Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Courts (3)
- Tax Law (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
-
- Taxation-State and Local (2)
- Torts (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Retirement Security Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- 14th Amendment (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Circuit Courts (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
-
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Copyright (1)
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1)
- Dowry (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Intracircuit Nonacquiescence (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Marriage (1)
- NLRB (1)
- Nonacquiescence (1)
- Roman Law (1)
- Scalia (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
- Slaves (1)
- Split Circuits (1)
- Statutory construction (1)
- Torts (1)
- Torts/Personal Injury (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Can International Law Provide Extra-Constitutional Protection For Excludable Aliens?, Louis B. Sohn
Can International Law Provide Extra-Constitutional Protection For Excludable Aliens?, Louis B. Sohn
Scholarly Works
This paper focuses on the problems of those who do not qualify for a regular admission as refugees, but are detained at the entrance point, or are detained in the United States after being released on temporary parole or pending repatriation. The thesis I shall try to defend is that these persons must be treated according to basic rules of humanitarian law; that they are entitled to be treated as human beings, regardless of any particular legislation or administrative regulations depriving them of basic legal protection granted to citizens and regular residents of the country.
The Georgia Jury And Negligence: The View From The Bench, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
The Georgia Jury And Negligence: The View From The Bench, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
Scholarly Works
It is virtually impossible to think seriously about torts and not think of negligence; it is virtually impossible to think seriously about negligence and not think of the jury. The staples of the common-law negligence system--striking a liability profile, and assessing a causal loss--are the staples of the civil jury province. The historic inevitableness of the fact, however, has never put the matter beyond reflection, scrutiny, reconsideration, challenge, nor controversy. Assuredly, controversy.
A Slave's Marriage: Dowry Or Deposit, Alan Watson
A Slave's Marriage: Dowry Or Deposit, Alan Watson
Scholarly Works
This articles examines the concept of dowry among marriage of slaves in ancient Rome.
Mindlessness And The Law, Paul J. Heald, James E. Heald
Mindlessness And The Law, Paul J. Heald, James E. Heald
Scholarly Works
No less an authority than Milton Friedman has argued that improving the realism of assumptions in economic theory, although hardly essential to establishing the absolute validity of the theory (purely an empirical question), may offer several benefits. First, a “restructuring” (to use Posner's term) of an assumption may help explain divergences between predicted and observed results. Second, an explanation of why a seemingly unrealistic assumption does not destroy the predictive value of a theory may strengthen the theory by connecting it to “a more general theory that applies to a wider variety of phenomena . . . and has failed …
Experimenting With The "Right To Die" In The Laboratory Of The States, Thomas A. Eaton, Edward J. Larson
Experimenting With The "Right To Die" In The Laboratory Of The States, Thomas A. Eaton, Edward J. Larson
Scholarly Works
The purposes of this Article are twofold. Our first purpose is to reexamine the legal foundations of a patient's right to refuse treatment. The Court's equivocal handling of the federal constitutional issues in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health invites a closer look at state constitutional, statutory and common law. The source of the underlying right will affect state experimentation with substantive and procedural rules in this area. Our second purpose is to describe the current status of the states' experiments with the right to die. That is, we elaborate in more detail on the state constitutional, statutory and …
Federal Intellectual Property Law And The Economics Of Preemption, Paul J. Heald
Federal Intellectual Property Law And The Economics Of Preemption, Paul J. Heald
Scholarly Works
In the Sears/Compco decisions, the United States Supreme Court established that federal patent law preempts state prohibitions on the mere copying of unpatented product configurations. After years of harsh criticism by commentators, apparent rejection by the lower courts, and allegedly inconsistent treatment by the Court itself, most had proclaimed this principle far beyond resuscitation. The Court, however, miraculously resurrected the principle in Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., which unanimously reaffirmed that intentional copying often should be privileged under federal law. In so doing, the Court provided an expressly economic rationale to be used in future determinations …
Behind The Parity Debate: The Decline Of The Legal Process Tradition In The Law Of Federal Courts, Michael L. Wells
Behind The Parity Debate: The Decline Of The Legal Process Tradition In The Law Of Federal Courts, Michael L. Wells
Scholarly Works
Whether there is parity between federal and state courts has become a central question in the law of federal courts, dividing judges and commentators into two well-defined camps. Although the issue rarely arose thirty years ago, it now enters into virtually every discussion of the rules concerning access to federal court for constitutional claims. On one side of the debate, advocates of broad federal jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to state action claim that federal courts are better than state courts at adjudicating these controversies. On the other side, advocates of state court jurisdiction insist that state courts are fully adequate …
Justice Scalia And The Commerce Clause: Reflections Of A State Tax Lawyer, Walter Hellerstein
Justice Scalia And The Commerce Clause: Reflections Of A State Tax Lawyer, Walter Hellerstein
Scholarly Works
This paper considers Justice Scalia's substantive views of the restraints that the commerce clause imposes on state taxation. My purpose is to examine critically Justice Scalia's dormant or "negative" commerce clause analysis of the state tax issues on which he has opined and to draw from that examination some general conclusions about Justice Scalia's commerce clause jurisprudence.
