Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legal History (10)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Health Law and Policy (9)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (7)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (7)
-
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (5)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Family Law (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Election Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- International Law (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Litigation (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Abuse of discretion (3)
- Baltimore (3)
- Ethics (3)
- Family law (3)
- Health care (3)
-
- Bioethics (2)
- Dispute resolution (2)
- Due process (2)
- Jury (2)
- Jury instructions (2)
- Law (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Medicine (2)
- Nursing (2)
- Statutory interpretation (2)
- 1820 (1)
- 2016 presidential campaign (1)
- 2016 presidential election (1)
- ADR (1)
- AECD (1)
- Activist investors (1)
- African American (1)
- Alexander Brown & Sons (1)
- Alternative models (1)
- Baltimore & Susquehanna Railroad Company (1)
- Baltimore history (1)
- Bank (1)
- Batson (1)
- Blackbird Creek (1)
- Blackbird Creek Marsh Company (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States V. Klintock: Reconsideration Of United States V. Palmer As To General Piracy As Defined By The Law Of Nations Through The Applicable Standards Of Political Action Of Acknowledgement And Recognition And The Status Of Statelessness, Justin L. Sieffert
Legal History Publications
During the February 1820 Term, the Supreme Court of the United States decided four significant piracy cases, beginning with United States v. Klintock. Political, economic, and social pressures enhanced the problem of piracy affecting the interests of the United States. Responding to the criticism of his decision in United States v. Palmer and the passage of the Act of 1819 state Congressional intent for defining piracy by the “law of nations,” Marshall authored the decision in Klintock distinguishing Palmer and, upon reconsideration, interpreting the Act of 1790 to include general piracy as defined by the “law of nations.” With …
Martin V. Mott And The Establishment Of Executive Emergency Authority, Eli Berns-Zieve
Martin V. Mott And The Establishment Of Executive Emergency Authority, Eli Berns-Zieve
Legal History Publications
In August of 1814, a New York farmer named Jacob E. Mott refused to rendezvous with the militia pursuant to the orders of Governor Daniel D. Tompkins as commanded by President James Madison. In 1818, Mott was court martialed and fined ninety-six dollars. One year later, Mott brought an action in replevin in the New York state courts to recover chattel taken from him by a deputy marshal in lieu of the ninety-six dollars. Both the New York trial and appellate courts sided with Mott. In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Joseph Story, the Supreme Court of the United …
Willson V. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co., 25 U.S. 245 (1829): An Early Test Of The Dormant Commerce Clause, Michael P. Collins Jr.
Willson V. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co., 25 U.S. 245 (1829): An Early Test Of The Dormant Commerce Clause, Michael P. Collins Jr.
Legal History Publications
In 1822, Delaware authorized the Blackbird Creek Marsh Company to bank and drain the Blackbird Creek in New Castle County. Subsequently, Thompson Wilson and others destroyed the structure built by the marsh company. The marsh company subsequently sued Mr. Wilson for the damage to its property. The parties eventually appealed their dispute to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held that Delaware’s authorization to bank and dam the creek did not conflict with the federal government’s exclusive authority to regulate commerce between the several states. Ultimately, the Court decided Willson in a manner inconsistent with its earlier …
Brief Of Appellant, Abdullah Malik Joppy A/K/A Richard Joppy V. State Of Maryland, No. 533, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Peter Honnef
Brief Of Appellant, Abdullah Malik Joppy A/K/A Richard Joppy V. State Of Maryland, No. 533, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Peter Honnef
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Davon Jones V. State Of Maryland, No. 547, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Matthew T. Healy
Brief Of Appellant, Davon Jones V. State Of Maryland, No. 547, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Matthew T. Healy
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Matthew Bredlow V. State Of Maryland, No. 621, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Ardalun Kamali
Brief Of Appellant, Matthew Bredlow V. State Of Maryland, No. 621, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Ardalun Kamali
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Mark Andrew Matthews V. State Of Maryland, No. 327, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Jesse M. Lachman
Brief Of Appellant, Mark Andrew Matthews V. State Of Maryland, No. 327, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Jesse M. Lachman
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Is The Supreme Court Disabling The Enabling Act, Or Is Shady Grove Just Another Bad Opera?, Robert J. Condlin
