Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Supreme Court of the United States (12)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (10)
- Judges (7)
- Jurisprudence (7)
-
- Legal History (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Courts (6)
- Intellectual Property Law (5)
- International Law (5)
- Second Amendment (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- Business (4)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- International Trade Law (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Law and Philosophy (4)
- Legal Writing and Research (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Tax Law (4)
- Contracts (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal Studies (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (12)
- Civil rights (5)
- Corporate governance (5)
- Empirical (5)
- Judicial process (5)
-
- Law--Interpretation and construction (4)
- Law--Philosophy (4)
- Patent laws and legislation (4)
- Constitutional history (3)
- Firearms--Law and legislation (3)
- Judicial review (3)
- Separation of powers (3)
- Taxation--Law and legislation (3)
- Capital punishment (2)
- Commercial policy (2)
- Compliance (2)
- Conflict of interests (2)
- Corporations--Finance (2)
- Democracy (2)
- Design protection (2)
- Discrimination in employment (2)
- Eighth Amendment (2)
- Emigration and immigration law (2)
- Equality (2)
- Establishment Clause (2)
- Executive power (2)
- Federal government (2)
- Federal-state controversies (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Financial risk management (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 87
Full-Text Articles in Law
Let History Repeat Itself: Solving Originalism's History Problem In Interpreting The Establishment Clause, Neil Joseph
Let History Repeat Itself: Solving Originalism's History Problem In Interpreting The Establishment Clause, Neil Joseph
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
The Supreme Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudence is all over the place. The current justices have widely divergent views on the Establishment Clause's meaning, and the Lemon test has been widely panned by several justices. Originalist judges, however, have had a fairly consistent approach to interpreting the Establishment Clause. This largely stems from their reliance on history. This Note argues that their use of history in analyzing the Establishment Clause is flawed. Originalist Establishment Clause jurisprudence has been and is criticized for being unprincipled. And those criticisms are correct. Originalists encounter such criticism because the justices struggle to reconcile historical practice …
The Trajectory Of Forensics, Peter Neufeld
The Trajectory Of Forensics, Peter Neufeld
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Forensics At The Federal Level, Sue Ballou
Forensics At The Federal Level, Sue Ballou
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
The Public Reception Of The “Path Forward” Report, Steven Kendall
The Public Reception Of The “Path Forward” Report, Steven Kendall
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Statistics And The Impact Of The 2009 Nas Report, Karen Kafadar
Statistics And The Impact Of The 2009 Nas Report, Karen Kafadar
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Gamble V. United States: A Commentary, Kayla Mullen
Gamble V. United States: A Commentary, Kayla Mullen
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and federal governments for the same conduct, due to the fact that the state and federal government constitute two separate sovereignties. The doctrine is grounded in the idea that each sovereign derives its power from independent sources—the federal government from the Constitution and the states from their inherent police power, preserved to them by the Tenth Amendment—and thus, each sovereign may determine what constitutes an offense against its peace and dignity in an exercise of its own sovereignty. Under this exception, defendants, by a single act, may …
Litigating War: The Justiciability Of Executive War Power, Chris Smith
Litigating War: The Justiciability Of Executive War Power, Chris Smith
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Courts frequently dismiss claims against the Executive’s use of the war power as being non-justiciable political questions. This lack of a judicial check has created a situation in which meaningful checks and balances on the war power are found only in the Executive Branch itself. But the Constitution places the bulk of war powers in the hands of Congress. Executive usurpation of Congress’s constitutional prerogative to initiate hostilities has significantly weakened the separation of powers. In the aftermath of the Vietnam War, Congress sought to reassert its constitutional authority over war-making decisions by passing the War Powers Resolution. The Resolution …
The Race Horse That Wouldn't Die: On Herrera V. Wyoming, Benjamin Cantor
