Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Good Faith, Bad Faith And The Gulf Between: A Proposal For Consistent Terminology, Steve Coughlan
Good Faith, Bad Faith And The Gulf Between: A Proposal For Consistent Terminology, Steve Coughlan
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Since the earliest days of section 24(2) jurisprudence, the phrase “good faith” has been used. For nearly as long, it has been used inconsistently. The same is true, to a lesser extent, of the phrase “bad faith.” This article traces the confusion which arises in understanding and in reasoning from the failure to restrict these phrases to single meanings. The article then proposes particular meanings for each, which would limit their applicability to extreme situations at either end of the spectrum. It is proposed that the term “good faith” should only be used in circumstances where it settles that the …
Keeping 'Reasonable Grounds' Meaningful, Steve Coughlan
Keeping 'Reasonable Grounds' Meaningful, Steve Coughlan
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Two recent Court of Appeal cases (R. v. Jir and R. v. Bush, both reported ante, pp. 53 and 29) are examples of tendencies in some recent decisions to weaken the "reasonable grounds" standard for arrest. That the reasonable grounds standard for arrest is important is beyond question. As the Supreme Court of Canada has said, Without such an important standard, even the most democratic society could all too easily fall prey to the abuses and excesses of a police state. In subtle and sometimes unintentional ways, however, the reasonable ground standard is being undermined. This short article will examine …
R. V. Ryan - Duress Is Not Necessary Where Necessity Is Sufficient, Steve Coughlan
R. V. Ryan - Duress Is Not Necessary Where Necessity Is Sufficient, Steve Coughlan
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The accused's claim in R. v. Ryan that she committed an offence in response to a history of abuse is, at a factual level, stronger than that in the landmark case of R. v. Lavallee, which first established the relevance of such a claim to criminal defences. In each case there was expert evidence about the accused's psychological condition. In Ryan, however, the accused herself testified at length about events over a period of many years and her evidence was accepted by the trial judge, unlike Lavallee where the accused did not testify at all. Further, the threats of death …