Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (3)
- Intellectual property (3)
- International News Service v. Associated Press (3)
- Patent (3)
- Competition (2)
-
- Harmless use (2)
- Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Author (1)
- Centralization of property (1)
- Commons (1)
- Cooperative sharing (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Costs (1)
- De minimus defense (1)
- Derivative works (1)
- Expression (1)
- Foreseeability (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Gleaning (1)
- Gleaning rule (1)
- Human rights (1)
- IP (1)
- Idea (1)
- Independent inventor defense (1)
- Information technology (1)
- Intangible property (1)
- Intellectual Property and Public Health (1)
- Intentional infringement (1)
- Market power (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Lawful Acquisition And Exercise Of Monopoly Power And Its Implications For The Objectives Of Antitrust, Keith N. Hylton, David S. Evans
The Lawful Acquisition And Exercise Of Monopoly Power And Its Implications For The Objectives Of Antitrust, Keith N. Hylton, David S. Evans
Faculty Scholarship
The antitrust laws of the United States have, from their inception, allowed firms to acquire significant market power, to charge prices that reflect that market power, and to enjoy supra-competitive returns. This article shows that this policy, which was established by the U.S. Congress and affirmed repeatedly by the U.S. courts, reflects a tradeoff between the dynamic benefits that society realizes from allowing firms to secure significant rewards, including monopoly profits, from making risky investments and engaging in innovation; and the static costs that society incurs when firms with significant market power raise price and curtail output. That tradeoff results …
Harmless Boundary Crossings: Their Role In Comparative Institutional Analysis - Lecture Transcript - 10-31-2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Harmless Boundary Crossings: Their Role In Comparative Institutional Analysis - Lecture Transcript - 10-31-2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
I also thank this morning's panelists. What I'm going to do is, first, say a little bit of an overview about what brings us all together and then talk about a particular project that many of you already have heard about, but it is something that has bothered me ever since I entered the field. It is the problem of harmless use, or what you might call a beneficial spillover that causes no loss to the person who is causally responsible for it, either in whole or in part.
Keynote Lecture For Harmless Boundary Crossings: Their Role In Comparative Institutional Analysis - 2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Keynote Lecture For Harmless Boundary Crossings: Their Role In Comparative Institutional Analysis - 2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
One of the things that unifies many of the scholars in IP generally, and in this room in particular, is an interest in what you might call noncommercial models cooperative sharing, peer-to-peer creativity-a yearning for a different kind of life, perhaps, one that's less commercial, more focused on dialogues, both democratic and personal, and a mode of life that emphasizes the process and product of work rather than its monetary payoff. We all know from the work of Teresa Amabile and Alfie Cohen and our own experience that if you are keeping your eye on a monetary goal or getting …
Draft For Harmless Use: Gleaning From Fields Of Copyrighted Works - 2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Draft For Harmless Use: Gleaning From Fields Of Copyrighted Works - 2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
My inquiry is into whether harmless uses of property should give the property owner a right to sue. Under current law, harmless trespasses to land and to copyrights and patents do indeed give rise to liability. Should they? Neither moral philosophy, political science nor economics deals well with the harmless free-rider. The possibility I'm exploring-- just exploring at this stage-- is the following: that where inexhaustible products like information become a primary source of value, our institutions might serve us better if instead of mandating payment for harmless use via legal compulsion, payment for harmless use be left to the …
Current Patent Laws Cannot Claim The Backing Of Human Rights - 2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Current Patent Laws Cannot Claim The Backing Of Human Rights - 2008, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
The majority of the world's countries (one exception being the United States) have undertaken a commitment at the level of human rights to protect the interests of persons who author 'scientific ... production[s]'. This commitment is embodied in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which recognizes in Article 15.1.(c) the rights of everyone 'to benefit from the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.'
Email To Bob Bone Re: Idea Expression Dichotomy, Wendy J. Gordon
Email To Bob Bone Re: Idea Expression Dichotomy, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
This is to recap our discussion, to make sure we're on the same page, and carry this a bit further. I'm very excited.
Inventors, Entrepreneurs, And Intellectual Property Law, Michael J. Meurer
Inventors, Entrepreneurs, And Intellectual Property Law, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
I am not sure why small business concerns have not had more influence on IP law. Perhaps the sentiment prevailing in antitrust law spilled over into IP law. American antitrust law has reached a near consensus that small firms get no special treatment under a law designed to protect competition, not competitors. ° In contrast, European competition law regulators are more likely to protect small business, and European patent policymakers openly fret about how to reform their patent law to promote small business.2
Regardless, my concern in this Article is mostly with the normative question: Should IP law favor …
The Mythical Beginnings Of Intellectual Property, Jessica Silbey
The Mythical Beginnings Of Intellectual Property, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
People commonly justify intellectual property protection with homage to utilitarianism (protecting the incentive to create, invent, or produce quality goods to maximize net social welfare) or natural rights (people should own the product of their creative, inventive, or commercial labor). Despite the ongoing dominance of these theories, a dissatisfying lack of a comprehensive explanation for the value of intellectual property protection remains. One reason for this failure is that economic analysis of intellectual property law tends to undervalue its humanistic element. Whereas utilitarianism and natural rights theories are familiar, at least one other basis for intellectual property protection exists. This …
Moral Philosophy, Information Technology, And Copyright, Wendy J. Gordon
Moral Philosophy, Information Technology, And Copyright, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
A plethora of philosophical issues arise where copyright and patent laws intersect with information technology. Given the necessary brevity of the chapter, my strategy will be to make general observations that can be applied to illuminate one particular issue. I have chosen the issue considered in MGM v. Grokster,2 a recent copyright case from the U.S. Supreme Court Grokster, Ltd., provided a decentralized peer-to-peer technology that many people, typically students, used to copy and distribute music in ways that violated copyright law. The Supreme Court addressed the extent to which Grokster and other technology providers should be held …
Do Patents Perform Like Property?, Michael J. Meurer, James Bessen
Do Patents Perform Like Property?, Michael J. Meurer, James Bessen
Faculty Scholarship
Do patents provide critical incentives to encourage investment in innovation? Or, instead, do patents impose legal risks and burdens on innovators that discourage innovation, as some critics now claim? This paper reviews empirical economic evidence on how well patents perform as a property system.
Should Access To Medicines And Trips Flexibilities Be Limited To Specific Diseases?, Kevin Outterson
Should Access To Medicines And Trips Flexibilities Be Limited To Specific Diseases?, Kevin Outterson
Faculty Scholarship
From the perspective of public health, limiting access programs and TRIPS flexibilities to particular diseases would be quite dangerous and unnecessary. Dangerous because the diseases of the world's rich and poor countries are converging, including non-communicative diseases such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer and depression. Radically cheaper medicines for these conditions could significantly improve health in LMICs. Limitation is also unnecessary because proven tools can be deployed to preserve high-income markets while LMICs pursue equitable flexibilities.
To date, the important global legal texts retain broad application to all relevant diseases, but the some parties continue to propose disease-specific limitations, …