The Race Horse That Wouldn't Die: On Herrera V. Wyoming, Benjamin Cantor
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In Herrera v. Wyoming, the Supreme Court is considering how to reconcile the Crow Tribe’s hunting right with Wyoming’s sovereignty. This endeavor requires examining nineteenth-century treaties and precedents to decipher the intents of the Crow Tribe and the United States government. If the Court’s decision includes a clear articulation of whether Native American treaty rights may be truncated by mere implication, tribes nationwide may be at risk of losing treaty rights they have enjoyed for centuries. In making its decision, the Supreme Court will also have to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of overturning precedent and of undermining its …
Apple V. Pepper: Applying The Indirect Purchaser Rule To Online Platforms, Jason Wasserman
Apple V. Pepper: Applying The Indirect Purchaser Rule To Online Platforms, Jason Wasserman
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Long-established antitrust precedent bars customers who buy a firm’s product through intermediaries from suing that firm for antitrust damages. In Apple Inc. v. Pepper, this “indirect purchaser rule” is brought into the smartphone age in a price-fixing dispute between technology giant Apple and iPhone users. This case will determine whether iPhone users buy smartphone applications directly from Apple through the App Store, or if Apple is merely an intermediary seller-agent of app developers. The indirect purchase rule is generally considered settled precedent. How the rule should apply to online platforms, however, differs between circuit courts, which have split on …
A Test Of Sovereignty: Franchise Tax Board Of The State Of California V. Gilbert P. Hyatt, Timothy Dill
A Test Of Sovereignty: Franchise Tax Board Of The State Of California V. Gilbert P. Hyatt, Timothy Dill
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, the Supreme Court considers whether to overrule Nevada v. Hall, a 1979 Supreme Court decision. Hall permitted a State to be haled into the court of another State without its consent. In 2016, an evenly divided Supreme Court affirmed Hall 4-4 when faced with the same question, and following a remand to the Nevada Supreme Court, the Court has granted certiorari on this question once again. This Commentary contends that Hall was wrongly decided and should be overruled. The Constitution’s ratification did not alter the status of common-law State sovereign …
Legislator-Led Legislative Prayer And The Search For Religious Neutrality, Aishwarya Masrani
Legislator-Led Legislative Prayer And The Search For Religious Neutrality, Aishwarya Masrani
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Leading a group in prayer in a public setting blurs the line between public and private. Such blurring implicates a constitutional tension between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. This tension is magnified when the constitutionality of prayer is questioned in the context of democratic participation. Current Supreme Court precedent holds legislative prayer to be constitutional, but the relevant cases, Marsh v. Chambers and Town of Greece, NY v. Galloway, do not address the specific constitutionality of legislator-led prayer. There is currently a circuit split on the subject: in Bormuth v. County of Jackson, the United …
Equal Dignity And Unequal Protection: A Framework For Analyzing Disparate Impact Claims, Kyle P. Nodes
Equal Dignity And Unequal Protection: A Framework For Analyzing Disparate Impact Claims, Kyle P. Nodes
Duke Law Journal Online
The Supreme Court has long endorsed the theory of the “colorblind” Equal Protection Clause, viewing it as a mandate of only facial equality. Due to rigid doctrine that limits true protection to only a short, stagnant list of fundamental rights and suspect classifications and that requires proof of discriminatory intent, only the most blatant, purposeful inequality is within constitutional reach. Festering outside of this doctrinal sphere are powerful examples of state actions that impose disparate impacts on marginalized communities, such as the nationwide system of laws that disqualify individuals—disproportionately black men—with felony convictions from the jury pool.
However, the door …
Collateral Damage: Private Merger Lawsuits In The Wake Of Section 2’S Contraction, Paul F. Brzyski
Collateral Damage: Private Merger Lawsuits In The Wake Of Section 2’S Contraction, Paul F. Brzyski
Duke Law Journal Online
For over 100 years, the Clayton Act has ostensibly prohibited anticompetitive mergers and acquisitions. Yet, as fears of market concentration and market power grow, it seems high time for a boost in enforcement. Armed with statutory causes of action for injunctive relief and treble damages, private plaintiffs could provide that needed boost. However, these plaintiffs face an unexpected hurdle to enforcing the merger laws: section 2 of the Sherman Act.