The Constitutional Case Against Intracircuit Nonacquiescence, Dan T. Coenen
The Constitutional Case Against Intracircuit Nonacquiescence, Dan T. Coenen
Scholarly Works
A cornerstone of the United States Constitution is its separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the national government. The Framers of the Constitution reasoned that separated powers would guard against tyranny by blocking the undue concentration of authority in any single governmental department. In crafting the Constitution, however, the Framers could not anticipate every dispute their scheme of separated powers might engender. One modern separation-of-powers conflict not specifically anticipated by the constitutional text involves so-called "intracircuit nonacquiescence.”
Intracircuit nonacquiescence occurs when executive-branch decision makers refuse to follow a circuit court's precedents even when acting subject …
The Finnigan Case: A Reply To Vogelenzang's Second Stage Apportionment Of Unitary Income, Walter Hellerstein, Jerome R. Hellerstein
The Finnigan Case: A Reply To Vogelenzang's Second Stage Apportionment Of Unitary Income, Walter Hellerstein, Jerome R. Hellerstein
Scholarly Works
In this article J. Hellerstein and W. Hellerstein take issue with arguments made by Pierre Vogelenzang in a special report in Tax Notes that California’s second-stage apportionment of the income of a unitary business amounts to unconstitutional extraterritorial taxation. In the Finnigan case, the California State Board of Equalization held that sales made into California by a corporation that is not itself taxable in California, but is a member of a unitary group that is taxable there, are includable in the numerator of the state’s sales factor in apportioning income. The authors defend this result, arguing that the separate identity …
Broken Promises Revisited: The Window Of Vulnerability For Surviving Spouses Under Erisa, Camilla E. Watson
Broken Promises Revisited: The Window Of Vulnerability For Surviving Spouses Under Erisa, Camilla E. Watson
Scholarly Works
While there are pervasive problems with the current ERISA legislation, this Article will focus only on survivor benefits and will concentrate in particular on the short-term marriage provision. This Article will maintain that facial neutrality notwithstanding, the short-term marriage provision is discriminatory in effect, grounded in dubious logic, and unsupportable from a historical perspective. In order to demonstrate this, this Article will delve thoroughly into the historical development of ERISA, with particular emphasis on the survivor benefit provisions. The depth to which this Article plumbs the general development of ERISA is intended to demonstrate the weak historical foundation on which …
Time For A New Approach: Why The Judiciary Should Disregard The "Law Of The Circuit" When Confronting Nonacquiescence By The National Labor Relations Board, Rebecca H. White
Time For A New Approach: Why The Judiciary Should Disregard The "Law Of The Circuit" When Confronting Nonacquiescence By The National Labor Relations Board, Rebecca H. White
Scholarly Works
The National Labor Relations Board has been criticized for its nonacquiescence policy, under which the Board interprets the national Labor Relations Act, issues an order, and then defends this order before a circuit court that previously had rejected the Board's interpretation of the Act. In this Article, Professor Rebecca White begins by stating that the NLRB's nonacquiescence policy is both lawful and proper. From this basic premise, White then argues that courts of appeals should abandon the "law of the circuit" doctrine when confronting Board nonacquiescence. She contends the policy concerns that justify application of the "law of the circuit"-- …
Protecting The Marine Environment From Vessel Source Pollution: Unclos Iii And Beyond, Daniel M. Bodansky
Protecting The Marine Environment From Vessel Source Pollution: Unclos Iii And Beyond, Daniel M. Bodansky
Scholarly Works
