Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legal Education (30)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
- Labor and Employment Law (5)
- Legal Profession (5)
- Legislation (5)
-
- Courts (4)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Judges (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Keyword
-
- Curriculum (28)
- Law professors (28)
- Law students (28)
- University of Michigan Law School (27)
- Law schools (24)
-
- Events (22)
- Newspapers (22)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Careers (4)
- Empirical studies (4)
- Legal practice (4)
- Salaries (4)
- Congress (3)
- Negotiation (3)
- Admissibility (2)
- Affirmative action (2)
- Bankruptcy (2)
- Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (2)
- Creditors (2)
- Debtors (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Labor unions (2)
- Law reform (2)
- Lawyering skills (2)
- National Labor Relations Act (2)
- Police (2)
- Searches (2)
- Seizures (2)
- Truth (2)
- AAA Arbitration (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 53
Full-Text Articles in Law
Vol. 33, No. 10, November 28, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 10, November 28, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Profs: Ax Summer Term •Sandalow Pulls Down Six Figures Annually •Polarization Politics: Whose Side are You On? •Lodahl Just Disgruntled Over Democratic Outcome •2, 4, 6, 8, Come on, Let's Evaluate •The Comparable Worth Debate: A Recipe for Economic Disaster •Peer Schools Aid Repayment •'Alternative' Careers Explored •HLSA Proposes Office Plan •Law Students to Stage Play •Crossword •'Choose Me' Short on Quality Options •Save a Suit, Draft a Lawyer •Notices •The UPI's Bottom Five List •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 9, November 14, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 9, November 14, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Debts Hurting Public Interest? •Oil Sheik to Author Yearbook Article •Shapiro Discusses Oral Argument •Reflection on the Election: Is the Great Society Dead? •Get Committed •Eklund: Share Office Space, or Lose It •New Limo Service Begins Airport Price War •Dry Up, Aristocrats •Playoff-Bound Law Gold Stomps Shoes •Group to Discuss Loan Plan •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 8, November 7, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 8, November 7, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Eklund: RG, LSSS Will Keep Offices •Report Tried 11th Hour Reagan Busting •Kopel Doesn't Equate Democracy and Capitalism •Move Over •Kamisar Willing to Teach First Years to Shepardize •Pub Naming Contest Attracts Bad Puns •Students Start New Review •Notices •Kroger Workers Gave a Union Lesson •No Date Yet for Picozzi Hearing •Law Club Mealtimes Become Bridgetime •Trial Practice Set for Vacation •22 File Moot Court Briefs •Crossword •Surrealism Comes to Ann Arbor •My Kingdom for a Magazine •Law in the Raw
Law & Society: Its Research, Richard O. Lempert
Law & Society: Its Research, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
Writing in 1968 on research in the then infant discipline of law and social science, Harry Kalven noted with some pride the growing body of book-length work in the area. While the "relevant" bookshelf in Kalven's office was "still well under five feet," there had for Kalven "been nothing like [these books] previously, and their existence mark[ed] a major change in the relationship of law and science." Today, when I look around my office, I see 11 relevant bookshelves, which is only a small fraction of what has been produced.
Vol. 33, No. 7, October 31, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 7, October 31, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Davis on Everything but Picozzi •Hutchins Bucks Trend •Author Arca Edits Great Communicator •Reagan No Great Leader •Get it Straight •No Grounds to Presume that Democracy and Capitalism are Inevitable Linked •Reception Story Disappointing •Reception was Significant, Coverage was Inadequate •Barnes Piece Dismays Reader •Litman: Director turns Academic •Magazine Survey Sparks Firm Response •Experimental Clubs Combine Torts, Memo •Tutoring Program Offers Guidance •Senate Focuses on New Office Space •'Teachers' Flunks the Course •Unilateral Contact Drills Molars •Crossword •Notices •Dean Discusses Public Interest Law School •Amadeus Makes Sweet Music •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 6, October 17, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 6, October 17, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Senate Changes Budget Timing •Reception Honors Women Profs •Hutchins Temps May Even Out •"Busters" Assault Senses •Holcombe Misconstrued Point of Sign Removal Complaint •Peevishness •Some Law Firms Interviewing This Fall are Heavily Involved in Union-Busting •Moody Complains of Complaining Mood •Reagan's Anticommunist Policy Fails for Want of Human Focus •Experts Debate Immigration Bill •Pub Work Waits for Kitchen Planning •Notices •How to Jazz up Your Law Life •Law Sweep of Softball Series •Crossword •What Color is Your Beanie? •How Many C's are There in Success? •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 5, October 10, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 5, October 10, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Norris Keeps Tabs on