This Note argues that the narrowing of liability under section 2 over the past three decades has had a collateral impact on private plaintiffs’—especially rival firms’—ability to satisfy the antitrust …
Stepping Into The Breach: State Constitutions As A Vehicle For Advancing Rights-Based Climate Litigation, Benjamin T. Sharp
Stepping Into The Breach: State Constitutions As A Vehicle For Advancing Rights-Based Climate Litigation, Benjamin T. Sharp
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
The perceived failures of the political branches to mitigate climate change have led climate change activists to seek alternative means to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas emissions; many are turning to litigation. The claims in these cases rely on a variety of legal bases, but this Note will focus on those cases claiming that governments’ failures to prevent climate change amount to violations of the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Rights-based climate change litigation is likely to increase in the future. Among the most prominent of the surviving rights-based cases is Juliana v. …
Bucklew V. Precythe: The Power Of Assumptions And Lethal Injection, Renata Gomez
Bucklew V. Precythe: The Power Of Assumptions And Lethal Injection, Renata Gomez
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Once again, the Supreme Court of the United States has an opportunity to determine the extent to which death-row inmates can bring as-applied challenges to the states’ method of execution and prevent possible botched executions. In Bucklew v. Precythe, the Court will confront the assumptions that the execution team is equipped to handle any execution and that the procedure will go as planned. Additionally, the Court will determine whether the standard articulated in Glossip v. Gross, which requires inmates asserting facial challenges to the states’ method of execution to plead a readily available alternative method of execution, further …
Timbs V. Indiana: The Constitutionality Of Civil Forfeiture When Used By States, Kris Fernandez
Timbs V. Indiana: The Constitutionality Of Civil Forfeiture When Used By States, Kris Fernandez
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment against the states, providing extra protection for individuals against fines and forfeiture that are “grossly disproportionate” to the harm caused. The decision to incorporate the Excessive Fines Clause and the guidelines for applying that incorporation would have a substantial effect on governments, which often rely on the revenue gained from forfeiture. This commentary argues that the Supreme Court of the United States should incorporate the Excessive Fines Clause based on historical support of an individual’s right to be …
Swords Into Plowshares: Nuclear Power And The Atomic Energy Act’S Preemptive Scope In Virginia Uranium, Inc. V. Warren, Francis X. Liesman
Swords Into Plowshares: Nuclear Power And The Atomic Energy Act’S Preemptive Scope In Virginia Uranium, Inc. V. Warren, Francis X. Liesman
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
This commentary highlights the considerations the Supreme Court should attend to in its decision in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, both in construing § 2021(k) and in reviewing the Fourth Circuit’s reading of precedent from other circuits and from the Court’s prior opinions. Specifically, the Court must clarify how to interpret § 2021(k)’s activities component in concert with its “for purposes” language and determine the importance of the particular underlying activity the state seeks to regulate in a preemption analysis under the Atomic Energy Act. Clarification is necessary to ensure that courts properly effectuate Congress’s intent in regulating nuclear …
Intelligent Design & Egyptian Goddess: A Response To Professors Buccafusco, Lemley & Masur, Sarah Burstein
Intelligent Design & Egyptian Goddess: A Response To Professors Buccafusco, Lemley & Masur, Sarah Burstein
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Boiling Down Boilerplate In M&A Agreements: A Response To Choi, Gulati, & Scott, Robert Anderson, Jeffrey Manns
Boiling Down Boilerplate In M&A Agreements: A Response To Choi, Gulati, & Scott, Robert Anderson, Jeffrey Manns
Duke Law Journal Online
“Boilerplate” consists of standardized terms whose meaning is intended to be consistent from one transaction to the next, and these provisions are ubiquitous in contracts and related transactional documents. In their recent Duke Law Journal article Stephen Choi, Mitu Gulati, and Robert Scott have highlighted the potentially corrosive effect of the legal drafting process on boilerplate provisions. They show how incremental edits to boilerplate pari passu clauses for sovereign debt agreements have led to textual “black holes,” which potentially undercut the standardization purpose, wording, and substantive meaning of these boilerplate provisions. In this Article we offer preliminary evidence of a …
Does The American Rule Promote Access To Justice? Was That Why It Was Adopted?, John Leubsdorf
Does The American Rule Promote Access To Justice? Was That Why It Was Adopted?, John Leubsdorf
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
The Year In Review 2018: Selected Cases From The Alaska Supreme Court And The Alaska Court Of Appeals
Alaska Law Review Year in Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court As Superweapon: A Response To Epps & Sitaraman, Stephen E. Sachs
Supreme Court As Superweapon: A Response To Epps & Sitaraman, Stephen E. Sachs
Faculty Scholarship
Is the Supreme Court's legitimacy in crisis? Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman argue that it is. In their Feature, How to Save the Supreme Court, they suggest legally radical reforms to restore a politically moderate Court. Unfortunately, their proposals might destroy the Court's legitimacy in order to save it. And their case that there is any crisis may fail to persuade a reader with different legal or political priors. If the Supreme Court needs saving, it will be saving from itself, and from too broad a conception of its own legal omnipotence. A Court that seems unbound by legal principle …
