Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

National Order Of Barristers 2007, Kellie Casey Monk Jan 2007

National Order Of Barristers 2007, Kellie Casey Monk

Materials from All Student Organizations

No abstract provided.


Joseph Henry Lumpkin Inn Of Court Team Members 2007-2008, Kellie Casey Monk Jan 2007

Joseph Henry Lumpkin Inn Of Court Team Members 2007-2008, Kellie Casey Monk

Materials from All Student Organizations

No abstract provided.


Moot Court Executive Board, Teams And Coaches, 2007-08, Kellie Casey Monk Jan 2007

Moot Court Executive Board, Teams And Coaches, 2007-08, Kellie Casey Monk

Materials from All Student Organizations

No abstract provided.


Reassessing Damages In Securities Fraud Class Actions, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch Jan 2007

Reassessing Damages In Securities Fraud Class Actions, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Scholarly Works

No coherent doctrinal statement exists for calculating open-market damages for securities fraud class actions. Instead, courts have tried in vain to fashion common-law deceit and misrepresentation remedies to fit open-market fraud. The result is a relatively ineffective system with a hallmark feature: unpredictable damage awards. This poses a significant fraud deterrence problem from both a practical and a theoretical standpoint.

In 2005, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to clarify open-market damage principles and to facilitate earlier dismissal of cases without compensable economic losses. Instead, in Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo, it further confused the damage issue by (1) perpetuating the …


Of Frivolous Litigation And Runaway Juries: A View From The Bench, Thomas A. Eaton Jan 2007

Of Frivolous Litigation And Runaway Juries: A View From The Bench, Thomas A. Eaton

Scholarly Works

The political case for tort reform is based in large measure on the perception that there are too many frivolous law suits and too many excessive jury awards. Where there is considerable empirical evidence casting doubt on both these propositions, they remain the linchpins of the tort reform movement. Scholars, lobbyists, and legislators all have had a voice in the tort reform debates. The viewpoints of trial judges, however, have been largely absent. This is unfortunate because trial judges are the government officials with the closest view of the tort litigation system. They are the ones who see tort litigation …