Tiger Trials •Office Space Still Empty •No Fee Jump Without Vote •No Haven for Free Speech •Budget Blues •Religious Study in School Okay •LEXIS Changes Location •Beagles' Bite as Big as Bark •Notices •Cubs Rescue Fans' Rights to Cry •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 4, October 3, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 4, October 3, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Senate Pulls $900 Out of its Shirt •Dozens Vie for Clerk Positions •Pluralism Paramount Here •Let's Talk TV •Anti-Speech Act: Signs Torn Down •Cut the Social Committee More •Candidate Racism Censure Not Evenhanded •Simpson-Mazzoli Short on Facts •Critics Polish and Peel New Apple •U-M Students Get Apple Price Break •Notices •Law Students Form Arms Control Group •Dean Allows SFF to Name Firms •Elections •Waves of Guinness Float Ark to New Spot •Jeopardy II: What is 'Imitation'? •Beeristers Slide Past Righteous Ones, 3-0 •Crossword •Stalking the Trivial Pursuit •Law in the Raw
Introduction, Terrance Sandalow
Introduction, Terrance Sandalow
Articles
The articles that follow, initially presented in 1983 as the thirty-second series of Thomas M. Cooley Lectures, address a subject that has deep roots in the United States' history. Assurances that there would be constitutional protection of what are now called human rights-in the United States, they have more frequently been referred to as civil liberties and civil rights or individual rights and liberties-was a practical condition for the adoption of the Constitution. The belief that such guarantees are of vital importance in maintaining a society that is both free and just has over time become even more deeply embedded …
Vol. 33, No. 3, September 26, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 3, September 26, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Faculty Reviews Summer Session •Rabbi Teaches More Than Torah •LSSS: ''Tried MSA?" •Student Dies in Bike Wreck •Schools Establish Secularism •Way to Go •God Belongs in the Schools •Act Against the Reagan Threat •Cut to the Quick •Notices •Twerski: Teacher, Drafter, Commuter •IM Game of the Week: A Fun Contest •Omission is the Better Part of Valor •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 2, September 19, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 2, September 19, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Chatting with Another White •Increase in Grants Tightens Loan Program •Panel, Students Probe Choices •Small is Beautiful •That's Not My God He's Talking About •Firms Give Bucks to SFF •Give Midwest a Break, Okay? •Lie Detectors Don't Equal Due Process •Picozzi Hearing Update •Notices •White on Women, Tax and Student Behavior •Sacks: Thoughts on New Methods •LSSS Readies for Budget •City Dancing: Chance Dies, Fruit Grows •Law in the Raw
Vol. 33, No. 1, September 12, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 33, No. 1, September 12, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Former Student Sues U-M •Five First-Years Fail •Sam the Scholar Speaks •Wanted: Anyone to Help Fill Space •No Snap Judgments •Myths: Close the Gap Now •Letters policy •SFF Thanks •Furniture Displaces Recruitees As Placement Loses Perspective •Prof. Marcus Plant Dies •Regents Appoint Three New Deans •First-years: Much Like Forerunners •Placement Office Changes Policies •Students Log On With Prof. Park •Dean Weighs 14th Amendment Claim •Notices •How I Spent My Summer Vacation •A One Way Ticket to Palookaville •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 22, April 11, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 22, April 11, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Hoopster Ready to Handle Hutchins •Participants Call C.L.S. Seminar A Success •Smith Responds to Racist •Piling On •Poster Apology •Moot Court •Christianity Deserves a Second Look •SFF Thanks •Harvard Initiates New Loan Program •Notices •Senate Okays Public Interest Loan Letter •Conference to Examine First Amendment in Reagan Era •Fiction- Episode IV: Divide and Conquer •Marvin Gaye Leaves Complex Legacy •Mombo Continues •WLSA Gets No Action on Women 's Course •Nightmares for McStudent in Wonderland •Mombo the Mongoose and Assorted Tales •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 21, April 4, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 21, April 4, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Case Club to Start Reform •Students to Get New Lounge; Pub Dries Up •Lancaster Wins Seat •Prez Gets Equal Time •Lest We Forget •Campaign Posters Offend •NCAA Poll •Lawyers Debate Human Rights Role •Silkwood Lawyer to Speak •Notices •Law in the Raw
Introduction: Trends And Developments With Respect To That Amendment 'Central To Enjoyment Of Other Guarantees Of The Bill Of Rights', Yale Kamisar
Articles
Seventy years ago, in the famous Weeks case,' the Supreme Court evoked a storm of controversy by promulgating the federal exclusionary rule. When, a half-century later, in the landmark Mapp case,2 the Court extended the Weeks rule to state criminal proceedings, at least one experienced observer assumed that the controversy "today finds its end." 3 But as we all know now, Mapp only intensified the controversy. Indeed, in recent years spirited debates over proposals to modify the exclusionary rule or to scrap it entirely have filled the air - and the law reviews.'
