Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Domestic violence (2)
- Agenda manipulation (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Arrow's impossibility theorem (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
-
- Critical race theory (1)
- Essentialism (1)
- Family law (1)
- Feminism (1)
- Feminist legal theory (1)
- International law (1)
- Intervention (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal ethics and professionalism (1)
- Legal process theory (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Loopholes (1)
- Multi-criteria decision-making (1)
- National security (1)
- Rape (1)
- Sexual assault (1)
- Social choice (1)
- Structuralism (1)
- U.N. Security Council (1)
- Voting cycles (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Book Review, Peter H. Huang
Book Review, Peter H. Huang
Publications
This review of Leo Katz's book, Why the Law is So Perverse, addresses three questions. First, does Katz draw the appropriate normative conclusions about legal perversities based on their connections to social choice theory? In other words, what are the legal ethics and professionalism implications of his book? Second, how does each of the legal perversities in the book follow from a particular social choice theory result? In other words, what is the precise theoretical connection between each of the legal perversities discussed and an impossibility theorem in social choice theory? Third, can we reinterpret our understanding of the …
The U.N. Security Council's Duty To Decide, Anna Spain
The U.N. Security Council's Duty To Decide, Anna Spain
Publications
When faced with a global crisis within the scope of its mandate, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC or Council) has no obligation to decide whether or not to take action. This Article argues that it should. The UNSC is the only governing body with the legal authority to authorize binding measures necessary to restore peace and security, yet neither the United Nations Charter nor the UNSC's own rules clarify the extent of its obligations. Unlike courts, the UNSC lacks a procedural rule establishing that it has a duty to decide. Unlike the United States Congress, which accepts its practical …
A Structuralist Approach To The Two State Action Doctrines, Justin Desautels-Stein
A Structuralist Approach To The Two State Action Doctrines, Justin Desautels-Stein
Publications
By all accounts, the constitutional and antitrust state-action doctrines are strangers. Courts and scholars see the constitutional state-action doctrine as about the applicability of constitutional rights in private disputes, and the antitrust state-action doctrine as a judicial negotiation between the scope of the Sherman Act and the demands of federalism. In this conventional view, the only thing the doctrines share in common is that they are both an awful mess. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom and argues that the two state-action doctrines are fundamentally connected, and when viewed in a certain light, not even that messy. It is not …
Re-Problematizing Anger In Domestic Violence Advocacy, Deborah Cantrell
Re-Problematizing Anger In Domestic Violence Advocacy, Deborah Cantrell
Publications
Feminist advocacy commits wholeheartedly to a woman’s autonomous choices about how to respond to domestic violence, prioritizing a woman’s own lived experiences and her own assessments of her needs and goals over other supposedly “objective” assessments. Feminists robustly privilege individual choices of women in part as a way of revealing anti-woman bias in the dominant, patriarchal legal system as well to reject male constructions of feminine behavior. In feminist domestic violence advocacy, scholars and advocates have argued that a woman’s autonomous choices include capacious choices about the kinds of emotions that a woman might express about being subjected to abuse. …
Neofeminism, Aya Gruber
Neofeminism, Aya Gruber
Publications
Today it is prosaic to say that "feminism is dead." Far from being moribund, feminist legal theory is breaking from its somewhat dogmatic past and forging ahead with new vigor. Many modern feminist legal scholars seek innovative ways to better the legal, social, and economic status of women while simultaneously questioning some of the more troubling moves of second-wave feminism, such as the tendency to essentialize the woman's experience, the turn to authoritarian state policies, and the characterization of women as pure objects or agents. These "neofeminists" prioritize women's issues but maintain a strong commitment to distributive justice and recognize …