The vessel-source pollution provisions of UNCLOS III have become the reference point for virtually all discussions of marine environmental jurisdiction and, although the Convention is not yet in force, have arguably become norms of customary international law. Moreover, these environmental provisions are likely to come under increased scrutiny and assume even greater importance should the disputes over the seabed mining provisions of the Convention be resolved. Thus far, these disputes have stood in the way of ratification by many advanced industrialized countries, including the United States. The U.S. Congress recently rejected several international conventions dealing with oil spills on the …
The Canons Of Construction In Georgia: "Anachronisms" In Action, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
The Canons Of Construction In Georgia: "Anachronisms" In Action, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
Scholarly Works
Two initial observations may be tendered concerning the canons of interpretations: The literature, almost uniformly, discredits them; the courts, almost uniformly, employ them. The purpose of this effort is to reflect some sense of background, and illustratively to marshal the Georgia experiences with what are perhaps the three most famous canons of interpretation.
Congress's Paramount Role In Setting The Scope Of Federal Jurisdiction, Michael L. Wells
Congress's Paramount Role In Setting The Scope Of Federal Jurisdiction, Michael L. Wells
Scholarly Works
Article III presents a conundrum for scholars seeking a coherent explanation of the federal courts' role in our system of government. On the one hand, the framers set up the judiciary as a separate branch with jurisdiction over federal law and other matters of federal interest. They granted federal judges life tenure and undiminishable salary in order to preserve judicial independence from executive and legislative pressure. It is evident from these provisions that the framers saw a need for a strong national judiciary. At the same time, article III explicitly leaves to Congress the decision whether to create any lower …
Governmental Inaction As A Constitutional Tort: Deshaney And Its Aftermath, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Governmental Inaction As A Constitutional Tort: Deshaney And Its Aftermath, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services is the Supreme Court's first major effort to define the scope of state and local governments' affirmative obligations under the fourteenth amendment. The Court rejected liability against a county welfare agency and a caseworker for failing to prevent a father from severely beating his four-year-old son. The Court intimated that constitutional affirmative duties exist only where the plaintiff is in the state's custody. Scholarly commentary reads the case as announcing a sweeping prohibition against the imposition of affirmative duties in other contexts. Professors Eaton and Wells demonstrate that the DeShaney opinion is …
The Vices Of Originality, Paul J. Heald
The Vices Of Originality, Paul J. Heald
Scholarly Works
Lately, the Constitution has become an unwelcome guest at the parties of those claiming rights lying on the periphery of intellectual property. Two terms ago, in Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats Inc., the Court held that federal patent law preempted a Florida statute forbidding the reproduction of boat hulls by use of any direct molding process. The Court's decision effectively provided a limited constitutional right to copy unpatented product shapes and designs. Most recently, in Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service, Inc. the Intellectual Property Clause was held to create positive restraints on Congress's ability to …
Against An Elite Federal Judiciary: Comments On The Report Of The Federal Courts Study Committee, Michael L. Wells
Against An Elite Federal Judiciary: Comments On The Report Of The Federal Courts Study Committee, Michael L. Wells
Scholarly Works
No doubt some reform of the federal courts is essential if they are to cope with the proliferation of litigation over the past thirty years and the resulting "congestion, delay, expense, and expansion" in the federal courts. While the problem may not amount to an "impending crisis", the burgeoning caseload surely poses a threat, at least in the long run, to the ability of the federal courts to function effectively. The hard question is not whether something should be done, but what to do about it. There is no shortage of interesting ideas. Some of the ideas that clamor for …