Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Series

University of Michigan Law School

Book Chapters

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Reacting Against Treaty Breaches, Bruno Simma, Christian J. Tams Jan 2020

Reacting Against Treaty Breaches, Bruno Simma, Christian J. Tams

Book Chapters

States regularly proclaim the sanctity of treaty obligations and few principles are as firmly established as pacta sunt servanda. Yet, treaty breaches are by no means exceptional: adapting one of international law's most celebrated statements, one might even say that 'almost all nations, almost all the time, consider their rights under a given treaty to be violated: By way of a snapshot, at the time of writing, eleven of fourteen active contentious cases pending before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) involve claims, by one State, that a certain treaty has been violated. And this ignores the many treaty breaches …


Discontinuance And Withdrawal: Article 62, Christine Chinkin May 2019

Discontinuance And Withdrawal: Article 62, Christine Chinkin

Book Chapters

Article 62 provides the major procedural device by which the interests of States not party to proceedings before the ICJ are protected by the Court. The procedure is termed intervention. Intervention: is based, inter alia, on the need for the avoidance of repetitive litigation as well as the need for harmony of principle, for a multiplicity of cases involving the same subject-matter could result in contradictory determinations which obscure rather than clarify the applicable law.


Human Rights, Christine M. Chinkin Jan 2018

Human Rights, Christine M. Chinkin

Book Chapters

The legalisation and judicialisation of international human rights have founded arguments that human rights constitutes a sub-discipline of international law, a ‘distinct jurisprudential phenomenon’, indeed a ‘special law’, central to the anxieties about the fragmentation of international law. The human rights world is a very different one from that envisaged by the VCLT: the latter is an empty, amoral world where States have reciprocal dealings only with other States, where there are no people hurt by States’ actions and demanding reparations, no international institutions creating special mechanisms peopled by experts for monitoring and reporting and no non-governmental organizations (NGOs) demanding …


War/Crimes And The Limits Of The Doctrine Of Sources, Steven R. Ratner Jan 2017

War/Crimes And The Limits Of The Doctrine Of Sources, Steven R. Ratner

Book Chapters

International humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL) are the product of lawmaking processes that are not captured in the black-letter doctrine of sources under which Article 38 of the ICJ Statute is the rule of recognition for international law. Despite efforts by certain institutional players and scholars to place these two regimes squarely within Article 38, both remain distinct in terms of how actors determine whether a purported rule is a legal rule. These distinctions constitute a challenge to the idea of a unified rule of recognition and argue instead for looking for indicators (not rules) about a …


A Mirage In The Sand? Distinguishing Binding And Non-Binding Relations Between States, Christine M. Chinkin Jan 2004

A Mirage In The Sand? Distinguishing Binding And Non-Binding Relations Between States, Christine M. Chinkin

Book Chapters

The article discusses the two decisions (thus far) of the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, especially its consideration of when an internationally binding agreement has come into existence. The Court's willingness to infer a legally binding agreement, regardless of the intentions of at least one of the parties, appears to displace the primacy of consent it has emphasized in its earlier jurisprudence. The decision seems to hold states bound by informal commitments, an approach that might inhibit open negotiations between states and undermine genuine attempts to pre-empt disputes …