Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of Pub. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. Of Nev. V. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 88, Ryan Becklean
Summary Of Pub. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. Of Nev. V. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 88, Ryan Becklean
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether the confidentiality set forth in NRS 286.110(3) applies to individual files of retired employees maintained by the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada (“PERS”).
Summary Of Elizondo V. Hood Mach., Inc., 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 84, Jennifer Cutshall
Summary Of Elizondo V. Hood Mach., Inc., 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 84, Jennifer Cutshall
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined two issues: (1) whether an appeals officer’s conclusory order in a workers’ compensation matter failed to meet the statutory requirements of NRS 233B.125; and (2) whether the doctrines of claim and issue preclusion apply to require dismissal of a fourth request to reopen an industrial injury claim under NRS 616C.390.
Summary Of Nevada Public Employees Retirement Board V. Smith, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 65, Jeff Scarborough
Summary Of Nevada Public Employees Retirement Board V. Smith, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 65, Jeff Scarborough
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined two issues: (1) whether an employee under the Public Employees’ Retirement System (“PERS”) could receive retirement benefits before effectively retiring from PERS; and (2) whether an employee under PERS is entitled to equitable relief under NRS 286.190(3)(a) against PERS when PERS did not provide inaccurate information.
Summary Of Majuba Mining V. Pumpkin Copper, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 19, Timothy A. Wiseman
Summary Of Majuba Mining V. Pumpkin Copper, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 19, Timothy A. Wiseman
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The court considered whether a mining company’s failure to pay federal claim maintenance fees, required to avoid forfeiting an unpatented mining claim, rendered a dispute over superior title moot. The court found that since the mining claim was forfeited under federal law, the dispute over superior title was no longer actionable and moot.