Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Andrea Curcio (1)
- Angelos (1)
- Bar exam (1)
- Berman (1)
- Bilek (1)
-
- Carol Chomsky (1)
- Chomsky (1)
- Claudia Angelos (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Curcio (1)
- Deborah Jones Merritt (1)
- Diploma Privilege and the Constitution (1)
- Diploma privilege (1)
- Dormant commerce clause (1)
- Eileen Kaufman (1)
- Forum defendant rule (1)
- Griggs (1)
- Howarth (1)
- Joan Howarth (1)
- Judith Wegner (1)
- Kaufman (1)
- Legislative history (1)
- Marsha Griggs (1)
- Mary Lu Bilek (1)
- Merritt (1)
- Patricia Salkin (1)
- Purposivism (1)
- Salkin (1)
- Sara Berman (1)
- Snap removal (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Diploma Privilege And The Constitution, Patricia E. Salkin, Claudia Angelos, Sara J. Berman, Mary Lu Bilek, Carol L. Chomsky, Marsha Griggs, Joan W. Howarth, Eileen Kaufman, Deborah Jones Meritt, Judith Wegner, Andrea Curcio
Diploma Privilege And The Constitution, Patricia E. Salkin, Claudia Angelos, Sara J. Berman, Mary Lu Bilek, Carol L. Chomsky, Marsha Griggs, Joan W. Howarth, Eileen Kaufman, Deborah Jones Meritt, Judith Wegner, Andrea Curcio
Scholarly Works
The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting shutdowns are affecting every aspect of society. The legal profession and the justice system have been profoundly disrupted at precisely the time when there is an unprecedented need for legal services to deal with a host of legal issues generated by the pandemic, including disaster relief, health law, insurance, labor law, criminal justice, domestic violence, and civil rights. The need for lawyers to address these issues is great but the prospect of licensing new lawyers is challenging due to the serious health consequences of administering the bar examination during the pandemic.
State Supreme Courts are …
Snap Removal: Concept; Cause; Cacophony; And Cure, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Thomas O. Main, David Mcclure
Snap Removal: Concept; Cause; Cacophony; And Cure, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Thomas O. Main, David Mcclure
Scholarly Works
So-called “snap removal” – removal of a case from state to federal court prior to service on a forum state defendant – has divided federal trial courts for 20 years. Recently, panels of the Second, Third and Fifth Circuits have sided with those supporting the tactic even though it conflicts with the general prohibition on removal when the case includes a forum state defendant, a situation historically viewed as eliminating the need to protect the outsider defendant from possible state court hostility.
Consistent with the public policy underlying diversity jurisdiction – availability of a federal forum to protect against defending …