The Evolution Of Refugee Status In International Law: 1920-1950, James C. Hathaway
The Evolution Of Refugee Status In International Law: 1920-1950, James C. Hathaway
Articles
A refugee is usually thought of as a person compelled to flee his State of origin or residence due to political troubles, persecution, famine or natural disaster. The refugee is perceived as an involuntary migrant, a victim of circumstances which force him to seek sanctuary in a foreign country. Since Rome's reception of the fleeing Barbarians, States have opened their doors to many divergent groups corresponding in a general way to this description of what it means to be a refugee. During a period of more than four centuries prior to 1920, there was little concern to delimit the scope …
Vol. 32, No. 21, April 1, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 21, April 1, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•The Indi Gestae •Hacker Deletes Grades •Prodigy Accepted •Bat Attacks Pooley on Sub-1 •Senators Brawl over Joy Sticks •Where's The Whip? •Listen Up! •Guards a Pain •SFF Buys Mink Farm •Law Review Starts Bathing Suit Contest •Westen Finds Tests In Legal Research •Gunning Makes You Go Bald •Sandalow Dries Out •Notices •Crossword •Cops Raid Peoria
Vol. 32, No. 20, March 28, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 20, March 28, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Three Hopefuls Try For L.S.S.S. Top Spot •Law Making and Law Schooling •Abrams: Media a Special Group •Code Would Violate Rights •We Have Met the Enemy... •Setting the Story Straight: Mondale Had Advantage •Senate •Senate OKs New Policies; Drafts Letter •NCAA Poll Results •Notices •Crossword •Remember, Every Little Bat Helps •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 19, March 21, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 19, March 21, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•SFF Pledges Soar Beyond Expected Goal •Another Woman To Join Faculty •Handicapped Students Protest at Union •Gay Policy Only Goes Halfway •Put up or shut up •Good Work •Fear and Loathing at the Caucus •NCAA Poll Results •Fiction: A Rebel Challenge- The Saga Still Continues •White Looks At Advocate's 'Moral Conflict' •Publications Choose Next Year's Staffs •Senate to Revise Budget Procedure •Kremlinologist Dispels U.S. Misperceptions •Anti-Nuclear Group Seeks Aid •Law Revue Plans Begin •Notices •The Story of the Easy Writer •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 18, March 14, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 18, March 14, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•The RG's Q & A with the NLG •Firms Will Pay to Interview •Former Law Student Commits Suicide •Law Student Problems Unique •Jobs Aren't Everything •Give SFF a Chance •Board Defaced •We've Gotta Have Hart •Road to Seattle Goes Through Manhattan •Second Annual NCAA Contest •Jacob 's Drinking Buddy Tells Real Story •Notices •Firms to Pay Fee •Senate Begins Budgeting •ILS Sponsors Rights Conference •No Fast Breaks- And You Deserve One •Say Goodnight, Dixie •I'll Worry About That Tomorrow •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 17, March 7, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 17, March 7, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Despite Low Turnout Moot Court Continues •Panelists MADly Debate Arms Race •Follow the Leader •Curriculum Needs Career Focus •Fellowships Make Public Interest Jobs Feasible •Senate Subscribes to Alternatives •Clark Article Misled Readers •Law Student Role in Hiring •Growing Up, Law School Style •Notices •Law in the Raw
The Mythical Meritocracy Of Law School Admissions, James C. Hathaway
The Mythical Meritocracy Of Law School Admissions, James C. Hathaway
Articles
Because more people apply to law schools than can be accepted, the admissions procedure at most faculties has been designed to select the best qualified persons from the applicant pool. Selection criteria are adopted to enable law school administrators to determine fairly and objectively which applicants are most likely to succeed in legal studies. Even with the advent of admissions policies designed to increase opportunities for members of various minority groups to study law, specific admissions decisions within each preferred category are generally made with a view to choosing the candidates judged most able to do well at law school. …
Review Of Social Science In The Courtroom: Statistical Techniques And Research Methods For Winning Class-Action Suits, Richard O. Lempert
Review Of Social Science In The Courtroom: Statistical Techniques And Research Methods For Winning Class-Action Suits, Richard O. Lempert
Reviews