The Outsized Influence Of The Fcpa?, Veronica Root Martinez
The Outsized Influence Of The Fcpa?, Veronica Root Martinez
Faculty Scholarship
The current power and influence of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) is really quite remarkable when one considers the statute was largely ignored for its first twenty-five years of existence. This statute, meant to reign in corruption by United States companies doing business abroad; has generated billions of dollars in revenue for the United States government; prompted the development of law firm practice groups and law school courses; become the subject of numerous scholarly articles; and has, arguably, made anti-bribery efforts the highest of priorities for multinational corporations engaged in robust compliance efforts. Corporations, scholars, and the public would …
Constituencies And Control In Statutory Drafting: Interviews With Government Tax Counsels, Shu-Yi Oei, Leigh Z. Osofsky
Constituencies And Control In Statutory Drafting: Interviews With Government Tax Counsels, Shu-Yi Oei, Leigh Z. Osofsky
Faculty Scholarship
Tax statutes have long been derided as convoluted and unreadable. But there is little existing research about drafting practices that helps us contextualize such critiques. In this Article, we conduct the first in-depth empirical examination of how tax law drafting and formulation decisions are made. We report findings from interviews with government counsels who participated in the tax legislative process over the past four decades. Our interviews revealed that tax legislation drafting decisions are both targeted to and controlled by experts. Most counsels did not consider statutory formulation or readability important, as long as substantive meaning was accurate. Many held …
Central Clearing Of Financial Contracts: Theory And Regulatory Implications, Steven L. Schwarcz
Central Clearing Of Financial Contracts: Theory And Regulatory Implications, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
To protect economic stability, post-crisis regulation requires financial institutions to clear and settle most of their derivatives contracts through central counterparties, such as clearinghouses associated with securities exchanges. This Article asks whether regulators should expand the central clearing requirement to non-derivative financial contracts, such as loan agreements. The Article begins by theorizing how and why central clearing can reduce systemic risk. It then examines the theory’s regulatory and economic efficiency implications, first for current requirements to centrally clear derivatives contracts and thereafter for deciding whether to extend those requirements to non-derivative contracts. The inquiry has real practical importance because the …
Analyzing The Trump Administration's International Trade Strategy, Rachel Brewster
Analyzing The Trump Administration's International Trade Strategy, Rachel Brewster
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Patent Trial And Appeal Board's Consistency-Enhancing Function, Michael D. Frakes, Melissa F. Wasserman
Patent Trial And Appeal Board's Consistency-Enhancing Function, Michael D. Frakes, Melissa F. Wasserman
Faculty Scholarship
Agency heads, who have the primary responsibility for setting an agency's policy preferences, have a variety of tools by which they attempt to minimize the discretion of their staff officials in an effort to ensure agency policy preferences are consistently applied. One such mechanism is subjecting agency official's determinations to higher-level agency review. While scholars have long surmised that judges seek to minimize reversal of their decisions by a higher-level court, how agency officials' decisions are influenced by higher-level agency reconsideration has mostly eluded analysis.
In this Essay, we begin to fill this gap by examining the extent to which …
Combating Silence In The Profession, Veronica Root Martinez
Combating Silence In The Profession, Veronica Root Martinez
Faculty Scholarship
Members of the legal profession have recently taken a public stance against a wave of oppressive policies and practices. From helping immigrants stranded in airports to protesting in the face of white nationalists, lawyers are advocating for equality within and throughout American society each and every day. Yet as these lawyers go out into the world on behalf of others, they do so while their very profession continues to struggle with its own discriminatory past.
For decades, the legal profession purposefully excluded women, religious minorities, and people of color from its ranks, while instilling a select group of individuals with …
The State Of The Death Penalty, Ankur Desai, Brandon L. Garrett
The State Of The Death Penalty, Ankur Desai, Brandon L. Garrett
Faculty Scholarship
The death penalty is in decline in America and most death penalty states do not regularly impose death sentences. In 2016 and 2017, states reached modern lows in imposed death sentences, with just thirty-one defendants sentenced to death in 2016 and thirty-nine in 2017, as compared with over three hundred per year in the 1990s. In 2016, only thirteen states imposed death sentences, and in 2017, fourteen did so, although thirty-one states retain the death penalty. What explains this remarkable and quite unexpected trend? In this Article, we present new analysis of state-level legislative changes that might have been expected …
Unconstitutionally Illegitimate Discrimination, Brandon L. Garrett
Unconstitutionally Illegitimate Discrimination, Brandon L. Garrett
Faculty Scholarship
When government officials express intent to disparage or discriminate against a group, the constitutional consequences can be severe, but they are rarely imposed. In this Article, I argue that discriminatory motive is and should be enough to declare government acts unconstitutional. Second, I argue that the main reason why is the harm to government legitimacy. While some argue that the concern with intentional discrimination is its harm, such as its stigmatizing effect, I argue that the focus should not be on harm, but on how it delegitimizes government. I make the descriptive claim that Constitutional doctrine, in its broad outlines, …