Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (2)
- Amateur sports (1)
- Anthony Kennedy (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (1)
-
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Freedom of the press (1)
- Gonzales v. Carhart (1)
- John Roberts (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Media (1)
- Near v. Minnesota (1)
- Newspapers (1)
- Parents Involved (1)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Samuel Alito (1)
- Sandra Day O'Connor (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- State action (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Under-The-Table Overruling, Christopher J. Peters
Under-The-Table Overruling, Christopher J. Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
In this contribution to a Wayne Law Review symposium on the first three years of the Roberts Court, the author normatively assesses the Court's practice of "under-the-table overruling," or "underruling," in high-profile constitutional cases involving abortion, campaign-finance reform, and affirmative action. The Court "underrules" when it renders a decision that undercuts a recent precedent without admitting that it is doing so. The author contends that underruling either is not supported by, or is directly incompatible with, three common rationales for constitutional stare decisis: the noninstrumental rationale, the predictability rationale, and the legitimacy rationale. In particular, while the latter rationale - …
The Colonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. Mccormick And Near V. Minnesota, Eric Easton
The Colonel's Finest Campaign: Robert R. Mccormick And Near V. Minnesota, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
Today, media corporations and their professional and trade associations, along with organizations like Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the American Civil Liberties Union, carefully monitor litigation that implicates First Amendment values and decide whether, when, and how to intervene. It was not always so. Litigation by an institutional press to avoid or create doctrinal precedent under the First Amendment really began with the appointment of Col. Robert R. McCormick to head the ANPA's Committee on Freedom of the Press in the spring of 1928 and his involvement in Near v. Minnesota beginning that fall. Because of McCormick's …
Frozen In Time: The State Action Doctrine's Application To Amateur Sports, Dionne L. Koller
Frozen In Time: The State Action Doctrine's Application To Amateur Sports, Dionne L. Koller
All Faculty Scholarship
The state action doctrine has as its central goal the preservation of liberty by limiting the intrusion of the government into the "private" sphere. It achieves this by applying the Constitution only to government, and not private, action. Traditionally, amateur sports regulators such as the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) have been viewed by courts as private. As a result, this article explains that courts generally give great deference to amateur sports organizations such as the NCAA and USOC to regulate sports with little judicial interference, including in the area of constitutional litigation. …