Is The Supreme Court Disabling The Enabling Act, Or Is Shady Grove Just Another Bad Opera?, Robert J. Condlin
Faculty Scholarship
After seventy years of trying, the Supreme Court has yet to agree on whether the Rules Enabling Act articulates a one or two part standard for determining the validity of a Federal Rule. Is it enough that a Federal Rule regulates “practice and procedure,” or must it also not “abridge substantive rights”? The Enabling Act seems to require both, but the Court is not so sure, and the costs of its uncertainty are real. Among other things, litigants must guess whether the decision to apply a Federal Rule in a given case will depend upon predictable ritual, judicial power grab, …
Eugenics, Jim Crow, And Baltimore's Best, Garrett Power
Eugenics, Jim Crow, And Baltimore's Best, Garrett Power
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, John Hill V. State Of Maryland, No. 2740, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Silva Georgian
Brief Of Appellant, John Hill V. State Of Maryland, No. 2740, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Silva Georgian
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, James Goss V. State Of Maryland, No. 669, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Lisa M. Johnson
Brief Of Appellant, James Goss V. State Of Maryland, No. 669, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Lisa M. Johnson
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Interest And Irritation: Brown V. Maryland And The Making Of A National Economy, Henry P. Callegary
Interest And Irritation: Brown V. Maryland And The Making Of A National Economy, Henry P. Callegary
Legal History Publications
This paper examines the United States Supreme Court case Brown v. Maryland, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 (1827), which struck down Maryland’s licensing fee on wholesalers of imported goods. In doing so, the Court reaffirmed its commitment to a national economic policy, instead of a state-centric system. This paper explores the context of the decision, including profiles of the parties involved, the attorneys for both sides, the lower court decisions, and the majority opinion and dissent from the United States Supreme Court. Additionally, this paper follows the lineage of the case through to the present day, examining its doctrinal impact …
The Armstrong Evolution, Michael Pappas
The Armstrong Evolution, Michael Pappas
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Fall 2016
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Fall 2016
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, David J. Maher
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, David J. Maher
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Law And Health Care Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 1, Fall 2016
Law And Health Care Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 1, Fall 2016
Law & Health Care Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Business Law Bulletin, Fall 2016
2016 State Of The Law School, Donald B. Tobin
Remarks At The University Of Maryland Francis King Carey School Of Law Commencement, Tom Perez
Remarks At The University Of Maryland Francis King Carey School Of Law Commencement, Tom Perez
Commencement Speeches
No abstract provided.
Current Trends In Consumer Junk Debt Buyer Litigation, Peter Holland
Current Trends In Consumer Junk Debt Buyer Litigation, Peter Holland
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ocasio V. United States: Why The Hobbs Act Punishes Co-Conspirator Extortion, Joshua T. Carback
Ocasio V. United States: Why The Hobbs Act Punishes Co-Conspirator Extortion, Joshua T. Carback
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Commil Usa, Llc V. Cisco Systems: Joining Policy And Prose To Foster A Good Faith Analysis, Theresa E. Durante
Commil Usa, Llc V. Cisco Systems: Joining Policy And Prose To Foster A Good Faith Analysis, Theresa E. Durante
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
North Carolina State Board Of Dental Examiners V. Ftc: When Will Enough Active State Supervision Be Enough?, Alexandra W. Jabs
North Carolina State Board Of Dental Examiners V. Ftc: When Will Enough Active State Supervision Be Enough?, Alexandra W. Jabs
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Spring 2016
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Spring 2016
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Law & Healthcare Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, Spring 2016
Law & Healthcare Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, Spring 2016
Law & Health Care Newsletter
No abstract provided.
An Uberdilemma: Employees And Independent Contractors In The Sharing Economy, Grant E. Brown
An Uberdilemma: Employees And Independent Contractors In The Sharing Economy, Grant E. Brown
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Reflections On “Innovations In Family Dispute Resolution”, Deborah Thompson Eisenberg
Reflections On “Innovations In Family Dispute Resolution”, Deborah Thompson Eisenberg
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Moving Family Dispute Resolution From The Court System To The Community, Jane C. Murphy, Jana B. Singer
Moving Family Dispute Resolution From The Court System To The Community, Jane C. Murphy, Jana B. Singer
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.