If publishers had to conform to anything like truth-in-packaging laws, the title of James Loewen' s book would be something like A Simple Introduction to Elementary Statistical Methods That Might Be of Use in ClassAction Suits for Discrimination, Homilies on the Legal System for Social Scientists, Homilies on Social Science for Lawyers, and Examples from My Own Experience. No one who is interested in the deeper intellectual issues that surround the use of social science in the courtroom, such as the debate over when courts may appropriately tum to social science for aid in resolving fundamental value questions, has reason …
Vol. 32, No. 16, February 15, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 16, February 15, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Crazed Rodents Storm Library •SFF Goes Alaskan •Schauer: We think We'll Keep Him •Jessica Litman to Join Faculty •BLSA Reflects on the State of Black America •It's Only Money •WLSA Survey •Clarify Basis For Grading •Boy Next Door as Antihero •Presidents, Heroes and Myths •Fiction: The Saga Continues- The Wrath of Czar •Notices •Clark Urges Lawyers To Give It Away •Conference Addresses Jewish Legal Role •Public Law Studied •The Not-Ready-For- PRIME-Time Sports •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 15, February 8, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 15, February 8, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•No Feedback, Just Grades •Senate Declines to Up Speakers Budget •Bond: Reagan Destroys Civil Rights •1984 Brings Prospect of New Justices, Same Old Injustices •Sooner or later •Maybe Giants Live Longer •Conference, Externships Provide Public Interest Alternatives •Jewish Commitment in the Legal Profession •Notices •May The Lex Be With You... •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 14, February 1, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 14, February 1, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•SLS Flooded With Requests •Judges Ignore Deadlines, Shaft Clerkship Applicants •Reingold Captains Clinic •Faculty Bytes; Buys Computers •Meese as Attorney General: Law and Order at Any Price? •Dear Professor •More Than Pocket Lining •Never Mind •Senate Wants Comments •Notices •When the Adrenalin's Gone, Things Can Get a Little Bit Dull •Yukon Jack Cries Wimp •The Peorian Experience •Another One(L) Bites The Dust •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 13, January 25, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 13, January 25, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Sexual Orientation Policy Preempted •Dean Departs •Child Advocacy Clinic Back in Courtroom •Senate Supports Case Club Petition •Student Questions Case Club Work Disparities •Sign that petition •Senior Judge Requests Review •Senate Wants Comments •M .A.A.P.: Orientation and Assimilation or a Pacifier that Stigmatizes? •No Lawyer Glut Says ABA Head •Cottage Inn 38, Superbowl 9 •But Will It Play In Peoria? •Godzilla Meets the French Chef •Law in the Raw
Vol. 32, No. 12, January 18, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Vol. 32, No. 12, January 18, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School
Res Gestae
•Ousted Third Years Get Section •Martin Gives Recycled Exam Question •Senate Addresses Red-lining, Exams •Playing the Odds on Finals •Old Exams Never Die •Sexist Speech Annoys Student •Congrats, Knute •Notices •Say Yes to Ann Arbor •Law in the Raw
Efficiency Justifications For Personal Property Security, James J. White
Efficiency Justifications For Personal Property Security, James J. White
Articles
In February of 1983 Pan American World Airways issued 100 million dollars of convertible secured notes. As security for these notes it put up three Boeing 747 SP aircraft, two 747-100 aircraft, and one McDonnell Douglas DC10-30. The appraised value of these aircraft was 157 million dollars. To the extent possible under the law, Pan American made these aircraft subject to the claims of the owners of the new notes. On default, the note holders would have the first claim on these aircraft, would have the right to repossess them outside of bankruptcy, and would have the right to the …
Legal Barriers To Worker Participation In Management Decision Making, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Legal Barriers To Worker Participation In Management Decision Making, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
Collective bargaining lies at the heart of the union-management relationship. It is the end and purpose of the whole effort to protect employees against reprisals when they form an organization to represent them in dealing with their employers. Collective bargaining is grounded in the belief that industrial strife will be checked, and the workers' lot bettered, if workers are given an effective voice in determining the conditions of their employment. My thesis is that federal law, even while placing the force of government behind collective bargaining, has so artificially confined its scope that the process has been seriously impeded from …