torture, And The Concept Of State Crime, Aditi Bagchi
Intention, Torture, And The Concept Of State Crime, Aditi Bagchi
All Faculty Scholarship
Notwithstanding the universal prohibition against torture, and almost universal agreement that in order to qualify as torture, the act in question must be committed intentionally with an illicit purpose, the intentional element of torture remains ambiguous. I make the following claims about how we should interpret the intent requirement as applied to states. First, state intent should be understood objectively with reference to the apparent reasons for state action. The subjective motivation of particular state actors is not directly relevant. While we focus on subjective intent in the context of individual crime because of its relation to culpability and blameworthiness, …
Power, Protocol And Practicality: Communications From The District Court During An Appeal, Catherine T. Struve
Power, Protocol And Practicality: Communications From The District Court During An Appeal, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Time Out, Stephen B. Burbank
Norm Change Or Judicial Decree? The Courts, The Public, And Welfare Reform, Amy L. Wax
Norm Change Or Judicial Decree? The Courts, The Public, And Welfare Reform, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Supreme Court Review, Symposium Foreword, Mitchell N. Berman
Symposium: Supreme Court Review, Symposium Foreword, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Originalism Is Bunk, Mitchell N. Berman
How To Prevent Hard Cases From Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware And The Strategic Use Of Comity, Marcel Kahan, Edward B. Rock
How To Prevent Hard Cases From Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware And The Strategic Use Of Comity, Marcel Kahan, Edward B. Rock
All Faculty Scholarship
The Bear Stearns/JP Morgan Chase merger placed Delaware between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, the deal’s unprecedented deal protection measures – especially the 39.5% share exchange agreement – were probably invalid under current Delaware doctrine because they rendered the Bear Stearns shareholders’ approval rights entirely illusory. On the other hand, if a Delaware court were to enjoin a deal pushed by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury and arguably necessary to prevent a collapse of the international financial system, it would invite just the sort of federal intervention that would undermine Delaware’s role as the …
Ruth Bader Ginsburg And Sensible Pragmatism In Federal Jurisdictional Policy, Tobias Barrington Wolff
Ruth Bader Ginsburg And Sensible Pragmatism In Federal Jurisdictional Policy, Tobias Barrington Wolff
All Faculty Scholarship
This article, written as part of a symposium celebrating the work of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the occasion of her fifteenth year on the Supreme Court, examines the strain of sensible legal pragmatism that informs Justice Ginsburg's writing in the fields of Civil Procedure and Federal Jurisdiction. Taking as its point of departure the Supreme Court's decision in City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons, in which Ginsburg dissented, the article develops an argument against strict textualism in federal jurisdictional analysis. In its place, the article urges a purposive mode of interpretation that approaches jurisdictional text with a …
Straw, Sand, And Sophistry, Stephen B. Burbank
Straw, Sand, And Sophistry, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.